scholarly journals Timing of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application for Annual Ryegrass Overseeded into Unimproved Perennial Warm‐season Pasture

cftm ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
P. W. Bartholomew
Keyword(s):  
Nitrogen Fertilizer ◽  
Warm Season ◽  
Fertilizer Application ◽  
Annual Ryegrass

Influence of a BactoFil microbiological preparation on the intensity of infection by Rhizoctonia solani and the effects on sugar beet yield and quality

2012 ◽  
pp. 102-109
Author(s):  
Suzana Kristek ◽  
Andrija Kristek ◽  
Dragana Kocevski ◽  
Antonija K. Jankovi ◽  
Dražen Juriši
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Rhizoctonia Solani ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizer ◽  
Soil Analysis ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Sugar Content ◽  
Pathogenic Fungi ◽  
Fertilizer Application ◽  
Beet Root ◽  
Set Up

The experiment was set up on two types of the soil: Mollic Gleysols (FAO, 1998) and Eutric Cambisols where the presence of pathogenic fungi – sugar beet root decay agent – Rhizoctonia solani has been detected since 2005. In a two year study (2008, 2009), the experiment was set up by completely randomized block design in 4 repetitions and 16 different variants. Two beet varieties, Belinda, sensitive to pathogenic fungi R. solani, and Laetitia, tolerant to pathogenic fungi R. solani), were grown. The microbiological preparation BactoFil was applied in different amounts in autumn and spring. In addition, the nitrogen fertilizer application, based on the results of soil analysis, was varied. The following parameters were tested: amount of infected and decayed plants, root yield, sugar content, sugar in molasses and sugar yield. The best results were obtained by applying the microbiological preparation BactoFil, and by 30% reduced nitrogen fertilizer application. Preparation dosage and time of application depended on soil properties.

Components of test weight of ten varieties of winter wheat grown with two rates of nitrogen fertilizer application

1975 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 559-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona M. Pushman ◽  
J. Bingham
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Protein Content ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizer ◽  
Ventral Surface ◽  
Fertilizer Application ◽  
Test Weight ◽  
Varietal Differences ◽  
Flour Yield ◽  
Packing Efficiency ◽  
Xylene Separation

SUMMARYVarietal and environmental factors which influence test weight were investigated in a field trial with ten varieties of winter wheat and two rates of nitrogen fertilizer. Varietal differences in test weight were correlated positively with the protein content of the grain and inversely with grain yield but they were not related to 1000-grain weight or to flour yield. Variation in test weight associated with varietal and environmental effects in protein content was due to differences in the density of the grain, as measured by displacement of xylene. Separation into density grades within a sample by a flotation method showed a similar relationship with protein content. There were also varietal differences in packing efficiency of the grain. In the case of Maris Huntsman a poor packing efficiency was considered to stem from morphological features of the floret and developing grain which lead to characteristic transverse folds in the ventral surface of the mature grain. For wheat grown in the United Kingdom, test weight may provide a useful guide to flour yield for samples of one variety but it is likely to be misleading for comparisons between varieties.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document