Pi Sigma Alpha: The Honor Society's Role in Student Education and Professional Development

What happened and why? A programme theory-based qualitative evaluation of a healthcare-academia partnership reform in primary care

BMC Health Services Research ◽

10.1186/s12913-019-4665-1 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Håkan Uvhagen ◽

Henna Hasson ◽

Johan Hansson ◽

Mia von Knorring

Keyword(s):

Professional Development ◽

Primary Care ◽

Empirical Studies ◽

Qualitative Evaluation ◽

Care Practice ◽

Programme Theory ◽

Research Student ◽

Student Education ◽

Primary Care Practitioners ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background There is increasing interest in and demands for partnerships between academia and healthcare practices. Few empirical studies have described the influence of such partnerships from a practice perspective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a reform launched to increase integration between primary care and academia and to identify potential reasons for why the observed impact occurred in three areas targeted by the reform: research, student education, and continued professional development. Methods The study was conducted in Stockholm County, the largest healthcare region in Sweden, at the introduction of a partnership between primary care and academia, including eight coordinating centres and approximately 500 surrounding primary care units. A programme theory-based qualitative approach to evaluation was used, building on document analysis, and in-depth interviews with the centre managers (n = 6) and coordinators (n = 8) conducted 42–66 months after the initiation of the reform. Results The analysis showed that the reform had some impact on all three areas targeted by the reform: research, student education, and continued professional development. The input that contributed most extensively to the impact was the establishment of facilitating roles. Most changes occurred at the coordinating centres and primarily in the area of student education. The effect on student education was primarily due to having prior experience in this area and perceptions of timely benefits of students to care practice. Conclusions Partnerships between primary care and academia hold the potential of practice impact. To increase integration between primary care and academia, the components of the integration must be understandable and relevant for primary care practitioners, and importantly, compliant with delivery of primary care.

Download Full-text