U.S. Tax Reforms and Their Effects on Average Tax Rates

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Tax Rates ◽  
Tax Reforms

Integrating Microsimulation Models of Tax Policy into a DGE Macroeconomic Model

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason DeBacker ◽  
Richard W. Evans ◽  
Kerk L. Phillips
Keyword(s):  
General Equilibrium ◽  
Equilibrium Model ◽  
Tax Policy ◽  
General Equilibrium Model ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Tax Reforms ◽  
Macroeconomic Analysis ◽  
The Rich ◽  
Microsimulation Models ◽  
High Degree

This article proposes a method for integrating individual effective tax rates and marginal tax rates computed from a microsimulation (partial equilibrium) model of tax policy with a dynamic general equilibrium model of tax policy that can provide macroeconomic analysis or dynamic scores of tax reforms. Our approach captures the rich heterogeneity, realistic demographics, and tax-code detail of the microsimulation model and allows this detail to inform a general equilibrium model with a relatively high degree of heterogeneity. In addition, we propose a functional form in which tax rates depend jointly on the levels of both capital income and labor income.

scholarly journals Is NY's Supply-side Experiment Working? A Preliminary Analysis using County Unemployment Rates

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-266
Author(s):  
Lynn B. Snarr ◽  
Hal Snarr ◽  
Dan Friesner
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
The State ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Free Enterprise ◽  
Corporate Tax ◽  
Tax Reforms ◽  
Tax Rate ◽  
Start Up ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Business Tax

The State of New York recently enacted business tax reforms. The first legislative act launched the START-UP NY program in 2014. It created tax free enterprise zones throughout the state to incentivize business incubation within, or relocation of existing firms to, the State of New York. In that same year, the state lowered its corporate tax rate state-wide from 7.1% to 6.5% in 2016. We use a difference-in-differences (DID) methodology, evaluated using county-level data, to empirically test whether New York’s recent business tax reforms significantly reduce unemployment, beyond what would exist in the absence of the reforms. We fail to find significant evidence that START-UP NY affects unemployment during the period studied, 2014-2017.  We do, however, find evidence suggesting that New York lowering its corporate tax rates in 2016 is associated with a large reduction in unemployment (by approximately 90,000 jobs) in 2016 and a smaller reduction (by approximately 25,000 jobs) in 2017.

TAXATION SYSTEM OF UZBEKISTAN: INFLUENCE OF TAX REFORMS ON SMALL ENTERPRISES

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makhamadali Dekhanov
Keyword(s):  
Tax Policy ◽  
Small And Medium Enterprises ◽  
Small Enterprises ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Tax Reforms ◽  
Single Tax ◽  
Business Conditions ◽  
The Government ◽  
Medium Enterprises ◽  
Taxation System

    The problems of SME development and high tax rates have always been one of the most important social problems in any state. In recent years the taxation issue has gained a very big importance from the government policymakers. Politicians suggest further decrease of tax rates for small and medium enterprises and also improvement of single tax policy. This paper is dedicated to the analysis of influence of tax reforms on small enterprises in Uzbekistan.. Particularly it analysis how single tax effects the development and functioning of the SMEs. The base hypothesis used in this research paper is Laffer’ hypothesis, which states that decrease of tax rates will encourage the development of the enterprises and will raise more government revenues. This effect will be achieved through better business conditions, which ensures the financial sustainability of the business. Another point is the lower avoidance rate, where enterprises will not be more needed to hide their revenues and avoid taxes.The research results showed that implementation of lower tax rates and single tax policy, positively effect the development of the SME sector. Despite the policies and actions taken by government authorities, there is still space for improvements.

scholarly journals Implications of dividend tax reforms on M-REITs performance

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nur Adiana Hiau Abdullah ◽  
Kamarun Nisham Taufil Mohd ◽  
Woei Chyuan Wong
Keyword(s):  
Investment Decision ◽  
Equity Market ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Total Risk ◽  
Tax Reforms ◽  
Treasury Bills ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Fund Managers ◽  
Investment Decision Making ◽  
Dividend Tax

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the performance of 19 Malaysian Real Estate Investment Trusts (M-REITs) over the period 1999 to 2014, following the implementation of dividend tax reforms announced in the 2007, 2009 and 2012 budgets. Design/methodology/approach Sharpe index, Treynor index and Jensen α are utilized to compare the performance of M-REITs against a newly developed tax-adjusted value-weighted M-REITs index, equity market, property sector and three month Malaysia Treasury Bills (T-Bills). The calculation of M-REITs returns has been adjusted to take into account the dividend tax reforms which have never been considered in previous studies. Findings Most M-REITs outperform the tax-adjusted value-weighted REITs index, equity market, property sector and three month T-Bills. Property sector performs worst during those periods. Some of the M-REITs have a higher standard deviation than the equity market and the tax-adjusted value-weighted M-REITs index. Most M-REITs have a lower total risk than the property sector. Further analysis shows that before (after) the tax reforms, most M-REITs underperform (outperform) the other sectors. The introduction of the tax reforms benefits both REITs and investors. A significant positive Jensen α for some M-REITs indicates that fund managers are able to time the market or to select undervalued assets. Practical implications Findings of the study would enable investors to evaluate the performance of all REITs in comparison to other financial assets during the period of study for better investment decision making. A more accurate assessment on REITs performance that take into account the tax reforms, is available for investors and fund managers to decide on the investment mix to be included in their portfolio. Moreover, fund managers’ performance can be assessed whether they perform better or worse than the equity market, property sector and three month T-Bills. Originality/value This study contributes to the scant literature on dividend tax reforms and their implication toward REITs performance. It is the first study to thoroughly assess the returns of REITs by taking into account the changes on dividend tax rates announced in the 2007, 2009 and 2012 budgets.

Top Income Shares and the Difficulties of Using Tax Data

2020 ◽  
pp. 125-152
Author(s):  
Gerald Auten ◽  
David Splinter
Keyword(s):  
Tax Rates ◽  
Social Changes ◽  
Tax Reforms ◽  
Effective Tax Rates ◽  
Tax System ◽  
Low Incomes ◽  
Top Income Shares ◽  
Tax Returns ◽  
Per Capita ◽  
Over Time

This chapter reconsiders income methods of estimating of inequality using US tax data. It presents a new approach that accounts for the effects of important social changes, tax reforms, technical tax issues, and the 40 percent of income missing from tax returns. Results suggest much smaller increases in top 1 percent shares of pre-tax income. After accounting for taxes and transfers, top 1 percent shares changed little since 1962. This resulted from substantial increases in transfers and increased overall progressivity of the tax system. While effective tax rates for the top 1 percent show little trend, they declined for the bottom 50 percent. Rather than stagnating, per capita real incomes of the bottom half of the population increased over time. Rather than increasing and capturing most economic growth, incomes of those starting at the top decreased while those starting with low incomes received most of the growth.

India’s Transition from State Level Sales Tax to Value Added Tax (VAT)

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vandana Jain
Keyword(s):  
Value Added ◽  
State Level ◽  
Sales Tax ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Value Added Tax ◽  
Commodity Taxation ◽  
Tax Reforms ◽  
Tax Regimes ◽  
Phase Out

An outstanding development in the sphere of State finances since Independence has been the precipitous growth in the relative revenue significance of sales tax levied under entry 54 of List II in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. It has grown considerably in depth and coverage, and forms the mainstay of States. tax revenue. Prior to tax reforms initiated in early 1990s, sales tax was characterised by a multiplicity of tax rates and exemptions, lack of uniformity across States, large number of exemptions and concessions, and differing procedures for tax collection. In mid-1990s, most states had agreed to phase out the incentive-related exemptions and implement floor rates of sales tax. As part of the nation-wide efforts to redesign commodity taxation and the implementation of CENVAT at the level of the Centre, many States have modified their sales tax regimes to launch a state level VAT under the scheme prepared by the Empowered Committee for this purpose. This paper explains and examines various problems associated with sales tax and its switch over to Value Added Tax (VAT) in recent years.

scholarly journals Tax Reforms and Intertemporal Shifting of Wage Income: Evidence from Danish Monthly Payroll Records

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus Thustrup Kreiner ◽  
Søren Leth-Petersen ◽  
Peer Ebbesen Skov
Keyword(s):  
Tax Reform ◽  
Liquidity Constraints ◽  
Labor Income ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Tax Reforms ◽  
Taxable Income ◽  
Elasticity Of Taxable Income ◽  
Marginal Tax Rates ◽  
Willingness To Cooperate ◽  
Wage Income

This paper uses monthly payroll records for all Danish employees to identify widespread intertemporal shifting of labor income in response to a tax reform that significantly reduced the marginal tax rates for one-fourth of all employees. When ignoring shifting, the estimate of the overall elasticity of taxable income equals 0.1, and the elasticity is increasing with earnings. When removing the shifting component, the elasticity is close to zero at all earnings levels. The evidence also indicates that tax salience, liquidity constraints and firm willingness to cooperate in shifting are important factors in explaining shifting behavior. (JEL H24, H31, J22, J31)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document