The Effect of Foreign Institutional Investment on Financial Reporting Comparability

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivian W. Fang ◽  
Mark G. Maffett ◽  
Bohui Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Institutional Investment ◽  
Financial Reporting Comparability

Auditor Appointment Strategy and Intragroup Value Transfers: Evidence From Family Business Groups

2021 ◽  
pp. 0148558X2199265
Author(s):  
Yan-Leung Cheung ◽  
In-Mu Haw ◽  
Weiqiang Tan ◽  
Wenming Wang
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effect ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Family Business ◽  
Business Groups ◽  
Divide And Conquer ◽  
Alternative Measure ◽  
Family Business Groups ◽  
Audit Effectiveness ◽  
Financial Reporting Comparability

Family business groups (FBGs) typically control several member firms and can hire a single auditor or multiple auditors to audit their member firms. This article examines what type of auditor appointment strategy constrains intragroup value transfers within FBGs. Analyzing related-party transactions (RPTs) within FBGs in Hong Kong, this study provides evidence that FBGs with multiple auditors undertake more intragroup value transfers than FBGs with a single auditor. However, the adverse effect of multiple-auditor appointments is mitigated by a stronger board and higher financial reporting comparability among member firms. Using an alternative measure of intragroup value transfers, we also find that the market perceives multiple-auditor appointments as impairing audit effectiveness. Overall, our findings offer the new insight that controlling families can exploit the appointment of multiple auditors as a “divide and conquer” strategy which undermines the monitoring role of auditors against intragroup value transfers, but stronger corporate governance of member firms can mitigate the adverse effect.

XBRL Tag Extensions and Tax Accrual Quality

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Walton ◽  
Liu L Yang ◽  
Yiyang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Relative Rate ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Accrual Quality ◽  
Business Reporting ◽  
Prior Literature ◽  
Tax Reporting ◽  
Financial Reporting Comparability

The adoption of eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) requires management to label all information in their firm's financial statements and corresponding notes with either standardor custom extended tags. While prior literature has found that the rate of customization is associated with increased financial reporting complexity, there could be an unintended, beneficial consequence to tax reporting. We examine how the relative use of tax-related XBRL tag extensions could highlight unique tax activity characteristics, in turn increasing tax accrual quality and improving tax reporting transparency. We find that having a higher relative rate of extended tax tags is associated with higher tax accrual quality. That is, utilizing more tax tag extensions can assist in providing useful tax information, especially when a high number of total XBRL tags are used. Our results also suggest the need to reexamine the standard taxonomy to include more tax-oriented terms to improve financial reporting comparability.

Do Global Audit Firm Networks Apply Consistent Audit Methodologies across Jurisdictions? Evidence from Financial Reporting Comparability

2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 151-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Ege ◽  
Young Hoon Kim ◽  
Dechun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Cash Flows ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Global Network ◽  
Global Networks ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
Operating Cash Flows ◽  
Audit Firms ◽  
Financial Reporting Comparability

ABSTRACT Brand name audit firms are global networks of local audit firms. These networks claim to enforce consistent audit methodologies across their member firms, which, if true, should systematically affect client financial reporting. We find that clients from different countries have more (less) comparable accruals when they are audited by local audit firms from the same global network (different global networks). Furthermore, inferences are similar when we examine client accrual comparability around audit firm switches induced by the failure of Andersen, which serves as a shock that helps improve identification. In falsification tests, having auditors from the same global network is not associated with differences in operating cash flows. Results also suggest that the role of global network methodologies in global financial reporting comparability is more pronounced across stronger investor protection jurisdictions and across jurisdictions that have adopted International Standards on Auditing. JEL Classifications: M41; M42.

Firm Life Cycle and Financial Reporting Comparability

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Haewon Moon ◽  
Eunhye Jo ◽  
Kwan Choi
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Firm Life Cycle ◽  
Financial Reporting Comparability

Mandatory IFRS Adoption and Institutional Investment Decisions

2012 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 1993-2025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annita Florou ◽  
Peter F. Pope
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Data Availability ◽  
Market Outcomes ◽  
Institutional Investment ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
Institutional Holdings ◽  
Reporting Incentives ◽  
Annual Reporting ◽  
Commercial Sources ◽  
First Time

ABSTRACT We examine whether the mandatory introduction of International Financial Reporting Standards leads to an increase in institutional investor demand for equities. Using a large ownership database covering all types of institutional investors from around the world, we find that institutional holdings increase for mandatory IFRS adopters. Changes in holdings are concentrated around first-time annual reporting events. Second, we document that the positive IFRS effects on institutional holdings are concentrated among investors whose orientation and styles suggest they are most likely to benefit from higher quality financial statements, including active, value, and growth investors. These results are consistent with holdings changes being associated with the financial reporting regime change. Finally, we show that increased institutional holdings are concentrated in countries in which enforcement and reporting incentives are strongest, and where the differences between local GAAP and IFRS are relatively high. Overall, our study helps shed new light on the channels by which IFRS information becomes impounded in market outcomes. JEL Classifications: G11; K22; M41; M42. Data Availability: The data used in this study are available from the commercial sources identified in the paper.

Effects of the SEC's XBRL mandate on financial reporting comparability

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 29-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandip Dhole ◽  
Gerald J. Lobo ◽  
Sagarika Mishra ◽  
Ananda M. Pal
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Reporting Comparability
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document