CDO and Structured Financial Products: A Modeling Perspective

ABSTRACT:Many ethicists argue that contract theory offers the most promising strategy for regulating risks. I challenge the adequacy of the contractualist approach for evaluating the complicated, novel risks associated with some structured financial products, particularly focusing on risks to third parties. Structured financial products like collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) divide a pool of financial assets into risk “tranches” organized from least to most risky. Investors purchase various tranches based on their individual risk-and-return preferences. Whereas contract theory holds that investment risks are ethically permitted (roughly) when everyone—including both parties directly involved in the investments and third parties—consents to them, structured financial products like CDOs show that even risks to which everyone consents are ethically problematic when they involve systemic risks of ruin.

Download Full-text

What is your desire? Retail investor preferences in structured products

Review of Behavioral Finance ◽

10.1108/rbf-10-2020-0254 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽

Author(s):

Rainer Baule ◽

Patrick Muenchhalfen

Keyword(s):

Design Methodology ◽

Recent Literature ◽

Product Structure ◽

Content Type ◽

Financial Products ◽

Retail Investors ◽

Retail Investor ◽

Retail Products ◽

Structured Financial Products ◽

Insight Into

PurposeThe authors evaluate the preferences of retail investors with regard to the investment in structured financial products. The purpose of the paper is an analysis of the relative importance of key product attributes namely the issuing bank, the product structure, the associated costs and the disclosed risk.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conduct a choice-based conjoint analysis, based on an online experiment. Participants judge their preferences for products which are presented by shortened key information documents according to the requirements of EU regulation.FindingsInvestors consider the costs and the product structure to be most important, whereas the issuer and information on risk are of less interest. Their preferences depend on their (self-evaluated) expertise: while inexperienced retail investors concentrate on costs, experienced investors pay more attention to the product structure.Research limitations/implicationsThe study is limited to a subsegment of the market, the discount certificates. For these products, issuing banks gain insight into the attractiveness of their products. Furthermore, the study carries implications for regulators: since investors emphasize the costs in their decisions, an unbiased disclosure of costs should be enforced.Originality/valueWhile the recent literature has studied preferences for the investment in mutual funds, this is the first paper which directly analyzes the drivers of an investment in structured retail products.

Download Full-text