scholarly journals Choice, Rationality and Welfare Measurement

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry R. Green ◽  
Daniel A. Hojman
Keyword(s):  
Welfare Measurement

Welfare Measurement with Expenditure-Constrained Demand Models

1989 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Mendelsohn ◽  
George Peterson
Keyword(s):  
Demand Models ◽  
Welfare Measurement

Tax Reform and Welfare Measurement: Do We Need Demand System Estimation?

1996 ◽  
Vol 106 (438) ◽  
pp. 1227 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Banks ◽  
Richard Blundell ◽  
Arthur Lewbel
Keyword(s):  
Tax Reform ◽  
Demand System ◽  
Welfare Measurement ◽  
Demand System Estimation

Social Accounting and Welfare Measurement in a Growth Model with Human Capital

1996 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Aronsson ◽  
Karl-Gustaf Löfgren ◽  
Karl-Gustaf Lofgren
Keyword(s):  
Human Capital ◽  
Growth Model ◽  
Social Accounting ◽  
Welfare Measurement

Durable goods and welfare measurement

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Amendola ◽  
Giovanni Vecchi
Keyword(s):  
Durable Goods ◽  
Welfare Measurement

Measuring the welfare of sub-groups subject to premature mortality

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 722-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.P. Doessel ◽  
Ruth F. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Social Welfare ◽  
Measurement Problem ◽  
Economic Effect ◽  
Premature Mortality ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Series Data ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Social Loss ◽  
The Social ◽  
Welfare Measurement

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide an exposition of the concepts relevant to measuring the economic effect of premature mortality and the conception of how the social loss from premature mortality can be incorporated into social welfare measurement. None of the conventional welfare measures currently pick up this welfare signal. Design/methodology/approach – Various concepts are examined in the conventional and “new” literatures of welfare measurement. Six Venn diagrams show how various concepts “fit together”. Findings – This paper outlines a framework for measuring the economic effect of premature mortality in a conceptually appropriate way. Thus the paper shows how the welfare loss associated with premature mortality can be incorporated into social welfare measurement. Research limitations/implications – Accurate premature mortality measurement is difficult but this data problem hardly limits this exercise. Sensitivity analyses can alleviate this measurement problem. Practical implications – The main practical implication is that empirical applications are feasible. Time series data can be analysed from this conceptual framework to determine whether the problem of the social loss from premature mortality is improving through time, or worsening. Social implications – Knowing the size of the welfare impact of premature mortality is useful not only on policy fronts concerning premature mortality prevention. Originality/value – “New welfare measurement” has not yet been applied to the notion of the social loss from premature mortality.

A Welfare Measurement of China's Rural Forestry Reform During the 1980s

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 1755-1767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Runsheng Yin ◽  
Jintao Xu
Keyword(s):  
Welfare Measurement
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document