Tax Avoidance, Cost of Debt and Shareholder Activism: Korean Evidence

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youngdeok Lim ◽  
Kooyul Jung
Author(s):  
F. Anto Manullang ◽  
Hendra Agustinus H. Marbun ◽  
Irene M Tarigan ◽  
Binsar Sihombing

ABSTRAK Tax avoidance merupakan upaya yang dilakuakan untuk pajak tanpa melanggar ketentuan perpajakan itu sendiri, Berbeda dengan tax evasion, yang merupakan kecurangan pajak dengan melanggar ketentuan-ketentuan pajak yang berlaku. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh variabel Penghindaran Pajak (Tax Avoidance) terhadap Biaya Utang.Sampel dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 46 perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder dari setiap perusahaan laporan tahunan perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama 3 tahun yaitu dari tahun 2015 sampai 2017. Pengambilan sampel dengan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Analisis data menggunakan analisis regresi linear berganda dengan menggunakan program spss. Pengujian hipotesis yang dilakukan dengan Uji Koefisien Determinasi,Uji F, dan Uji t.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa variabel Tax Avoidance tidak berpengaruh terhadap Cost Of Debt dan variabel kontrol Ukuran Perusahaan tidak berpengaruh terhadap biaya hutang, dan Return On Assets berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap Cost Of Debt pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia.Tax avoidance tidak berpengaruh terhadap cots of debt. Dalam penelitian ini dapat diketahui bahwa tax avoidance tidak dapat mempengaruhi cost of debt secra tersendiri, tax avoidance berpengaruh ketika size dan return on asset sebaagai variabel kontrol yang memperkuat pengaruh tax avoidance terhadap cots of debt. Periode penelitian ini juga dilakukan setelah pemerintah melakukan reformasi perpajakan dan juga dengan adanya Peraturan Menteri Keuangan No.169/PMK.010/2015 mengenai besaran perbandingan hutang dan modal perusahaan yang telah dikeluarkan pada tahun 2015 yang membuat perusahaan pada saat ini berhati-hati di dalam mengelola hutang. Kata kunci :Tax avoidance, Cost of debt, Perusahaan Manufaktur


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Nining Purwanti

The aim of the research is to analyze tax avoidance behavior to cost of debt moderated by tax rates changes, on manufacturing company in Indonesia in 2008-2010. Panel data analysis is used in this research. In this study usingbook tax gap to measure tax avoidance and using the models used by Lim (2010), Dwi Martani (2011) and Widya Sartika (2012) to meansure cost of debt. The study find that tax avoidance has negative influence on cost of debt. Tax avoidance creates a risk thereby increasing the cost of debt. In the period before tax rate reduction the influence of tax avoidance on cost of debt smaller compare after period of tax reduction, this indicates the presence of earning management conducted by the company before tax rate reduction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-60
Author(s):  
FAHREZA UTAMA ◽  
DWI JAYA KIRANA ◽  
KORNEL SITANGGANG

The aim of this study is to test the influence of tax avoidance towards the cost of debt moderated by institutional ownership. In this research, tax avoidance measured by proxy of Book Tax Different (BTD) and Cash Effective Tax Rate (CETR). The population in this research is manufacturing firms that listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) with 2015-2017 time periods. The amount of sample before outlier is 198 datas collected with purposive sampling method, then the amount of sample after outlier is 187 datas for first model and 186 datas for second model. Cross section data is used in this research. Multiple linear regression, determination coefficients, and partial test (t-test) is used with some help of programming data using SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solution) 23th version to analize in this research. The result of this study indicate tax avoidance has not significant influence towards the cost of debt, and institutional ownership can’t moderate the relationship between tax avoidance and the cost of debt.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-69
Author(s):  
Elvis Nopriyanti Sherly ◽  
Desi Fitria

The purpose of this study is to prove the effect of tax avoidance, institutional ownership, and profitability on cost of debt. The sample consisted of 71 manufactured firms in listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange from 2011-2015 by using a purposive sampling method. The results of the study showed that the tax avoidance had negative effect on cost of debt. The meaning is getting smaller Cash Effective Tax Rate the cost of debt incurred greater. The results of this study also showed that the institutional ownership doesn’t had effect on cost of debt. Furthermore, the result of Return on Assets (ROA) as proxy profitability had a negative effect on cost of debt. The meaning that the higher the profitability of the company then the company will have a high internal funds that can be used in making the use of debt financing is getting smaller which causes the cost of debt also becomes smaller.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-172
Author(s):  
Joonil Lee ◽  
Ahrum Choi ◽  
Philip Park

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (8/9) ◽  
pp. 683-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jost Hendrik Kovermann

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether tax avoidance has a positive or negative effect on firms’ cost of debt. It further investigates whether the implications for the cost of debt are different for tax avoidance and tax risk. Design/methodology/approach Based on a sample of 201 firms listed on Frankfurt Stock Exchange from 2009 to 2014, three tests are performed using pooled OLS regression. Controlling for numerous variables that have been found to influence the cost of debt, a first model examines the relationship between tax avoidance and the cost of debt. A second model examines the relationship between tax risk and the cost of debt and a third model interacts tax avoidance with tax risk. Findings The results show that tax avoidance has a negative effect on the cost of debt; however, tax risk increases the cost of debt. These results indicate that creditors generally view tax avoidance as positive and that tax avoidance is not regarded as inherently risky. Although tax avoidance is rewarded by capital markets with lower interest rates, tax risk contributes to higher interest rates. The effect of tax avoidance on the cost of debt depends therefore on the level of tax risk. Originality/value This paper contributes to two distinct strands of research: literature investigating the driving factors behind the cost of debt and literature investigating the consequences of firms’ tax avoidance activities.


2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 1517-1556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Cen ◽  
Naqiong Tong ◽  
Yushi Sun

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document