Gender Differences in Bargaining Outcomes: A Field Experiment on Discrimination

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Castillo ◽  
Ragan Petrie ◽  
Maximo A. Torero ◽  
Lise Vesterlund
Author(s):  
Sule Alan ◽  
Seda Ertac ◽  
Elif Kubilay ◽  
Gyongyi Loranth

Abstract Using data from a large-scale field experiment, we show that while there is no gender difference in the willingness to make risky decisions on behalf of a group in a sample of children, a large gap emerges in a sample of adolescents. The proportion of girls who exhibit leadership willingness drops by 39% going from childhood to adolescence. We explore the possible factors behind this drop and find that it is largely associated with a dramatic decline in “social confidence”, measured by the willingness to perform a real effort task in public.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Castillo ◽  
Ragan Petrie ◽  
Máximo Torero ◽  
Lise Vesterlund

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Porter ◽  
Danila Serra

We conducted a field experiment aimed at increasing the percentage of women majoring in economics. We exposed students enrolled in introductory classes to successful and charismatic women who majored in economics at the same university. The intervention significantly impacted female students’ enrollment in further economics classes, increasing their likelihood to major in economics by 8 percentage points. This is a large effect, given that only 9 percent of women were majoring in economics at baseline. Since the impacted women were previously planning to major in lower-earning fields, our low-cost intervention may have a positive effect on their future incomes. (JEL A22, C93, I23, I26, J16)


2013 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. 35-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Castillo ◽  
Ragan Petrie ◽  
Maximo Torero ◽  
Lise Vesterlund

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 375-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jen Shang ◽  
Americus Reed ◽  
Adrian Sargeant ◽  
Kathryn Carpenter

A demonstration field experiment in a live-radio fund drive shows that women (but not men) primed with moral traits give about 20% more. The authors test one understudied explanation for this finding: gender differences in how market behavior (e.g., giving and supporting a nonprofit) shrinks moral identity discrepancy (i.e., the gap between actual and ideal moral identity). Field Survey 1 demonstrates the basic effect: the less money women (but not men) have historically given on average to a nonprofit, the larger their moral identity discrepancy. Field Experiment 2 shows a managerial implication of this basic effect: when primed with moral identity, women (but not men) who have supported the nonprofit less frequently in the past are more likely to follow an emailed link to help the nonprofit again. Study 3 tests one possible pathway underpinning this finding: even though giving makes women and men experience similar feelings of encouragement and uplift and similar reinforcement of their moral identity, only women with larger prebehavior moral identity discrepancy consequently shrink this discrepancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document