A Comparison of Penny Stock Initial Public Offerings and Reverse Mergers as Alternative Mechanisms to Going Public

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis V. Floros ◽  
Kuldeep Shastri
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Going Public ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Reverse Mergers

scholarly journals Introduction

2018 ◽  
pp. xiv-24
Author(s):  
Douglas Cumming ◽  
Sofia Johan
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Investment Banks ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Reverse Mergers ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Long Term Performance ◽  
Term Performance ◽  
Special Purpose Acquisition Companies

The worldwide landscape for raising firm capital from Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) has significantly evolved over the last few decades. This introductory chapter reviews more recent research on initial public offerings. The Oxford Handbook of IPOs comprises twenty-nine chapters from authors around the world. The chapters describe the economics of going public, short- and long-term performance of IPOs, regulation of IPOs, IPOs versus acquisitions, reverse mergers, special purpose acquisition companies, service providers including investment banks and auditors, venture capital funds, international differences in IPOs, and crowdfunding. The Introduction summarizes the chapters that appear in the Handbook and highlight research trends on topic.

scholarly journals Role Of Underwriters In Restraining Earnings Management In Initial Public Offerings

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hei Wai Lee ◽  
Yan Alice Xie ◽  
Jian Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Venture Capitalists ◽  
Font Size ◽  
Going Public ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Investment Bankers ◽  
Sarbanes Oxley

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p style="margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; text-align: justify; mso-pagination: none;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">We investigate the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;">relationship</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> between underwriter</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;"> reputation</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> and earnings management of IPO firms over the period of 1991-2005. We find that </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;">IPO firms engage in less earnings management</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> if </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;">they</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> are underwritten by prestigious investment bankers. Furthermore, the role of prestigious underwriters in restraining earnings management of IPO issuers do not change during the Internet Bubble period or after the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). The findings support the certification role of underwriters in the IPO process.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>We also document that</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;"> firms going public in the post-SOX period engage in less earnings management compared to firms going public in the pre-SOX period</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">. Further findings suggest that the changing objectives of venture capitalists may explain the reduction in the level of earnings management of IPO firms following the passage of SOX.</span></span></p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span>

scholarly journals An Empirical Analysis for Abnormal Returns from Initial Public Offerings (IPOs): evidence of Iranian oil and chemical industries

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdi Filsaraei ◽  
Alireza Azarberahman ◽  
Jalal Azarberahman
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Capital Market ◽  
Abnormal Return ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Abnormal Returns ◽  
Going Public ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Positive Abnormal Return ◽  
Chemical Companies

Purpose: The core purpose of this paper empirically study of the initial public offerings (IPOs) of companies accepted in oil and chemical industries. The paper attempts to answer the question of is there any abnormal return from IPOs in listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE).Design/methodology/approach: This research is an applied research, and its design is empirical, which is done by the method of post-event (past information). For the purpose of the study the t-statistic, regression and variance analyses are applied to examine the hypotheses. We use in the analyses a sample of 29 newly accepted Iranian oil and chemical companies listed on TSE for the period of 2001 to 2012. This paper has studied abnormal return and three abnormal phenomena have been considered in capital market. These phenomena consist: (1) underpricing or overpricing of the firm's stock, (2) lower or higher stock return of the firms and (3) Particular period in market for stock transactions volume.Findings: The results support the hypothesis that there is a positive abnormal return to investing in the newly accepted oil and chemical firms for stockholders. It also shown the firm size is the only factor that can affect the stock abnormal return. With considering significance level, investors have to give attention sequentially to other variables such as stock ownership centralization, going public time and stock offering volume.

scholarly journals The Berlin Stock Exchange in Imperial Germany: A Market for New Technology?

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 3558-3576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sibylle Lehmann-Hasemeyer ◽  
Jochen Streb
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Industrial Revolution ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Going Public ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Imperial Germany ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Innovative Firms ◽  
Surprising Fact

Analyzing 474 cases of firms going public in the German capital between 1892 and 1913, we show that innovative firms could rely on the Berlin stock market as a source of financing. Our data also reveal that initial public offerings (IPO) of innovative firms were characterized by particularly low underpricing, comparatively high first trading prices, and no long-run underperformance. We interpret these empirical results as evidence for the surprising fact that in the period of the Second Industrial Revolution the Berlin stock exchange was already a well-functioning market for new technology. (JEL G14, N23)

scholarly journals Signalling, Insider Trading, And Post-Offering Performance: The Case Of Initial Public Offerings

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas H. Eyssell ◽  
Donald R. Kummer
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Insider Trading ◽  
Going Public ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Corporate Insiders ◽  
Ipo Pricing ◽  
Public Offering

Previous IPO studies have concluded that, on average, (1) the shares of firms going public are underpriced at the time of the offering, (2) prices adjust rapidly in the aftermarket, and (3) IPOs are generally poor performers over the longer-term. This study reevaluates the IPO pricing phenomenon utilizing more recent data and empirically tests the signaling models of Leland and Pyle (1977) and Gale and Stiglitz (1989), which imply that both first-day and aftermarket returns may be related to insiders transactions. Our results suggest that initial returns are inversely related to the proportion of the offering representing insiders share and that corporate insiders are, on average, net sellers in the year subsequent to the initial public offering. We also find that the greatest volume of post-offering insider sales occurs in those firms in which insiders are sold shares at the offering.

scholarly journals Factors Influencing IPO Decisions. Do Corporate Managers Use Market and Corporate Timing? A Survey

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Szyszka
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Going Public ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Corporate Managers ◽  
Market Mispricing ◽  
Corporate Decisions ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Warsaw Stock Exchange ◽  
Do So

Abstract This paper explores the motives for Initial Public Offerings (IPOs); that is, whether market mispricing or the behavioral inclinations of investors and analysts impact corporate decisions about rising equity, with a particular focus on market and corporate timing practices of managers going public. To do so, an anonymous survey was conducted of 166 managers of firms that recently went public at the Warsaw Stock Exchange in Poland (being the second most active IPO market in Europe, after London). The resulting data reveals that managers attempt to time bullish markets and good historical corporate financial results.

What a Difference a Month Makes: Stock Analyst Valuations Following Initial Public Offerings

2006 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Houston ◽  
Christopher James ◽  
Jason Karceski
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Alternative Explanation ◽  
Going Public ◽  
Public Offerings

AbstractWe examine how analysts establish target prices for IPO firms and whether comparable firms used to support target prices are helpful in explaining IPO offer prices. During the bubble period of 1999 to 2000, the average offer price was set at a discount relative to comparable firm valuations. In contrast, the average offer price was set at a small premium relative to comparables in the pre-bubble period. This shift appears to hold even after controlling for the differences in the types of firms going public during the bubble period. Moreover, target prices of IPO firms were set at a higher premium relative to comparables during the bubble period. While our results suggest that underwriters systematically discounted offer prices during the bubble period, an alternative explanation is that the shift arose because underwriters and analysts faced different incentives and legal exposures during the bubble period.

scholarly journals Do Private Firms Outperform SOE Firms after Going Public in China Given their Different Governance Characteristics?

2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shenghui Tong ◽  
Eddy Junarsin
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Early Years ◽  
Private Firms ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Business Practices ◽  
Business Climate ◽  
Going Public ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
The Government

This study examines the characteristics of board structure that affect Chinese public firm’s financial performance. Using a sample of 871 firms with 699 observations of previously private firms and 1,914 observations of previously state-owned enterprise (SOE) firms, we investigate the differences in corporate governance between publicly listed firms that used to be pure private firms before going public and listed firms that used to be SOEs before their initial public offerings (IPOs). Our main finding is that previously private firms outperform previously SOE firms in China after IPOs. In the wake of becoming listed firms, previously SOE firms might be faced with difficulties adjusting to professional business practices to build and extend competitive advantages. In addition, favorable policies and assistance from the government to the SOE firms might have triggered complacency, especially in early years after getting listed. On the other hand, professional savvy and acumen, combined with efficiency and favorable business climate created by the government have probably led the previously private firms to improve their values stronger and faster.          

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document