A Comparative Analysis of Global City Policies in Climate Change Mitigation: London, New York, Milan, Mexico City and Bangkok

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edoardo Croci ◽  
Sabrina Melandri ◽  
Tania Molteni
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
New York ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Mexico City ◽  
Climate Change Mitigation ◽  
Global City ◽  
Change Mitigation

The Means Behind the Methods

2019 ◽  
pp. 116-147
Author(s):  
Sara Hughes
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
New York ◽  
New York City ◽  
Los Angeles ◽  
York City ◽  
Climate Change Mitigation ◽  
Ghg Emissions ◽  
Coalition Building ◽  
Ballot Initiatives ◽  
Change Mitigation

This chapter assesses how New York City, Los Angeles, and Toronto have used the three governing strategies—institution building, coalition building, and capacity building—to support their efforts to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Each strategy reduces key sources of uncertainty that arise when taking up the new and challenging issue of climate change mitigation. The governing strategies facilitate action on climate change and channel resources to the effort. In this way, the strategies underpin and support governance for climate change mitigation regardless of the particular mode of governing or source of emissions being targeted. These strategies have manifested in different ways: while New York City and Toronto have focused on building stakeholder coalitions invested in and informing city government programs, Los Angeles has focused more on mobilizing voters willing to support ballot initiatives.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document