Globalization, Country Governance, and Corporate Investment Decisions: An Analysis of Cross-Border Acquisitions

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse A. Ellis ◽  
Sara B. Moeller ◽  
Frederik P. Schlingemann ◽  
Rene M. Stulz
Keyword(s):  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Corporate Investment ◽  
Cross Border

scholarly journals Economic policy uncertainty and investment in Spain

SERIEs ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Dejuan-Bitria ◽  
Corinna Ghirelli
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effect ◽  
Economic Policy ◽  
Strong Evidence ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Corporate Investment ◽  
Precautionary Savings ◽  
Marginal Effect ◽  
Policy Uncertainty ◽  
Economic Policy Uncertainty ◽  
High Uncertainty

AbstractThe aim of this paper is to investigate the effect of economic policy uncertainty on firms’ investment decisions. We focus on Spain for the period 1998–2014. To measure policy-related uncertainty, we borrow the economic policy uncertainty (EPU) indicator available for this country. We find strong evidence that uncertainty reduces corporate investment. This relationship appears to be nonlinear, being the marginal effect of uncertainty attenuated toward zero during periods of high uncertainty levels. Furthermore, the heterogeneous results suggest that the adverse effect of uncertainty is particularly relevant for highly vulnerable firms. Overall, these results are consistent with the hypotheses that economic policy-related uncertainty reduces corporate investment through increases in precautionary savings or to worsening of credit conditions.

scholarly journals The Effects of Securities Class Action Litigation on Corporate Liquidity and Investment Policy

2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 251-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Arena ◽  
Brandon Julio
Keyword(s):  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Market Value ◽  
Corporate Investment ◽  
Class Action ◽  
Investment Policy ◽  
Capital Expenditures ◽  
Litigation Risk ◽  
Securities Litigation ◽  
Corporate Liquidity ◽  
Temporal Effects

AbstractThe risk of securities class action litigation alters corporate savings and investment policy. Firms with greater exposure to securities litigation hold significantly more cash in anticipation of future settlements and other related costs. The result is due to firms accumulating cash in anticipation of lawsuits and not a consequence of plaintiffs targeting firms with high cash levels. The market value of cash is lower for firms exposed to litigation risk. Corporate investment decisions are also affected by litigation risk, as firms reduce capital expenditures in response. Our results are robust to endogeneity concerns and possible spurious temporal effects.

scholarly journals Behavioral CEOs: The Role of Managerial Overconfidence

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 37-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Malmendier ◽  
Geoffrey Tate
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Corporate Investment ◽  
Financing Constraints ◽  
Managerial Overconfidence ◽  
Empirical Framework

In this paper, we provide a theoretical and empirical framework that allows us to synthesize and assess the burgeoning literature on CEO overconfidence. We also provide novel empirical evidence that overconfidence matters for corporate investment decisions in a framework that explicitly addresses the endogeneity of firms' financing constraints.

The impact of board characteristics on corporate investment decisions: an empirical study

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Kwame Agyei-Mensah
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Corporate Investment ◽  
Independent Directors ◽  
Investment Efficiency ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Board Characteristics ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of board characteristics on firms’ investment decisions. Design Methodology Approach The study used data sourced from annual reports of firms listed on the Ghana Stock Exchange from 2014 to 2018. Descriptive analysis was performed to provide the background statistics of the variables examined. This was followed by a regression analysis which forms the main data analysis. Findings The multiple regression analysis results indicated that the proportion of independent directors and financial experts on the board are negatively related to firm investment. These findings imply that independent directors and financial experts on the board can help firms reduce overinvestment and improve investment efficiency. Originality Value The extant literature shows that the board of directors are an effective mechanism to reduce agency problems in firm decisions and operating performance. However, there has been little research on the role of the board of directors in corporate investment policy.

Better risk pricing can unlock billions in investment

2018 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Direct Investment ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Political Risk ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Percentage Points ◽  
Risk Pricing ◽  
The Cost

Subject Pricing political risk. Significance The mis-measurement of political risk is resulting in the cost of capital being valued 2-4 percentage points higher than it should be in assessments ahead of cross-border investment decisions. Research suggests that in 2016 this could have increased net foreign direct investment (FDI) to non-advanced countries by more than 10%. Impacts Political risk measurement is set for a renaissance, with interest from practitioners and end-users likely to proliferate. Frontier markets that are on the edge of inclusion in 'emerging' portfolio allocations could see an uptick in investment inflows. Returns to long-term capital managers, from insurers to pension funds, will rise as cost-of-capital calculations grow in sophistication.

Besteuerungsprinzipien und effektive Unternehmenssteuerbelastungen in der Europäischen Union: Regelt sich die EU-weite Steuerharmonisierung von selbst?

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Elschner ◽  
Jost H. Heckemeyer ◽  
Christoph Spengel
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Corporate Tax ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Tax Regimes ◽  
Country Specific ◽  
The Eu

AbstractEU law demands that the allocation of factors and goods within the European Union shall not be distorted by taxes. Efforts to formally harmonize corporate tax regimes in Europe have, however, stalled in recent years. What is more, the source principle has prevailed over residence based taxation which is seen to be more in line with EU law. Tax induced distortions of cross-border investment decisions are supposed to be the consequence. Based on country-specific effective average tax rates from 1998 to 2009, this article shows that there is, however, non-coordinated convergence of tax burdens within the EU. Thus, distortions of cross-border investment decisions are limited and decreasing even without formal harmonization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document