Spatial Competition in Quality

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip U. Sauré ◽  
Raphael Auer
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 75-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Ottino-Loffler ◽  
Forrest Stonedahl ◽  
Vipin Veetil ◽  
Uri Wilensky

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 69-76
Author(s):  
E. A. Ostapenko

The article considers the problem of low total income and its effect on the economic development of the region under conditions of aggravation of spatial competition, describes the main features of the institutional trap that shape its factors.


2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff P. Boone ◽  
Inder K. Khurana ◽  
K. K. Raman

SUMMARY We examine whether Deloitte's spatial location in local audit markets affected the firm's adverse fallout—in terms of decreased ability to retain new clients and maintain audit fees—from the 2007 PCAOB censure. We motivate our inquiry by the notion that auditor-client alignment and auditor-closest-competitor distance can help differentiate the incumbent Big 4 auditor from other Big 4 auditors and thus provide market power, i.e., inhibit clients from shopping for another supplier because of the lack of a similar Big 4 provider in the local audit market. Consequently, it seems reasonable that the increase in switching risk and loss of fee growth suffered by Deloitte following the 2007 PCAOB censure will be lower in local markets where Deloitte was the market leader and its market share distance from its closest competitor was greater. Our findings suggest that the decline in Deloitte's audit fee growth rate following the 2007 PCAOB censure was concentrated in the pharmaceutical industry, although the client loss rate appears to have occurred more broadly (across all cities and industries). Collectively, our findings suggest that audit quality issues override auditor market power, i.e., differentiation does not provide Big 4 firms market power in the face of adverse regulatory action. JEL Classifications: G18; L51; M42; M49.


Agronomy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 176
Author(s):  
Huanxuan Chen ◽  
Xinxin Zhao ◽  
Yingchun Han ◽  
Fangfang Xing ◽  
Lu Feng ◽  
...  

Modification of the cotton canopy results in shade avoidance and competition for light, which shows that density and spatial arrangement of cotton have a great impact on light interception. This experiment was conducted in 2018 and 2019 in the experimental field at the Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science in Anyang city, Henan Province, China. Six plant densities of cotton variety SCRC28 were used to assess spatial competition for light in cotton populations during the whole growing period. Light interception data were collected and analyzed according to the spatial grid method and the extension of Simpson’s 3/8 rule. The results showed that at the bottom of the canopy, greater light interception was observed at high densities than at low densities, while in the external part of the layer of the canopy in the horizontal direction, low light interception was recorded at low densities. Leaf area, aboveground biomass and plant height were obviously correlated with light interception, and the cotton population with a higher density (8.7 plants m−2) performed best at the light interception competition, and with the highest yield. The results will provide guidance on light management through the optimization of the structure of the canopy to provide more solar radiation and a significant basis by which to improve the management of light and canopy architecture.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document