Copyright, Free Speech, and the Public's Right to Know: How Journalists Think About Fair Use

Author(s):  
Patricia Aufderheide ◽  
Peter A. Jaszi ◽  
Katie Bieze ◽  
Jan Lauren Boyles
Keyword(s):  
Fair Use ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 875-890
Author(s):  
Patricia Aufderheide ◽  
Jan Lauren Boyles ◽  
Katie Bieze
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-139
Author(s):  
Peter. Jaszi ◽  
Patricia. Aufderheide

Author(s):  
John Attanasio

In Kovacs v. Cooper, the Supreme Court permitted government to regulate the volume of sound trucks. One opinion stated that free speech does not include freedom “to drown out the natural speech of others.” Campaign speech of by interests drowns out all other campaign speech. This problem heavily distorts both the speaker’s right to speak and the listener’s right to know. The distortions disadvantage poorly financed candidates and mislead voters. What people think are the most important issues will be distorted; so will intensity of feelings on those issues. Such distortions will systematically skew electoral behavior based on false information. These distortions impair distributive autonomy of both listeners and speakers. In 2016, both presidential candidates overwhelmingly catered to wealthy donors. In this milieu, wealthy donors comprise the political “in” group; that is, the group who dominates government. Everyone else (the vast majority of voters) is a political “out.”


2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shlomit Pery ◽  
Simon Wein

Should terminal patients know about their impending deaths? How much should they know? How do we determine “should”?


2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-170
Author(s):  
Alan Knight

Australian governments have made continuing attempts to restrict the public’s right to know. This article looks back to 1968 when radical Queensland university students challenged state government restrictions on freedom of speech, assembly and information. They did so by using then new offset press technology to create alternatives to a mainstream press monopoly. In a world without internet, community radio and television, or even mobile phones, leaflets and small newspapers were the primary media for such minority groups wishing to spread their critiques to the wider community. The article examines the radical newsletter’s themes including freedom of speech, civil liberties, Australian racism, press ownership and the anti-war movement. It includes references to Queensland produced cartoons and posters. It was produced with material from the Fryer Library at the University of Queensland.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document