Formal and Substantial Justification in Legal Decisions: Lasser's Judicial Deliberations - Some Critical Questions from an Argumentative Perspective

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harm Kloosterhuis
Keyword(s):  
Legal Decisions ◽  
Critical Questions

The Many-Colored Cloak

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Malik Mufti
Keyword(s):  
Political Thought ◽  
Arab World ◽  
Political Authority ◽  
Electoral Participation ◽  
Critical Questions ◽  
Ibn Rushd ◽  
The People ◽  
Democratic Principles ◽  
The Many ◽  
Religion And Democracy

This articles argues (a) that democratic discourse has already become hegemonic among mainstream Islamist movements in Turkey and the Arab world; (b) that while this development originated in tactical calculations, it constitutes a consequential transformation in Islamist political thought; and (c) that this transformation, in turn, raises critical questions about the interaction of religion and democracy with which contemporary Islamists have not yet grappled adequately but which were anticipated by medieval philosophers such as al-Farabi and Ibn Rushd. The argument is laid out through an analysis (based on textual sources and interviews) of key decisions on electoral participation made by Turkey’s AK Party and the Muslim Brotherhoods in Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. Particular attention is focused on these movements’ gradual embrace of three key democratic principles: pluralism, the people as the source of political authority, and the legitimacy of such procedural mechanisms as multiple parties and regular elections.

Best to Be Last: Serial Position Effects in Legal Decisions in the Field and in the Lab

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ori Plonsky ◽  
Daniel L. Chen ◽  
Liat Netzer ◽  
Talya Steiner ◽  
Yuval Feldman
Keyword(s):  
Serial Position ◽  
Position Effects ◽  
Serial Position Effects ◽  
Legal Decisions

The Oklahoma State Constitution

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny M. Adkison ◽  
Lisa McNair Palmer
Keyword(s):  
Progressive Era ◽  
Direct Democracy ◽  
The United States ◽  
Constitutional Development ◽  
Legal Decisions ◽  
United States Today ◽  
William Jennings Bryan ◽  
Constitutional Evolution ◽  
State Constitutional Law ◽  
Broad Understanding

In 1907, William Jennings Bryan described the proposed constitution for Oklahoma as “the best constitution in the United States today.” An enduring characteristic of Oklahoma’s constitution has been its faith in direct democracy and its root in Progressive Era politics. This book traces the historical formation and constitutional development of the state of Oklahoma. It provides commentary and analysis on the intent, politics, social and economic pressures, and the legal decisions that shaped and enhanced the Oklahoma constitution since it was adopted in 1907. The text gives a broad understanding of state constitutional law within the context of Oklahoma’s constitutional evolution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document