Sąžiningumo principas Lietuvos sutarčių teisėje (Good Faith Principle in Lithuanian Contract Law)

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stasys Drazdauskas
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Andrews Neil

There is some judicial interest in recognizing a principle of good faith performance in English contract law (the topic was introduced at [2.69]). The idea is gaining, or at least might gain, momentum. But the traditional view, to which the appellate courts in England and Wales have remained loyal, is that there is no general doctrine that contracts must be performed in good faith. In other words, there is no general implied term that a contract must be performed in good faith.


Author(s):  
Hiroyuki KIHARA

This chapter examines how Japanese contract law deals with extremely one-sided, onerous, or otherwise unfair terms, such as exclusions or limitations of liability, penalty clauses, or restraint of trade clauses. It discusses the overt judicial control of such terms under specific legislation, sometimes targeted exclusively at standard terms or consumer contracts. It also analyses how the Japanese courts have exercised a more indirect control by employing traditional general contract law doctrines, such as public policy, good faith, interpretation, or the rules on procedural fairness, in order to protect parties against the imposition of unfair terms. A number of hypothetical clauses are analysed to illustrate how Japanese courts regulate unfair contract terms in practice.


Author(s):  
Ewan McKendrick

This chapter begins with a definition of ‘breach of contract’ and then outlines the circumstances in which a breach of contract gives to the innocent party a right to terminate further performance of the contract. These include breach of a condition and breach of an intermediate term where the consequences of the breach are sufficiently serious. The chapter also considers the problems that can arise in deciding the status of a term which has not been classified by the parties as a condition, a warranty, or an intermediate term. It examines termination clauses and the significance attached to the good faith of the party who is alleged to have repudiated the contract. The chapter includes a brief comparison of English law with the Vienna Convention and with the Principles of European Contract Law, and also addresses the question of whether an innocent party is obligated to exercise its right to terminate further performance of the contract, and considers the loss of the right to terminate. It concludes with a discussion of the law of anticipatory breach of contract.


Author(s):  
Mindy Chen-Wishart

English law does not currently recognise a general duty of good faith, but this position is increasingly being challenged. In addition, good faith informs a diverse range of legal doctrines and principles. This chapter addresses the following: the meaning of good faith; good faith in current contract law; and the nature of good faith. It further considers whether English law should recognise a general good faith doctrine and the difference this might make to various aspects of the law.


2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Bernd Schäfer ◽  
Hüseyin Can Aksoy
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Vogenauer Stefan

This commentary focuses on Article 1.7, which obliges the parties to a contract to ‘act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing’. The imposition of this duty corresponds to a global trend towards an increasing role for the standard of good faith in contract law that has been emerging for several decades. To a certain extent, the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (PICC) help to reinforce this trend. Art 1.7 spells out the scope of the obligation to act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing; standard of good faith and fair dealing, including ethical standard and standard employed ‘in international trade’; consequences of failure to act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing; and burden of proof.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-373
Author(s):  
Mitja Kovac ◽  
Cristina Poncibò

Abstract The problem of excuse for non-performance of contracts caused by changed circumstances is, despite its long history in contract law scholarship, far from being resolved. This paper is based on the dialogue between two colleagues from different academic backgrounds and comparatively investigates German, French, Italian and English approaches and current developments in the field. First, the paper questions whether the doctrine of changed circumstances (or imprévision) remains a mere exception, or whether it is possible to argue that, by considering the latest developments, it may represent a model in European contract law. This issue has recently attracted the attention of the French legislature in its modernization of the Code Civil. Second, by examining the many different national doctrines, the paper aims to reconstruct and clarify, through comparative analysis performed, the conceptual framework of such a theory by discussing, in particular, issues of contract interpretation, presupposition, causation, good faith, fairness and solidarity.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-265
Author(s):  
Nak-Hyun Han ◽  
◽  
Seok-Beom Choi ◽  
Jung-Han Bae ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document