Trust in Decision-Making Authorities Dictates the Form of the Interactive Relationship Between Outcome Favorability and Procedural Fairness

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Brockner ◽  
Emily Bianchi ◽  
Kees van den Bos ◽  
Philip K. Miles ◽  
Matthias Seifert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Procedural Fairness ◽  
Outcome Favorability ◽  
Interactive Relationship

scholarly journals Trust in Decision-Making Authorities Dictates the Form of the Interactive Relationship Between Outcome Fairness and Procedural Fairness

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily C. Bianchi ◽  
Joel Brockner ◽  
Kees van den Bos ◽  
Matthias Seifert ◽  
Henry Moon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Procedural Fairness ◽  
Outcome Fairness ◽  
Interactive Relationship

A novel q-rung orthopair fuzzy TODIM approach for multi-criteria group decision making based on Shapley value and relative entropy

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 235-250
Author(s):  
Liuxin Chen ◽  
Nanfang Luo ◽  
Xiaoling Gou
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Relative Entropy ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Shapley Value ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Similarity Measures ◽  
Entropy Measure ◽  
Shapley Values ◽  
Interactive Relationship ◽  
The Difference

In the real multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) problems, there will be an interactive relationship among different decision makers (DMs). To identify the overall influence, we define the Shapley value as the DM’s weight. Entropy is a measure which makes it better than similarity measures to recognize a group decision making problem. Since we propose a relative entropy to measure the difference between two systems, which improves the accuracy of the distance measure.In this paper, a MCGDM approach named as TODIM is presented under q-rung orthopair fuzzy information.The proposed TODIM approach is developed for correlative MCGDM problems, in which the weights of the DMs are calculated in terms of Shapley values and the dominance matrices are evaluated based on relative entropy measure with q-rung orthopair fuzzy information.Furthermore, the efficacy of the proposed Gq-ROFWA operator and the novel TODIM is demonstrated through a selection problem of modern enterprises risk investment. A comparative analysis with existing methods is presented to validate the efficiency of the approach.

Procedurally fair? Fairly procedural?: … ethics, fairness and welfare practice

1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 34-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip A. Swain
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Social Workers ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Codes Of Ethics ◽  
Procedural Fairness ◽  
Professional Codes ◽  
Professional Codes Of Ethics ◽  
Procedural Ethics

This paper examines the principles of procedural fairness and their application to welfare practice. The paper considers whether social workers ought to measure the adequacy of their practice, not just against those requirements ususally set out in the professional Codes of Ethics, but also against the procedural fairness expectations of decision-making more usually the province of courts and like bodies. The paper concludes that these expectations are not only in keeping with the Code of Ethics, but that competent practice demands no less of practitioners.

Architecture-Centric Business Process’s Building and Optimization Design Supported by Volunteer-Oriented Internetware

2011 ◽  
Vol 204-210 ◽  
pp. 412-417
Author(s):  
Bao Xiang Cao ◽  
Xiao Na Xia ◽  
Ji Guo Yu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Optimization Design ◽  
Service System ◽  
The Self ◽  
Volunteer Computing ◽  
Self Awareness ◽  
Formal Models ◽  
Interactive Relationship ◽  
Service Logic

Expand the self-awareness and self-(decision-making) ability of agent, unify the definition about process, resource and service, then this paper builds volunteer-oriented agent internetware service logic, and designs the formal models’ design related to corresponding volunteer computing, furthermore, researches for its method sequentially. About architecture-centric service system, it is achieved as volunteer granularities and interactive relationship. On this basis, it gets to improve transparency of architecture about business implementation and autonomous ability of analysis decision-making.

Does Outcome Favorability Affect Procedural Fairness as a Result of Self-Serving Attributions?

2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 182-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Francis-Gladney ◽  
Nace R. Magner ◽  
Robert B. Welker
Keyword(s):  
Procedural Fairness ◽  
Outcome Favorability

Questioning the Criminal Justice Imperative

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-350
Author(s):  
Miriam Cullen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
International Criminal ◽  
Procedural Fairness ◽  
Legal Obligation ◽  
International Peace ◽  
Procedural Integrity ◽  
Council Decision ◽  
Primary Responsibility ◽  
Peace And Security ◽  
Rules Of Procedure

Abstract The Security Council’s structure as a small but powerful executive, combined with its primary responsibility for international peace and security, leads to a presumption against the application of ordinary standards of procedural fairness. At the same time, explicit provisions of the UN Charter and its own rules of procedure indicate that some balance was to be struck. This article questions whether the attainment of international criminal jurisdiction through Security Council decision-making really outweighs the need to ensure procedural integrity in every step of the process. It posits that a lack of procedural fairness in the Council’s methods of work at least undermines the justice imperative that the Council so espouses and at most violates an ancillary legal obligation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document