Minorities and Healthcare Disparities: Access, Diagnosis, Treatment and Mortality

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elgie McFayden
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Disparities

White Paper: SSAT Commitment to Workforce Diversity and Healthcare Disparities

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 879-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Matthew Walsh ◽  
D. Rohan Jeyarajah ◽  
Jeffrey B. Matthews ◽  
Dana Telem ◽  
Mary T. Hawn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Disparities ◽  
White Paper ◽  
Workforce Diversity

scholarly journals Demographics associated with US healthcare disparities are exacerbated by the telemedicine surge during the COVID-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
pp. 1357633X2110259
Author(s):  
Kristin N Gmunder ◽  
Jose W Ruiz ◽  
Dido Franceschi ◽  
Maritza M Suarez
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Healthcare Disparities ◽  
Descriptive Statistics ◽  
Internal Revenue Service ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Postal Code ◽  
The Us ◽  
Hispanic Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Racial Ethnic

Introduction As coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hit the US, there was widespread and urgent implementation of telemedicine programs nationwide without much focus on the impact on patient populations with known existing healthcare disparities. To better understand which populations cannot access telemedicine during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, this study aims to demographically describe and identify the most important demographic predictors of telemedicine visit completion in an urban health system. Methods Patient de-identified demographics and telemedicine visit data ( N = 362,764) between March 1, 2020 and October 31, 2020 were combined with Internal Revenue Service 2018 individual income tax data by postal code. Descriptive statistics and mixed effects logistic regression were used to determine impactful patient predictors of telemedicine completion, while adjusting for clustering at the clinical site level. Results Many patient-specific demographics were found to be significant. Descriptive statistics showed older patients had lower rates of completion ( p < 0.001). Also, Hispanic patients had statistically significant lower rates ( p < 0.001). Overall, minorities (racial, ethnic, and language) had decreased odds ratios of successful telemedicine completion compared to the reference. Discussion While telemedicine use continues to be critical during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, entire populations struggle with access—possibly widening existing disparities. These results contribute large datasets with significant findings to the limited research on telemedicine access and can help guide us in improving telemedicine disparities across our health systems and on a wider scale.

Eliminating Healthcare Disparities in America: Beyond the IOM Report

JAMA ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 298 (24) ◽  
pp. 2914
Author(s):  
Darrell J. Gaskin
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Disparities

LGBT healthcare disparities: What progress have we made?

2017 ◽  
Vol 100 (12) ◽  
pp. 2357-2361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen A. Bonvicini
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Disparities

Factors Associated With, and Mitigation Strategies for, Healthcare Disparities Faced by Patients With Headache Disorders

Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012261
Author(s):  
Jessica Kiarashi ◽  
Juliana VanderPluym ◽  
Christina L. Szperka ◽  
Scott Turner ◽  
Mia T. Minen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Cultural Sensitivity ◽  
Healthcare Disparities ◽  
Community Outreach ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Mitigation Strategies ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Headache Disorders ◽  
Pubmed Search ◽  
Underserved Groups

ObjectiveTo review the contemporary issues of healthcare disparities in Headache Medicine with regard to race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and geography and propose solutions for addressing these disparities.MethodsAn internet and PubMed search was performed and literature was reviewed for key concepts underpinning disparities in Headache Medicine. Content was refined to areas most salient to our goal of informing the provision of equitable care in headache treatment through discussions with this group of 16 experts from a range of headache subspecialties.ResultsTaken together, a multitude of factors including racism, socioeconomic status and insurance status and geographical disparities contribute to the inequities that exist within the healthcare system when treating headache disorders. Interventions such as improving public education, advocacy, optimizing telemedicine, engaging in community outreach to educate primary care providers, training providers in cultural sensitivity and competence and implicit bias, addressing health literacy and developing recruitment strategies to increase representation of underserved groups within headache research are proposed as solutions to ameliorate disparities.ConclusionNeurologists have a responsibility to provide and deliver equitable care to all. It is important that disparities in the management of headache disorders are identified and addressed.

Abstract 1122‐000121: Integrated Geomapping Tool of Certified Stroke Centers in United States: A SVIN MT2020+ Committee Collaboration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Kolesnick ◽  
Evan Kolesnick ◽  
Alfredo Munoz ◽  
Kaiz Asif ◽  
Santiago Ortega‐Gutierrez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Healthcare Disparities ◽  
Systems Of Care ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Stroke Systems Of Care ◽  
Stroke Center

Introduction : Stroke is a leading cause of morbidity, mortality and healthcare spending in the United States. Acute management of ischemic stroke is time‐dependent and evidence suggests improved clinical outcomes for patients treated at designated certified stroke centers. There is an increasing trend among hospitals to obtain certification as designated stroke centers. A common source or integrated tool providing both information and location of all available stroke centers in the US irrespective of the certifying organization is not readily available. The objective of our research is to generate a comprehensive and interactive electronic resource with combined data on all geographically‐coded certified stroke centers to assist in pre‐hospital triage and study healthcare disparities in stroke including availability and access to acute stroke care by location and population. Methods : Data on stroke center certification was primarily obtained from each of the three main certifying organizations: The Joint Commission (TJC), Det Norske Veritas (DNV) and Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program (HFAP). Geographic mapping of all stroke center locations was performed using the ArcGIS Pro application. The most current data on stroke centers is presented in an interactive electronic format and the information is frequently updated to represent newly certified centers. Utility of the tool and its analytics are shown. Role of the tool in improving pre‐hospital triage in the stroke systems of care, studying healthcare disparities and implications for public health policy are discussed. Results : Aggregate data analysis at the time of submission revealed 1,806 total certified stroke centers. TJC‐certified stroke centers represent the majority with 106 Acute Stroke Ready (ASR), 1,040 Primary Stroke Centers (PSCs), 49 Thrombectomy Capable Centers (TSCs) and 197 Comprehensive Stroke Centers (CSCs). A total of 341 DNV‐certified programs including 36 ASRs, 162 PSCs, 16 PSC Plus (thrombectomy capable) and 127 CSCs were identified. HFAP‐certified centers (75) include 16 ASRs, 49 PSCs, 2 TSCs and 8 CSCs. A preliminary map of all TJC‐certified CSCs and TSCs is shown in the figure (1). Geospatial analysis reveals distinct areas with currently limited access to certified stroke centers and currently, access to certified stroke centers is extremely limited to non‐existent in fe States (for example: Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, New Mexico and South Dakota). Conclusions : Stroke treatment and clinical outcomes are time‐dependent and prompt assessment and triage by EMS directly to appropriate designated stroke centers is therefore critical. A readily available electronic platform providing location and treatment capability for all nearby certified centers will enhance regional stroke systems of care, including enabling more rapid inter‐hospital transfers for advanced intervention. Identifying geographic areas of limited access to treatment can also help improve policy and prioritize the creation of a more equitable and well‐distributed network of stroke care in the United States.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document