What’s Wrong with Dodd-Frank 1502? Conflict Minerals, Civilian Livelihoods, and The Unintended Consequences of Western Advocacy

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Seay
Keyword(s):  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Conflict Minerals

Unintended Consequences of Sanctions for Human Rights: Conflict Minerals and Infant Mortality

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 731-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominic P. Parker ◽  
Jeremy D. Foltz ◽  
David Elsea
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Infant Mortality ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Conflict Minerals

scholarly journals An Unintended Legacy: The External Policy Responses of the USA and European Union to Conflict Minerals in Africa

Laws ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Michael Addaney ◽  
Emma Charlene Lubaale
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Natural Resources ◽  
Common Knowledge ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Business Practices ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Conflict Minerals ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights

Competition over environmental and natural resources characteristically lies at the heart of armed conflicts in Africa. It is also common knowledge that some companies dealing in products such as laptops, smart phones, and jewellery import minerals from conflict-affected areas, thereby indirectly fuelling conflicts in these areas or undermining human rights. For a continent endowed with natural resources including minerals, Africa has suffered the brunt of this predicament. This state of affairs has lent impetus to the adoption of several regulations geared towards curbing irresponsible business practices by companies relying on such minerals, the goal being, amongst others, to guarantee the protection of human rights. In May 2017, the European Union adopted regulations intended to stop the importation of conflict minerals in Europe, debatably making giant strides in the direction of the protection of human rights. These regulations are to come into force in 2021. However, can these regulations advance the much-desired goal of the protection of human rights in Africa on issues pertaining to conflict minerals? By analyzing the 2017 EU regulations in light of previous regulations of a similar nature, the paper concludes that the said regulations constitute a weak normative framework and could in fact have unintended consequences on the fundamental rights of civilians in natural resource-rich conflict areas of Africa.

scholarly journals An Unintended Legacy: The External Policy Responses of the US and European Union to Conflict Minerals in Africa

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Addaney ◽  
Emma Charlene Lubaale
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Natural Resources ◽  
Common Knowledge ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Business Practices ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Conflict Minerals ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights

Competition over environmental and natural resources characteristically lies at the heart of armed conflicts in Africa. It is also common knowledge that some companies dealing in products such as laptops, smart phones and jewellery; import minerals from conflict-affected areas, thereby indirectly fuelling conflicts in these areas or undermining human rights. For a continent endowed with natural resources including minerals, Africa has suffered the brunt of this predicament. This state of affairs has lent impetus to the adoption of several regulations geared towards curbing irresponsible business practices by companies relying on such minerals, the goal being, amongst others, to guarantee the protection of human rights. In May 2017, the European Union adopted Regulations intended to stop the importation of conflict minerals in Europe, debatably making giant strides in the direction of protection of human rights. These Regulations are to come into force in 2021. However, can these regulations advance the much-desired goal of protection of human rights in Africa on issues pertaining to conflict minerals? By analyzing the 2017 EU Regulations in light of previous regulations of a similar nature, the paper concludes that the said regulations constitute a weak normative framework and could in fact have unintended consequences on the fundamental rights of civilians in natural resource-rich conflict areas of Africa.

Strategic colorblindness: The paradox of unintended consequences

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan P. Apfelbaum ◽  
Samuel R. Sommers ◽  
Michael I. Norton
Keyword(s):  
Unintended Consequences
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document