The Long-Term Operating Performance of Reverse Leveraged Buyouts in Germany

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Man Sze Kelly Yip
Keyword(s):  
Operating Performance ◽  
Leveraged Buyouts ◽  
Reverse Leveraged Buyouts

scholarly journals Institutional Investors and Hedge Fund Activism

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simi Kedia ◽  
Laura Starks ◽  
Xianjue Wang
Keyword(s):  
Stock Returns ◽  
Institutional Investors ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Hedge Fund ◽  
Target Firms ◽  
Hedge Fund Activism ◽  
Institutional Shareholders

Abstract Hedge fund activists have ambiguous relationships with the institutional shareholders in their target firms. While some support their activities, others counter their actions. Due to their relatively small holdings in target firms, activists typically need the cooperation of other institutional shareholders that are willing to influence the activists’ campaign success. We find the presence of “activism-friendly” institutions as owners is associated with an increased probability of being a target, higher long-term stock returns, and higher operating performance. Overall, we provide evidence suggesting the composition of a firm’s ownership has significant effects on hedge fund activists’ decisions and outcomes.

The Performance of Reverse Leveraged Buyouts: Another Look

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-358
Author(s):  
Trevor W. Chamberlain ◽  
Francois Xavier Joncheray
Keyword(s):  
Leveraged Buyouts ◽  
Reverse Leveraged Buyouts

Governance and long-term operating performance of family and non-family firms in Australia

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 398-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enver Halili ◽  
Ali Salman Saleh ◽  
Rami Zeitun
Keyword(s):  
Agency Costs ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Family Ownership ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Impact

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis of the long-term operating performance of family and non-family firms from the agency theoretic perspective. The analysis is focused on investigating the impact of family ownership on principal–agent conflicts of interest. Design/methodology/approach – This paper examines the relationship between firm operating performance and family ownership for a large sample of 677 Australian-listed companies. The paper uses the Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) estimator model developed by Arellano and Bond (1991) and used by other studies in finance (Baltagi, 2012; Bond, 2002; Mohamed et al., 2008). Findings – The empirical results show that firms with ownership concentration has a better operating performance due to the alignment of owner-management interests. This study also finds that family-listed companies have higher survival rates and perform better than non-family companies. Findings support the hypothesis that agency costs arise as a result of privileged access of information and self-interest behaviour of managers (outsiders) in firms with dispersed ownership structures. Originality/value – Earlier studies have only focused on short-term perspectives, particularly investigating small and medium types of Australian family businesses from narrow aspects, such as productivity, business behaviour, capital structure and leverage. Therefore, this paper has conducted a comparative examination of family and non-family firms listed on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) to identify the impact of agency costs on their financial performance.

scholarly journals The impact of equitization on financial and operating performance of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in Vietnam: An approach using propensity score matching

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. First
Author(s):  
Nguyen Van Tan
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Comparison Method ◽  
Average Treatment Effect ◽  
Operating Efficiency ◽  
Investment Strategies ◽  
Industry Group ◽  
Using Data ◽  
The Impact

This paper examines the impact of equitization on financial and operating performance of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in Vietnam. Previous related privatization theories have not explained whether there is an improvement in financial and operating performance of equitized SOEs compared to non-equitized SOEs or not. This study proposes to use with-without comparison method through the average treatment effect measuring the impact of equitization on financial and operating performance of SOEs. By using data of 114 SOEs equitized in the period from 2012 to 2014, the author finds that equitized SOEs can not improve profitability, operating efficiency, and output when considering non-equitized SOEs. There is also no evidence for a reduction in the number of employees of equitized SOEs after equitization. These findings are in contrast to previous studies in Vietnam, but there are similarities with the results of studies in China. This is because equitized SOEs in the early post-equitization period in Vietnam are still monitored by the Vietnamese government, as well as the equitized enterprises in the period 2012-2014 are mainly large-scale ones with slow change of operating objectives, monitoring mechanism and weak competitiveness after equitization. However, equitization can help equitized SOEs operate more efficiently than non–equitized SOEs when considering non-listing status or industry group. This research provides implications for the Vietnamese government to encourage non-equitized enterprises to participate in the equitization program actively. The research results also help investors to have appropriate long-term investment strategies in equitized SOEs. This paper also has some limitations for further research.

Do frequent acquirers outperform in cross-border acquisitions? A study of Indian companies

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 491-514
Author(s):  
Samta Jain ◽  
Smita Kashiramka ◽  
P.K. Jain
Keyword(s):  
Operating Performance ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Acquisition Performance ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Acquisition Period ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Acquiring Firms ◽  
The Impact ◽  
First Time

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of cross-border acquisitions (CBAs) on the financial and operating performance of acquiring firms from emerging economies in the long-term; the acquiring firms have been segregated into frequent (multiple) and first-time (single) acquirers based on their prior cross-border experience. The intent is to identify if overseas activities bring over and above advantage to multiple acquirers in terms of enhanced financial synergies and reduced costs, motivating them to engage in sequential international transactions. Design/methodology/approach The paper analyses the impact of CBAs announced and completed during 2004–2013 by Indian companies listed on the NIFTY 500 index. The post-acquisition financial and operating performance of Indian cross-border acquirers has been compared with their pre-acquisition performance. The average performance over three-years immediately preceding the acquisition year constitutes the benchmark for the post-acquisition performance. The post-acquisition period includes a year of integration followed by three successive post-integration years. Therefore, in operational terms, the research period extends from 2001–2017. The long-term performance of frequent (multiple) and first-time (single) Indian acquirers has been investigated comprehensively using a set of 16 financial ratios. The performance has been assessed using the secondary data collected from financial statements of acquiring companies; the financial statements and the list of CBAs by Indian companies have been obtained from Thomson Reuter’s EIKON database. Findings The financial and operating performance of frequent as well as first-time acquirers have depicted a similarly deteriorating trend during the post-acquisition period. These findings indicate that the international expansion of Indian companies is not guided by synergy creation potential and may be pushed by the overconfidence or over-optimism and agency conflicts of managers. This, perhaps, indicates that firms are being imprudent in investing free cash flows available with them. Originality/value The study is the first of its kind. No study, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, has analysed the performance of acquiring firms by segregating them into frequent and first-time acquirers using accounting measures of performance. More so, an extensive analysis of the long-term financial and operating performance of acquiring companies is rare to come across in the extant literature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document