Franchisor Failure: An Assessment of the Adequacy of Regulatory Response

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny M. Buchan
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Response

scholarly journals The GLC7 type 1 protein phosphatase is required for glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 6789-6796 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Tu ◽  
M Carlson
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Genetic Analysis ◽  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Glucose Repression ◽  
Regulatory Mechanisms ◽  
Genetic Studies ◽  
Glycogen Accumulation ◽  
Regulatory Response

We cloned the GLC7/DIS2S1 gene by complementation of the cid1-226 mutation, which relieves glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. GLC7 encodes the catalytic subunit of type 1 protein phosphatase (PP1). Genetic analysis and sequencing showed that cid1-226 is an allele of GLC7, now designated glc7-T152K, which alters threonine 152 to lysine. We also show that the glc7-1 and glc7-T152K alleles cause distinct phenotypes: glc7-1 causes a severe defect in glycogen accumulation but does not relieve glucose repression, whereas glc7-T152K does not prevent glycogen accumulation. These findings are discussed in light of evidence that interaction with different regulatory or targeting subunits directs the participation of PP1 in diverse cellular regulatory mechanisms. Finally, genetic studies suggest that PP1 functions antagonistically to the SNF1 protein kinase in the regulatory response to glucose.

CFTC overhauls customer protection requirements

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Design Methodology ◽  
Commodity Futures ◽  
Regulatory Regime ◽  
Futures Trading ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Regulatory Response ◽  
Market Participants ◽  
Policies And Procedures ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to summarize the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) recent overhaul of its customer protection rules, which regulate how futures commission merchants (FCMs) and derivatives clearing organizations (DCOs) handle customer funds. Design/methodology/approach – The paper summarizes the most significant aspects of the CFTC's October 30, 2013 customer protection rulemaking, explains FCM and DCO obligations under the new regulatory regime, and sets forth a compliance timeline. Findings – The CFTC's recent overhaul of its customer protection rules impose significant new requirements on FCMs and DCOs in their handling of customer funds. Practical implications – All FCMs and DCOs that handle customer funds should review these new rules and begin putting into place policies and procedures to ensure their compliance as each new requirement comes into effect. Originality/value – The CFTC's overhaul of its customer protection regime is new and significant. FCMs and DCOs need to understand their new obligations under the rules. As these new rules are the CFTC's regulatory response to the events that led to the insolvencies of MF Global and Peregrine Financial Group, these developments also should be of interest to futures and swaps market participants generally.

scholarly journals The Rise of OTT Players: What is the Appropriate Regulatory Response?

2018 ◽  
pp. 241-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Steingröver ◽  
Edgar B. Cardozo Larrea ◽  
Nikolay Zhelev
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Response
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document