Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu’nun ‘Kurumsal Yönetim’ Konulu Tebliğleri Ile Ilgili Genel Değerlendirme Ve Yorum (An Assessment of the Recent Legal Reforms Concerning 'Corporate Governance' Introduced by the Capital Market Boards of Turkey)

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melsa Ararat ◽  
B. Burcin Yurtoglu
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 18-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Dilger ◽  
Ute Schottmüller-Einwag

We examine how corporate governance reporting corresponds to actual conduct regarding severance payment caps for prematurely departing members of executive boards in Germany. Firstly, we evaluate the declarations of conformity for all companies listed in the CDAX between 2010 and 2014, which we use to determine conformity and deviation rates, and analyse the reasons for deviation, contributing to current research on comparative corporate governance, which focuses on when, why and how companies deviate from legitimate corporate governance goals (Aguilera, Judge, & Terjesen, 2018). Secondly, we assess the compensation amounts of all severance payments made and published by DAX companies to compare the respective severance ratio with the cap recommended by the German Corporate Governance Code (GCGC). We find that more than 20% of companies listed in the CDAX declared deviation in the declaration of conformity. Moreover, in 57% of actual severance cases where DAX companies had previously declared their conformity, the cap was exceeded. Yet, none of the companies that had exceeded the cap disclosed this in the following declaration of conformity. In most cases, the corporate reports deviated from reality and therefore could not serve as a suitable basis for decisions by the capital market.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-33
Author(s):  
Slobodan Marin ◽  
Rade Tešić ◽  
Milan Šušić

A quality corporate governance system is a basic prerequisite for a sustainable growth economy, more easily increasing the efficiency of the economic system and guaranteeing access to external sources of capital. The level of quality of corporate governance can be defined as the degree of fulfillment of set standards of corporate governance defined at the international and national institutional level. In the new, modern business conditions, with strong dynamic changes in the social and business environment, modern corporate companies, ie their management bodies, are taking on new characteristics, adapting to new requirements and challenges. In this sense, the new demanding business conditions require continuous improvement of corporate governance potential. Based on previous theoretical and empirical knowledge, Bosnia and Herzegovina has the characteristics of a closed corporate governance system in both entities, so, as a basis for developing models for measuring the level of corporate governance, selected models that measure corporate governance in countries with typical closed corporate governance systems. A significant number of studies show that corporations that achieve higher standards and better corporate governance practices also have better business performance results and thus greater value in the capital market. This means that corporations with a higher level of corporate governance also have better financial operating results, easier access to financial capital, and greater value in the capital market. The main purpose of the research is to determine the level of influence of the quality of corporate governance on business performance, ie to determine whether corporations that had good corporate governance had higher business liquidity and vice versa. The main goal of the research is to establish the link and relationship between quality and corporate performance management indicators of the corporation's business.


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faleh Salem al-Kahtani

This article will investigate the current disclosure and transparency practices in the Saudi corporate governance system. The purpose of this article is to examine whether the disclosure and transparency requirements are satisfied, adequate and respected by the Saudi listed corporations. The disclosure and transparency prerequisites are also measured, and some of the main facets that have been sustained until now by the listed corporations are explored. In particular, a variety of the main disclosure and transparency ideologies that have been violated by some of the listed corporations are provided. In additional, the significance of disclosure and transparency in company annual reports is debated. The Capital Market Authority Board has consequently imposed fines on listed corporations responsible for violations. The Capital Market Authority Board has taken the defamation approach as punishment for such listed corporations.


2018 ◽  
Vol Volume-2 (Issue-5) ◽  
pp. 1055-1061
Author(s):  
Mayank Goyal ◽  
Dipanshu Mishra ◽  

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 245-282
Author(s):  
Ricardo Adriano Antonelli ◽  
Ademir Clemente ◽  
Romualdo Douglas Colauto

Resumo: Neste artigo teve-se como objetivo analisar a influência das notícias relacionadas ao mercado de capitais na determinação da janela do evento para adesões e migrações aos Níveis Diferenciados de Governança Corporativa (NDGCs) da B3 (Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão). A metodologia emprega quatro etapas: determinação do melhor tamanho da janela para 104 empresas; análise do tamanho das janelas consideradas outliers; análise qualitativa das notícias referentes à janela do evento para os outliers, com base no Bloomberg®; e aplicação do Estudo de Eventos para os casos considerados outliers. Os resultados encontrados indicaram uma tendência de pequenas janelas, limitadas a 5-5 dias para cerca de 59,6% dos casos. Para os 42 casos considerados outliers, isto é, janela maior que 5-5 dias, foram encontradas notícias para 61,9%, dos quais apenas 6 casos apresentaram dummies significativas no Estudo de Eventos. A metodologia utilizada conseguiu explicar 68 casos em que houve adesão, migração ou notícia.Palavras-chave: Governança Corporativa. Estudo de eventos. Janelas de eventos. Notícias. Capital market news and windows of events for accessions and migrations to NDGCs Abstract: This article aims to analyze the influence of news related to the capital market in determining the window of the event for accessions and migrations to the BM&FBovespa NDGCs. Four steps are followed: determinig the best size of the window for 104 companies; analysing the size of the Windows which are considered outliers; qualitative analysis of the news related to the window of events for outliers, based on Bloomberg®; and application of the Event Studies for the cases considered outliers. The results of the study indicated a tendency of small windows, limited to 5-5 days for about 59.6% of the cases. For the 42 cases considered outliers, i.e, window bigger than 5-5 days, news was found for 61.9%, from which just 6 ones got meaningful dummies in the Event Study. Even though, the applied methodology succeded explaining 68 of the cases in which there was accession, migration or news.Keywords: Corporate Governance. Windows of Events. Janelas de eventos. News.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justice Srem-Sai

Ghana's capital market is greatly undervalued, extremely concentrated and widely divorced from the country's actual economy. Investors prefer sole proprietorships and closely held businesses, and are antipathetic towards the capital market. This article seeks to implicate the state as the main cause of this antipathy. The article will argue that this antipathy is a consequence of the repeated failure of the state-owned or state-controlled enterprises or corporations (collectively referred to as ‘SOEs’). It will, through real-life cases, also show that the failure of SOEs in Ghana is as a result of bad corporate governance practices by the state in respect of wholly state-owned corporations and, later, in corporations in which the state became a controlling shareholder. The article, further, attempts to link the economic challenges in Ghana to the failure of its SOEs.


2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 26-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Lopes Cardoso ◽  
André Carlos Busanelli de Aquino ◽  
Jose Elias Feres de Almeida ◽  
Antonio Jose Barbosa das Neves

This study investigates if the level of discretionary accruals (DAs) is different for companies whose corporate governance level is certified by Bovespa compared to those ones that are not. And also for companies whose stocks negotiated at Bovespa have high liquidity compared to the ones with low liquidity. The main purpose is to comprehend the phenomenon of accounting choices (measured as DAs), its incentives and counter-incentives. In this context, the issues were: i) Is there any difference of DAs intensity between certified and non-certified companies, considering the corporate governance level?; ii) Is there any difference of DAs intensity with high liquidity stocks at Bovespa and those ones with low liquidity? This research took into consideration Jones` original model (1991), a sample with 1,791 observations collected from 1997 to 2004. Empirical results from our study show that there is no significant statistic difference in the level of DAs between the firms listed or not in the corporate governance index. This suggests the need to consider incentives and counter-incentives from the capital market to those different set of firms, in relation with accounting choices


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo-Joon Chae ◽  
Kwang-Wook Oh

This study examined whether there were differences in the credit ratings of family firms, one type of business ownership and corporate governance in Korea. Credit rating agencies which evaluate a company's ability to pay back the debt play a key role in evaluating corporate values in the capital market. A variety of standards are applied to evaluate corporate credit ratings. The corporate governance structure is also under consideration. Credit rating agencies may give excellent credit ratings to family firms if they judge that family companies have efficient governance structures resulting in lower agency costs as companies which try to match minority shareholders' interests. On the other hand, they may give lower credit ratings to family firms if they judge that family firms have a negative impact on firm performance. In this context, this study planned to investigate how credit rating agencies constituting the mainstay in the evaluation of corporate values with analysts judged the roles of family firms which had been controversial in previous studies in the capital market, and present direct results.


2003 ◽  
pp. 95-101
Author(s):  
O. Khmyz

Acording to the author's opinion, institutional investors (from many participants of the capital market) play the main role, especially investment funds. They supply to small-sized investors special investment services, which allow them to participate in the investment process. However excessive institutialization and increasing number of hedge-funds may lead to financial crisis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document