Dynamic International Portfolio Adjustment: Rational Investors and the Home Bias

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Vermeulen
2004 ◽  
Vol 04 (34) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shujing Li ◽  
Hamid Faruqee ◽  
Isabel K. Yan ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Pavlo Dziuba ◽  
Kyryl Shtogrin

The place of home bias in the modern paradigm of international portfolio investing is determined. The differences between theory and practice of international portfolio investing resulting from such a bias are identified. Main advantages of international diversification of investment portfolios in terms of performance-risk ratio are defined. It is determined that the growing level of financial markets globalization accompanied by the increase in correlation of returns of financial assets have not affected the benefits of international diversification. The primary problems in determining the reasons for home bias are identified. The main economic and mathematical formalization of home bias in the form of indexes is distinguished. The local bias is investigated. It is revealed that local bias is not limited to national borders. It is determined that home bias is negatively correlated with the wealth of an investor. The extent of home bias for particular groups of countries according to their level of economic development is investigated. It is determined that the highest level of home bias is observed in several developed markets, including China, Japan, the USA, and France, while Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and Switzerland have the highest level of international diversification. The benefits of international diversification based on the MSCI indexes are determined. It is revealed that the benefits from international diversification through emerging markets are higher than those of developed markets. A comparative analysis of portfolios of several countries in the instruments of foreign and local markets is carried out. It is determined that the Great Recession of 2007-2008 promoted the increase in the level of home bias but since 2013 the global level of international diversification has been increasing. Approaches to the analysis of factors of presence of home bias are determined and their main advantages and disadvantages are analyzed based on comparative analysis. The impact of asymmetry of information, financial reporting standards, non-tradable sector of the economy, volumes of investment, inflation, transaction costs, institutional factors on the level of international diversification of the investment portfolio is investigated. A new approach to systematization of factors of home bias through their clustering for institutional, behavioral, transaction and other factors is suggested.


2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (3/4) ◽  
pp. 131-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry R. Gorman ◽  
◽  
Bjorn N. Jorgensen ◽  

2004 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Li

AbstractOne striking feature of international portfolio investment is the extent to which equity portfolios are concentrated in the domestic equity market of the investor—the home bias puzzle. I examine the role of investors' perception of foreign investment risk on their portfolio choices. The expected returns and risk of foreign investment are specified through an asset pricing model with the home portfolio being the benchmark asset—Pastor's (2000) domestic CAPM. The model serves as a reference point around which investors can center their prior beliefs. I focus on investors' prior beliefs that are consistent with the literature on confidence in the familiar—foreign equities, in terms of both expected returns and risk, being viewed less favorably than domestic equities. These prior beliefs are then combined with the data on G7 equities, and the revised beliefs are used to obtain the global optimal asset allocation. To hold predominantly domestic equities, each G7 investor has to believe that the risk of foreign investment is several times higher than the actual risk. The home bias is more of a puzzle for a U.S. investor during the 1970s. Specifying investors' prior beliefs around the world CAPM does not help resolve the puzzle.


2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierpaolo Benigno ◽  
Salvatore Nisticò

This paper revisits an old argument, hedging real exchange rate risk, as an explanation of the international home bias in equity. In a dynamic model, the relevant risk to be hedged is the long-run risk as opposed to the short-run risk. Domestic equity is indeed a good hedge with respect to long-run real-exchange-rate risk. Two new frameworks are able to explain a large share of the observed US home bias: a model with Hansen-Sargent preferences in which agents fear model misspecification and a model with Epstein-Zin preferences. These two models are also immune to the risk-free rate puzzle. (JEL C58, F31, G11, G15)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document