Paying for Risk or Shareholder Rip-Off? An Analysis of Ex-Ante Severance Pay Contracts

Author(s):  
Raghavendra Rau ◽  
Jin Xu
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
pp. 0148558X2092098
Author(s):  
Herita Akamah ◽  
Bryan Brockbank ◽  
Sydney Qing Shu

Extant literature documents a positive association between ex ante severance pay and timeliness of bad news disclosure, suggesting that the provision of severance pay is consistent with efficient contracting. Relying on an empirically unexplored theory, we investigate whether and how managerial exit costs (i.e., financial and nonfinancial losses triggered by employment termination) affect the effectiveness of severance pay in curbing bad news withholding. We find that managerial exit costs attenuate the positive association between severance pay and timely disclosure of bad news. Moreover, we document that severance pay does not prompt managers to reveal bad news when their exit costs are sufficiently high (i.e., in the top quartile). This result suggests that exit costs erode the efficacy of ex ante severance pay in curtailing bad news withholding. Overall, our findings support the notion that a “one-size-fits-all” approach to structuring severance agreements undermines the potential of severance pay to benefit investors.


2017 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P. Baginski ◽  
John L. Campbell ◽  
Lisa A. Hinson ◽  
David S. Koo

ABSTRACT Theory argues that career concerns (i.e., concerns about the impact of current performance on contemporaneous and future compensation) encourage managers to withhold bad news disclosure. However, empirical evidence regarding the extent to which a manager's career concerns are associated with a delay in bad news disclosure is limited. Across multiple proxies for career concerns, we find that the extent to which managers delay bad news is positively associated with their level of career concerns. Then, we hand-collect data on a compensation contract that firms use to reduce CEOs' career concerns (i.e., ex ante severance pay agreements). We find that if managers receive a sufficiently large payment in the event of dismissal, they no longer delay the disclosure of bad news. Overall, our findings support prior theoretical evidence that managers delay bad news disclosure due to career concerns and suggest a mechanism through which firms can mitigate the delay. JEL Classifications: M12; M41. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text.


2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 737-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian D. Cadman ◽  
John L. Campbell ◽  
Sandy Klasa

AbstractEfficient contracting predicts that ex ante severance pay contracts are offered to chief executive officers (CEOs) as protection against downside risk and to encourage investment in risky projects with a positive net present value (NPV). Consistent with this prediction, we find that ex ante contracted severance pay is positively associated with proxies for a CEO’s risk of dismissal and costs the CEO would incur from dismissal. Additionally, we show that the contracted severance payment amount is positively associated with CEO risk taking and the extent to which a CEO invests in projects that have a positive NPV. Overall, our findings imply that ex ante severance pay contracts are consistent with efficient contracting.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Simon ◽  
Keith J. Holyoak

Abstract Cushman characterizes rationalization as the inverse of rational reasoning, but this distinction is psychologically questionable. Coherence-based reasoning highlights a subtler form of bidirectionality: By distorting task attributes to make one course of action appear superior to its rivals, a patina of rationality is bestowed on the choice. This mechanism drives choice and action, rather than just following in their wake.


2018 ◽  
pp. 34-39
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Kluza
Keyword(s):  

W trakcie procesu budżetowego występuje szereg nieefektywności, tym silniejszych, im większe jest dane przedsiębiorstwo. Jednym z powszechnych zjawisk jest ukrywanie przez pracowników informacji o faktycznych możliwościach rozwoju biznesu, aby negocjować jak najniższe poziomy celów do swych systemów motywacyjnych. Wpływa to bezpośrednio na spadek tempa rozwoju danej instytucji lub wzrost jej kosztów działania. W niniejszym opracowaniu przedstawiony jest model systemu motywacyjnego, który zapobiega przyjmowaniu zaniżonych celów do budżetów. Jego istotą jest wprowadzenie do mechanizmu premiowania parametru ambitności, określanego ex ante na etapie zatwierdzania celów. Odpowiednie ukształtowanie parametrów macierzy współczynnika ambitności, realizacji planu oraz stawek wynagrodzenia zmiennego sprawia, iż najlepszą strategią dla pracownika jest zgłaszanie do budżetu celów zgodnych z jego faktycznymi możliwościami realizacji.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document