Student Evaluation of Faculty: An Analysis of Survey Results

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Wong ◽  
Jason Fitzsimmons
Keyword(s):  
Student Evaluation ◽  
Survey Results ◽  
Student Evaluation Of Faculty

scholarly journals Response to Haskell's "Academic Freedom ... & Student Evaluation"

1997 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey E. Stake
Keyword(s):  
Academic Freedom ◽  
Classroom Behavior ◽  
Student Evaluation ◽  
Crucial Point ◽  
What Is Said ◽  
Administrative Practice ◽  
The Right ◽  
Student Evaluation Of Faculty

Haskell (1997) argued that the administrative practice of student evaluation of faculty is a threat to academic freedom. However, before that claim can be substantiated, several prior questions must be addressed: To whom does academic freedom belong? Individual faculty? The academy? Whose actions can violate the right? Can any lines be drawn based on whether the substance or form of classroom behavior is influenced? And still another crucial point is whether a body can violate academic freedom without any intent to interfere with or control the substance of what is said to students.

Technology and Teacher Education

2012 ◽  
pp. 102-111
Author(s):  
Albert Akyeampong ◽  
Teresa Franklin ◽  
Jared Keengwe
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Student Perceptions ◽  
Student Evaluation ◽  
Teacher Education Program ◽  
Instructional Quality ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Time On Task ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Faculty Interaction ◽  
Student Evaluation Of Faculty

This study explored one primary question: To what extent do student perceptions of various forms of instructional technology tools predict instructional quality? Participants for the study were drawn from a teacher education program in a large Midwest public university. Data were collected using a web-based survey with a total of 121 responses used in the final analysis. A multiple regression analysis was conducted to evaluate how well Productivity Tools, Presentation Tools, Communication Tools, and World Wide Web Tools predict Student Evaluation of Faculty Instructional Quality. The overall significant results of the regression model and the subsequent significant results of the t-test for Presentation Tools and Productivity Tools is an indication that Presentation and Productivity tools can be used by faculty to facilitate student and faculty interaction, promote cooperation among students, promote active learning techniques, give prompt feedback, emphasize time on task, communicate high expectation and respect diverse talents and ways of learning.

Comparison of Resident and Medical Student Evaluation of Faculty Teaching

2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brent C. Williams ◽  
Matthew S. Pillsbury ◽  
David T. Stern ◽  
Cyril M. Grum
Keyword(s):  
Medical Student ◽  
Student Evaluation ◽  
Faculty Teaching ◽  
Student Evaluation Of Faculty

scholarly journals Students Evaluation of Faculty

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Ahmad M. Thawabieh
Keyword(s):  
Student Evaluation ◽  
Faculty Evaluation ◽  
University Faculty ◽  
Technical University ◽  
Student Evaluation Of Faculty

This study aimed to investigate how students evaluate their faculty and the effect of gender, expected grade, and college on students’ evaluation. The study sample consisted of 5291 students from Tafila Technical University Faculty evaluation scale was used to collect data. The results indicated that student evaluation of faculty was high (mean = 4.14, S.D. = 0.79) and there were statistically significant differences in students’ evaluation attributed to students’ gender, college and expected grade in the course.

scholarly journals Medical Student Evaluation of Faculty in Student–Preceptor Pairs

2007 ◽  
Vol 82 (Suppl) ◽  
pp. S30-S33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita M. Willett ◽  
Sonya R. Lawson ◽  
Judy S. Gary ◽  
Indra A. Kancitis
Keyword(s):  
Medical Student ◽  
Student Evaluation ◽  
Student Evaluation Of Faculty
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document