Influence of Liquid Manure on Soil Denitrifier Abundance, Denitrification, and Nitrous Oxide Emissions

2009 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 760-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.N. Miller ◽  
B.J. Zebarth ◽  
C.E. Dandie ◽  
D.L. Burton ◽  
C. Goyer ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 571-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Smith ◽  
R. Gordon ◽  
C. Bourque ◽  
A. Campbell

Surface-applied swine manure has the potential to generate ammonia (NH3), nitrous oxide (N2O) and odour. Field research was conducted in Prince Edward Island to measure the simultaneous emissions of NH3, N2O and odour following the surface-application of swine manure. Manure was applied to a grain stubble field consisting of a sandy loam soil low in pH (5.6–5.9). The effect of manure type (liquid and solid), application rate [conventional/typical rate (1 ×): 30 000-36 000 L ha-1, double (2 ×): 60 000-72 000 L ha-1 and five times (5 ×): 180 000 L ha-1] and rainfall (8–200 mm) before and after liquid manure application were examined. There was no relationship between odour emissions and manure type, application rate and rainfall before and after spreading, due to high variability. Liquid manure (dry matter (DM = 45 g kg-1) reduced NH3 emissions by 32% compared with solid (DM = 350 g kg-1). Increasing application rates enhanced NH3 emissions; increasing the rate by 2 × and 5 × the typical rate increased losses by 62 and 78%, respectively. Applying manure prior to rainfall reduced NH3 emissions by 37%, compared with application after a rainfall. Ammonia and odour emissions were similarly correlated to atmospheric conditions with increased emissions at higher air and soil temperature, net radiation, vapour pressure deficit and windspeed. Nitrous oxide emissions were low in magnitude and showed no correlation to climatic conditions, suggesting that management strategies to reduce both odour and NH3 did not enhance N2O emissions when applied to a moderately acidic soil with low levels of soil nitrate (< 5 mg N kg-1). Our results indicate that for conditions similar to those in this study, there is no trade-off between NH3 and N2O production and more attention should be placed on controlling and reducing odour and NH3 emissions. Key words: Ammonia, nitrous oxide, odour, swine manure, management strategies


2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 1666-1675
Author(s):  
Hai-Ming TANG ◽  
Xiao-Ping XIAO ◽  
Wen-Guang TANG ◽  
Guang-Li YANG

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Khadim Dawar ◽  
Shah Fahad ◽  
M. M. R. Jahangir ◽  
Iqbal Munir ◽  
Syed Sartaj Alam ◽  
...  

AbstractIn this study, we explored the role of biochar (BC) and/or urease inhibitor (UI) in mitigating ammonia (NH3) and nitrous oxide (N2O) discharge from urea fertilized wheat cultivated fields in Pakistan (34.01°N, 71.71°E). The experiment included five treatments [control, urea (150 kg N ha−1), BC (10 Mg ha−1), urea + BC and urea + BC + UI (1 L ton−1)], which were all repeated four times and were carried out in a randomized complete block design. Urea supplementation along with BC and BC + UI reduced soil NH3 emissions by 27% and 69%, respectively, compared to sole urea application. Nitrous oxide emissions from urea fertilized plots were also reduced by 24% and 53% applying BC and BC + UI, respectively, compared to urea alone. Application of BC with urea improved the grain yield, shoot biomass, and total N uptake of wheat by 13%, 24%, and 12%, respectively, compared to urea alone. Moreover, UI further promoted biomass and grain yield, and N assimilation in wheat by 38%, 22% and 27%, respectively, over sole urea application. In conclusion, application of BC and/or UI can mitigate NH3 and N2O emissions from urea fertilized soil, improve N use efficiency (NUE) and overall crop productivity.


Eos ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 89 (51) ◽  
pp. 529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Del Grosso ◽  
Tom Wirth ◽  
Stephen M. Ogle ◽  
William J. Parton

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debasish Saha ◽  
Jason P. Kaye ◽  
Arnab Bhowmik ◽  
Mary Ann Bruns ◽  
John M. Wallace ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arezoo Taghizadeh-Toosi ◽  
Baldur Janz ◽  
Rodrigo Labouriau ◽  
Jørgen E. Olesen ◽  
Klaus Butterbach-Bahl ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. 108197
Author(s):  
Hollie E. Emery ◽  
John H. Angell ◽  
Akaash Tawade ◽  
Robinson W. Fulweiler

Author(s):  
Muhammad Khalid Anser ◽  
Danish Iqbal Godil ◽  
Muhammad Azhar Khan ◽  
Abdelmohsen A. Nassani ◽  
Khalid Zaman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. e00362
Author(s):  
Liliana I. Picone ◽  
Cimelio Bayer ◽  
Cecilia C. Videla ◽  
Roberto H. Rizzalli ◽  
Sheila M. Casanave Ponti ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document