Social Networks, Information Acquisition, and Asset Prices

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing Han ◽  
Liyan Yang
Keyword(s):  
Social Networks ◽  
Information Acquisition ◽  
Asset Prices

scholarly journals Costly Information Acquisition, Social Networks, and Asset Prices: Experimental Evidence

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 1975-2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
EDWARD HALIM ◽  
YOHANES E. RIYANTO ◽  
NILANJAN ROY
Keyword(s):  
Social Networks ◽  
Experimental Evidence ◽  
Information Acquisition ◽  
Asset Prices ◽  
Costly Information

Social Networks, Information Acquisition, and Asset Prices

2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 1444-1457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing Han ◽  
Liyan Yang
Keyword(s):  
Social Networks ◽  
Information Acquisition ◽  
Asset Prices

Short-sale constraints, information acquisition, and asset prices

2017 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 273-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdi Nezafat ◽  
Mark Schroder ◽  
Qinghai Wang
Keyword(s):  
Information Acquisition ◽  
Asset Prices ◽  
Short Sale Constraints ◽  
Short Sale

Equilibrium Information Acquisition, Prediction Abilities and Asset Prices

2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-111
Author(s):  
Wen-Chung Guo ◽  
Sy-Ming Guu ◽  
Ting-Yun Chang
Keyword(s):  
Information Acquisition ◽  
Asset Prices

Diversity, complexity, and structure of social networks: Study of a smallholder dairy project

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-255
Author(s):  
Sreeram Vishnu ◽  
Jancy Gupta ◽  
Subash Surendran Padmaja
Keyword(s):  
Social Networks ◽  
Information Acquisition ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Centrality Measures ◽  
Household Level ◽  
Comparison Results ◽  
Smallholder Dairy ◽  
Actor Networks ◽  
The Right

Network structures have drawn a lot of research interest in recent years. However, little is known about how the diversity, complexity, and structure of the multi-actor networks associated with a project shapes information exchange and linkages in different contexts. This study, conducted in 2017, addresses this deficiency by analyzing the social networks in three villages, and it was directly set up in response to operationalizing a smallholder dairy development project. Social network analysis was used to characterize the networks and to look into network configuration and information exchange dynamics. Data were collected through household-level interviews with the project’s participant farmers and key project stakeholders, supplemented with other Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) techniques. Analysis focused on network visualization and estimation of specific network parameters for comparison. Results indicated that public sector actors were the key drivers in all these smallholder networks. Flow of information was favored both vertically and horizontally in the network, which was configured at a later stage, rather than in the project piloting stages, owing to unique actor alignment and multiplicity of ties. The networks were also found to vary in terms of some of the network attributes, signaling varying levels of network integration and brokerage potential. Better cohesiveness and information spread was observed in the network, which had the right mix of information acquisition and exchange networks. The study offers valuable lessons with respect to connectedness of network actors, need for multi-actor alliance, and implication of centrality measures in determining network dynamics.

scholarly journals Illiquidity and All Its Friends

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Tirole
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Selection ◽  
Systemic Risk ◽  
Information Acquisition ◽  
Asset Prices ◽  
Balance Sheet ◽  
Market Value ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Fire Sales ◽  
Liquidity Provision

The recent crisis was characterized by massive illiquidity. This paper reviews what we know and don't know about illiquidity and all its friends: market freezes, fire sales, contagion, and ultimately insolvencies and bailouts. It first explains why liquidity cannot easily be apprehended through a single statistic, and asks whether liquidity should be regulated given that a capital adequacy requirement is already in place. The paper then analyzes market breakdowns due to either adverse selection or shortages of financial muscle, and explains why such breakdowns are endogenous to balance sheet choices and to information acquisition. It then looks at what economics can contribute to the debate on systemic risk and its containment. Finally, the paper takes a macroeconomic perspective, discusses shortages of aggregate liquidity, and analyzes how market value accounting and capital adequacy should react to asset prices. It concludes with a topical form of liquidity provision, monetary bailouts and recapitalizations, and analyzes optimal combinations thereof; it stresses the need for macro-prudential policies. (JEL E44, G01, G21, G28, G32, L51)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document