scholarly journals Shareholder Protection and Stock Market Development: An Empirical Test of the Legal Origins Hypothesis

Author(s):  
John Armour ◽  
Simon F. Deakin ◽  
Prabirjit Sarkar ◽  
Mathias M. Siems ◽  
Ajit Singh
2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Armour ◽  
Simon Deakin ◽  
Prabirjit Sarkar ◽  
Mathias Siems ◽  
Ajit Singh

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simplice A Asongu ◽  
Jacinta C Nwachukwu

This article assesses the effect of political institutions on stock market performance in 14 African countries for which stock market data are available for the period 1990–2010. The estimation technique used is a two-stage least-squares instrumental variable methodology. Political regime channels of democracy, polity and autocracy are instrumented with legal-origins, religious-legacies, income-levels and press-freedom qualities to account for stock market performance dynamics of capitalisation, value traded, turnover and number of listed companies. The findings show that countries with democratic regimes enjoy higher levels of financial market development compared to their counterparts with autocratic inclinations. As a policy implication, the role of sound political institutions has important effects on both the degree of competition for public office and the quality of public offices that favour stock market development on the African continent.


2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Xavier Rathinam ◽  
A. V. Raja

This paper tries to determine the long run equilibrium relationship between shareholder protection and stock market development and ultimately their relationship with economic growth in the context of India. A number of causality tests are employed to investigate the long run causal relationship in a system consisting of stock market development, legal development and economic growth. While developments in procedural law and investor protection cause market capitalization, the relationship between stock market and economic growth is ambiguous as the relationship is not consistent for different indicators of stock market development which is contrary to most of the existing literature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document