Accounting Education Research: Ranking Institutions, Ph.D. Programs, and Individual Scholars

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noah Myers ◽  
Kyle Shields ◽  
Scott L. Summers ◽  
David A. Wood
Keyword(s):  
Education Research ◽  
Accounting Education ◽  
Research Ranking

Accounting Education Research: Ranking Institutions and Individual Scholars

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Kip Holderness ◽  
Noah M. Myers ◽  
Scott L. Summers ◽  
David A. Wood
Keyword(s):  
Education Research ◽  
Accounting Education ◽  
Data Availability ◽  
Institutional Factors ◽  
Academic Institutions ◽  
Accounting Research ◽  
Research Ranking ◽  
Jel Classifications

ABSTRACT Previous rankings of accounting literature have largely ignored the subtopic of accounting education research. Given the important role that rankings play in creating incentives and benchmarks, ranking education research may improve both the quality and quantity of research in this subtopic. This paper ranks academic institutions and individual accounting researchers based on their production of accounting education research. We show that the correlation between education research rankings and singular, noneducation research rankings is very low (i.e., ranges from 0.20 to 0.31), emphasizing the importance of considering education rankings separately from other topical areas in accounting research. We also provide evidence of the institutional factors that contribute to producing accounting education research and when professors produce this type of research in their careers. These findings will likely be of interest to current faculty, administrators, and industry leaders as they make decisions based on accounting education research. JEL Classifications: M4; M40; M41; M49. Data Availability: Requests for data may be made to the authors.

scholarly journals THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEARNING SETS AND RESEARCH METHODOLOGY MODULE USING PROBLEM BASED LEARNING FOR ACCOUNTING EDUCATION STUDENTS

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Partono Thomas ◽  
Ahmad Nurkhin
Keyword(s):  
Education Research ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Accounting Education ◽  
State University ◽  
Education Students ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Learning Instruction ◽  
Innovative Learning ◽  
Education Research Methodology

<p>Improving the learning process is very important for every lecturer by implement innovative learning methods or media. The purpose of this study is to develop a research methodology learning instruction and module based of problem based learning for accounting education students. This research applied research and development design in the research methodology course in Economics Education (Accounting) Department, Faculty Of Economics, Semarang State University. Data analysis was used to test the products through expert opinion (lecturer) and the feedback from students. The results show have been produced and tested two products, namely units lecture event and accounting education research methodology modules that implement problem-based learning methods. Some experts and students give positive feedback about the products.</p><p><strong>Keywords: </strong>problem  based learning, modul, accounting education research methodology<strong></strong></p>

The Canfield Learning Styles Inventory: An Assessment of Its Usefulness in Accounting Education Research

2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara J. Eide ◽  
Marshall A. Geiger ◽  
Bill N. Schwartz
Keyword(s):  
Education Research ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Critical Evaluation ◽  
Internal Consistency Reliability ◽  
Accounting Education ◽  
Learning Styles Inventory ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Recent reviews of accounting education research have called for continued assessment of learning style inventories in accounting contexts (Geiger and Boyle 1992; Rebele et al. 1998). This study presents a critical evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Canfield Learning Styles Inventory (LSI), proposed by Francis et al. (1995) as an instrument for possible use by accounting educators. The study administered two versions (standard and scrambled) to 531 accounting majors from eight universities, applying a test-retest strategy after a 4–5 week interval. The versions were examined for internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, classification stability, and construct validity. We found moderate internal consistency (item analyses scores weaker than those reported by Canfield [1988]) and a substantial amount of learner-type classification instability across the two administrations. In terms of construct validity, two-factor solutions were not consistent with those reported by Canfield (1988). Further, three-factor solutions also were not consistent with Canfield's three learning domains. Therefore, along with limited theoretical support and the lack of empirical justification, we find little support for the use of the Canfield LSI in accounting education research.

Lessons for the Classroom from Luca Pacioli

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Sangster ◽  
Gregory N. Stoner ◽  
Patricia A. McCarthy
Keyword(s):  
Education Research ◽  
Classroom Instruction ◽  
Accounting Education ◽  
Changing Environment ◽  
Accounting History ◽  
Luca Pacioli ◽  
Environment And Behavior ◽  
Textbook Writing ◽  
And Behavior

In 2006, the Teaching and Curriculum Section of the American Accounting Association published a monograph, Reflections on Accounting Education Research. It includes a chapter that demonstrates how research into accounting history can be used in the classroom to inform “students about the changing environment and behavior that influences accounting action.” This paper seeks to broaden the applicability of accounting history to accounting education by demonstrating that there are lessons to be learned in both textbook writing and in classroom instruction from the earliest known accounting textbook, the bookkeeping treatise contained within Luca Pacioli's Summa de Arithmetica, Geometria, Proportioni et Proportionalita.

Accounting-education trends by authors from Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 390-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Bernardi ◽  
Taylor L. Delande ◽  
Kimberly A. Zamojcin
Keyword(s):  
Education Research ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Accounting Education ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Accounting Faculty ◽  
Journal Rankings ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Uk

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the trends in accounting-education publications and the influence of journal rankings for authors from Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the UK. Design/methodology/approach – The authors included the publications in ten accounting-education journals for the 20-year period from 1993 to 2012. Findings – The data provide insights into the perceptions of accounting-education journals by authors from four countries. The authors found that, while the use of Accounting Education as a publication outlet for accounting authors from Australia and the UK was relatively stable, the use of Accounting Education as a publication outlet increased (decreased) for the accounting authors from New Zealand (Canada). The authors also found that, while coauthoring by the accounting authors from Australia and the UK increased slightly, coauthoring by the accounting authors from Canada and New Zealand increased during the 20-year period. Research limitations/implications – The data suggests a tendency by the authors from these four countries to publish their accounting-education research in journals that had been ranked as a top accounting journal. Originality/value – This paper is the first paper to consider trends in international accounting-education publications. The data in this research can be used by accounting faculty wishing to assess which journals their colleagues publish in most frequently.

Online Homework versus Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Pedagogical Support for Transaction Analysis and Recording

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred Phillips ◽  
Benny G. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Education Research ◽  
Intelligent Tutoring Systems ◽  
Intelligent Tutoring ◽  
Intelligent Tutoring System ◽  
Accounting Education ◽  
Online Homework ◽  
Learning Effects ◽  
Tutoring System ◽  
Tutoring Systems ◽  
Transaction Analysis

ABSTRACT: Prior research demonstrates that students learn more from homework practice when using online homework or intelligent tutoring systems than a paper-and-pencil format. However, no accounting education research directly compares the learning effects of online homework systems with the learning effects of intelligent tutoring systems. This paper presents a quasi-experiment that compares the two systems and finds that students’ transaction analysis performance increased at a significantly faster rate when they used an intelligent tutoring system rather than an online homework system. Implications for accounting instructors and researchers are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document