Board Independence, Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ke Li ◽  
Lei Lu ◽  
Usha R. Mittoo ◽  
Zhou Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Performance ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Board Independence

Board structure, board committees and corporate performance in Russia

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
pp. 1073-1092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Berezinets ◽  
Yulia Ilina ◽  
Anna Cherkasskaya
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Performance ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Panel Data Analysis ◽  
Gender Diversity ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Company Performance ◽  
Public Companies ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Board Committees

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the link between board structure and performance of public companies in Russia – an emerging market with unique institutional background and a variability of corporate governance (CG) practices across its companies. Design/methodology/approach Panel data analysis was applied on a sample of 207 Russian companies that frequently traded in the Russian Trading System during the period 2007-2011, in order to test hypotheses on the relationships between board size, board independence, gender diversity, presence of board committees and financial performance, as measured by Tobin’s Q. Findings The results show a positive relationship between Tobin’s Q and the board’s gender diversity. The analysis demonstrates that smaller and bigger boards are associated with a greater Tobin’s Q value. Originality/value The findings provide additional evidence of how board structure is related to its effectiveness and corporate performance in countries with concentrated ownership, highly variable CG practices and a lack of proper implementation of corporate law and governance codes. The paper contributes to the existing empirical evidence on the advantages of small and large-sized boards and on gender diversity, and is the first investigating the relationship between Russian companies’ board committees and market-based performance. The results regarding board independence and committees suggest that these mechanisms are still not widely recognized for their role in CG and company performance in Russia.

scholarly journals Ownership Concentration and Performance Recovery Patterns in the European Union

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Horobet ◽  
Lucian Belascu ◽  
Ștefania Curea ◽  
Alma Pentescu
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Sovereign Debt ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Corporate Performance ◽  
Manufacturing Sector ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
The European Union ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Global Financial Crisis

Our study addresses the link between ownership concentration and corporate performance in the manufacturing sector in the European Union in an economic environment stressed by the global financial and sovereign debt crises. This is, to our knowledge, the first attempt to tackle differences between companies with different origin-countries in EU from the perspective of ownership concentration and corporate performance in a period marked by the adverse impact of the global financial crisis. Ownership concentration is measured by the number of shareholders and the percentage of their individual and collective holdings, while performance is measured by accounting-based and market-based indicators. Our results, based on a detailed and methodical statistical analysis, show a clear division between Western and Eastern companies in terms of ownership concentration and performance, with an impact on businesses’ recovery patterns. Overall, there is a positive link between ownership concentration and corporate performance in the case of Western companies, but not for Eastern-based companies. Moreover, ownership concentration has supported business recovery in EU, but particularly for Western companies. On the other hand, our results suggest that market investors’ assessment of corporate performance is disconnected from business fundamentals and do not acknowledge the role of ownership concentration (either beneficial of detrimental) for performance assessment.

scholarly journals Independent Director, Executives Compensation and Corporate Performance-Correcting Self-Selection Bias by Matching Methods

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 156
Author(s):  
Yuan Chang ◽  
Pang-Tien Lieu
Keyword(s):  
Executive Compensation ◽  
Selection Bias ◽  
Corporate Performance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sample Selection ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Independent Director ◽  
Economic Consequence ◽  
Self Selection ◽  
Two Step Estimation

Based on data of listed companies on Taiwan Stock Exchange (TWSE) through 2001~2011, this paper examines whether board independence has effects on executive compensation and corporate performance. Existing studies lacked of considering self-selection of board independence in evaluating the effects of board independence on economic consequence. This may incur estimation bias because systematic factors determining firm’s introducing independent director also have influences on economic consequence. While Heckman (1979)’s two-step estimation addressed selection duo to unobservables, this paper employs propensity score matching (PSM) from Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983, 1985a,b) to address sample selection duo to observables, and forms two groups of samples, namely, firms with independent director and firms without independent director but share similar characteristics with the former. Empirical evidence from regression estimation shows divergent outcomes under before-matching versus after-matching samples. Before matching, greater degree of board independence is associated with higher profitability and higher level of total and average executive compensation. After matching, outperformance as well as overpay on executive compensation of firm with greater board independence is vanished. After controlling selection bias duo to observables versus unobservables, our evidence concludes that greater board independence is uncorrelated with greater corporate performance and executive compensation overpay.

scholarly journals Does the presence of independent directors reduce the practices of earnings management? The moderating role of family ownership concentration

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 638-654
Author(s):  
Deaa Al-Deen Al-Sraheen ◽  
Khaldoon Ahmad Al Daoud
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Family Ownership ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
New Ideas ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Moderating Role

While often criticized, the independence of directors remains a crucial criterion for evaluating the effectiveness of the monitoring role of boards. This study examines the relationship between board independence and earnings management, paying attention to moderation role of family ownership concentration on this relationship using a sample of services companies listed on Amman Stock Exchange ASE. This study documented a significant and negative association between board independence and earnings management. In addition, the moderating role of family ownership concentration on this relationship was also negative. Thus, the board’s monitoring function was inefficient due to the concentration of ownership. These results were obtained through using multiple and sequential regression analysis for the research data from 2013 to 2016. This study provides new ideas for future research such as examining the impacts of the migration of capitals and investors from neighbouring countries such as Syria and Iraq.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document