The Tradeoff between Tax Savings and Financial Reporting Costs: Public Versus Private Firms in China

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenny Lin ◽  
Fang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Private Firms ◽  
Tax Savings ◽  
Public Versus Private

Discretionary Accruals in Italian Private Firms and Non-Linear Bank Loan Granting

2017 ◽  
pp. 83-99
Author(s):  
Elisabetta Mafrolla ◽  
Viola Nobili
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Regulatory System ◽  
Discretionary Accruals ◽  
Bank Loans ◽  
Bank Loan ◽  
Banking Union ◽  
Private Firms ◽  
European Banking Union

This paper investigates whether and at what extent private firms reduce the quality of their accruals in order to signal a better portrait to the bank and obtain new or larger bank loans. We measure earnings discretionary accruals of a sample of Italian private firms, testing whether new and larger bank loans are associated with a higher (lower) quality of earnings in borrowers' financial reporting. We study bank loan levels and changes and how they impact discretionary accruals and found that, surprisingly, private firms' discretionary accruals are systematically positively affected by an increase in bank loans, although they are negatively affected by the credit worthiness rating assigned to the borrowers. We find that the monitoring role of the banking system with regard to the adoption of discretionary accruals is effective only when the loan is very large. This paper may have implications for policy-makers as it contributes to the understanding of the shortcomings of the banking regulatory system. This is an extremely relevant issue since the excessive amount of non-performing loans held by Italian banks recently threatened the stability of the European Banking Union as a whole.

Financial Reporting Choices of Large Private Firms

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer J. Gaver ◽  
Paul Mason ◽  
Steven Utke
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Private Firms

Financial Reporting Fraud: Public and Private Companies

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. A27-A41 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Scott Fleming ◽  
Dana R. Hermanson ◽  
Mary-Jo Kranacher ◽  
Richard A. Riley
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Private Companies ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Public Companies ◽  
Multivariate Tests ◽  
Public Company ◽  
Public Versus Private ◽  
Financial Reporting Fraud

ABSTRACT This study uses survey data gathered by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) and provided to the Institute for Fraud Prevention (IFP) to examine differences in the profile of financial reporting fraud (FRF) between private companies and public companies. Although private companies represent a significant portion of the economy, largely due to lack of data on these companies, most research on FRF examines only public companies. The primary objective of this study is to determine how private company FRF is different from FRF in public companies. Our multivariate tests reveal that public companies have stronger anti-fraud environments, are more likely to have frauds that involve timing differences, tend to experience larger frauds, have frauds that involve a larger number of perpetrators, and are less likely to have frauds that are discovered by accident. Overall, it appears that the stronger anti-fraud environment in public companies leads public company FRF perpetrators to use less obvious fraud methods (i.e., timing differences) and to involve larger fraud teams to circumvent the controls. These public company frauds are larger than in private companies, and their larger size may make them more likely to be detected through formal means, rather than by accident. Based on the results, we encourage auditors and others to be particularly attuned to the unique risks of the public versus private setting.

A literature survey of financial reporting in private firms

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Habib ◽  
D. Ranasinghe ◽  
H.J. Huang
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Literature Survey ◽  
Private Firms

Is risk reporting a possible link between financial and management accounting in private firms?

2021 ◽  
pp. 29-60
Author(s):  
Chiara Crovini ◽  
Giovanni Ossola
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Theory ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Management Accounting ◽  
Risk Attitude ◽  
Financial Accounting ◽  
Private Firms ◽  
Risk Disclosure ◽  
Direct Outcome ◽  
Risk Reporting

This study represents a theoretical analysis with the purpose to continue the discussion on the relationship between management accounting (MA) and financial accounting (FA), by concentrating on the role of risk reporting as a possible manifestation of their convergence. Moreover, the analysis focuses on the private-firm sector as private firms represent the backbone of the economic system of several countries and little is known about financial and non-financial reporting. Drawing on the neo- Durkheimian institutional theory, this paper develops a conceptual framing that considers risk as an embedded element of the business domain and risk reporting as a direct outcome of the convergence between MA and FA in private firms. Furthermore, the neo-Durkheimian institutional theory emphasizes that the owners and managers' risk attitude is a crucial element affecting risk disclosure, especially in private firms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document