Social Return on Investment, Value Added and Volunteer Work

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Segio Ulrich Pace ◽  
Leonardo Cruz Basso
Keyword(s):  
Return On Investment ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Volunteer Work ◽  
Social Return On Investment ◽  
Investment Value

Implementasi Analisis Social Return On Investment

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohmadina Sabila Fitri
Keyword(s):  
Return On Investment ◽  
Social Return On Investment

Artikel ini berisi implentasi Social Return On Investment terutama bagi warga Surabaya sekitar. Social Return On Investment sendiri adalah metode berbasis prinsip untuk mengukur kelebihan dari nilai keuangan relatif terhadap sumber daya yang diinvestasikan.

Social Return on Investment: Health Promotion Programs

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Worawan Chandoevwit ◽  
Kannika Thampanishvong ◽  
Rattanakarun Rojjananukulpong
Keyword(s):  
Health Promotion ◽  
Return On Investment ◽  
Social Return On Investment ◽  
Health Promotion Programs

scholarly journals Adding value to the use of Health Impact Assessment and social return on investment technologies

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Green ◽  
K Ashton ◽  
M Dyakova ◽  
L Parry-Williams
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Return On Investment ◽  
Health Impact Assessment ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Social Return On Investment ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Health Impact Assessment (HIA) and Social Return on Investment (SROI) are beneficial public health methodologies that assess potential effects on health including social, economic and environmental factors and have synergies in their approaches. This paper explores how HIA and SROI can complement each other to capture and account for the impact and social value of an assessed intervention or policy. A scoping review of academic and grey literature was undertaken to identify case studies published between January 1996 and April 2019 where HIA and SROI methods have been used to complement each other. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with nine international experts from a range of regulatory/legislative contexts to gain a better understanding of past experiences and expertise of both HIA and SROI. A thematic analysis was undertaken on the data collected. The review identified two published reports which outline when HIA and SROI have both been used to assess the same intervention. Interview results suggest that both methods have strengths as standalone processes i.e. HIAs are well-structured in their approach, assessing health in its broadest context and SROI can add value by monetizing social value as well as capturing social/environmental impact. Similarities of the two methods were identified i.e. a strong emphasis on stakeholder engagement and common shared principles. When questioned how the two methods could complement each other in practice, the results indicate the benefits of using HIA to explore initial impact, and as a platform on which to build SROI to monetarize social value. HIA and SROI methodologies have cross-over. The research suggests potential benefits when used in tandem or combining the methods to assess impact and account for health and social value. Innovative work is now being carried out in Wales to understand the implications of this in practice and to understand how the results of the two methods could be used by decision-makers. Key messages HIA and SROI methods can be used in tandem to capture both the health impact and social value of policies and proposed interventions. HIA and SROI when used together can provide valuable information to inform decision makers around the health impact and social value of proposed policies and interventions.

scholarly journals Capturing the social value of buildings: The promise of Social Return on Investment (SROI)

2016 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. 289-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly J. Watson ◽  
James Evans ◽  
Andrew Karvonen ◽  
Tim Whitley
Keyword(s):  
Return On Investment ◽  
Social Value ◽  
Social Return On Investment ◽  
The Social

A Social-Return-On-Investment Analysis Of Bon Secours Hospital’s ‘Housing For Health’ Affordable Housing Program

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 513-520
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Fulgence Drabo ◽  
Grace Eckel ◽  
Samuel L. Ross ◽  
Michael Brozic ◽  
Chanie G. Carlton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Affordable Housing ◽  
Return On Investment ◽  
Investment Analysis ◽  
Housing Program ◽  
Social Return On Investment

scholarly journals OTC market during COVID-19 pandemic and impact on its further development

2021 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 01019
Author(s):  
Veronika Machová ◽  
Jiří Kučera ◽  
Michaela Juhaňáková
Keyword(s):  
Neural Networks ◽  
Exchange Rate ◽  
Normal Level ◽  
Return On Investment ◽  
Value Added ◽  
The Past ◽  
Index Value ◽  
Further Development ◽  
Volume Of Trade

Research background: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic strongly affected the development of the volume of trade on the OTC market. The volume was below its normal level due to the uncertainty and fear in the society. Purpose of the article: The objective of the paper was to explain the differences between the period before the pandemic, during the pandemic, and to determine the predictions of further development until the year 2025 Methods: Using the method of neural networks, the prediction of the closing exchange rate until 2025 was determined based on the data from the past years, according to which the RM index value will be higher in December this year, with a subsequent slight decrease and fluctuations. Findings & Value added: The results showed that the volume of trades was lower in the past compared to the period just before the pandemic, i.e. the year 2020, when the RM index was clearly highest. Investors should postpone investments until the value of the RM index is stable and trading on the OTC market is advantageous again. However, if they are willing to risk, investments can be made, although the return on investment will be unreasonably long.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document