Integrating Cotton and Beef Production in the Texas Southern High Plains: I. Water Use and Measures of Productivity

2012 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. 1625-1642 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. G. Allen ◽  
C. P. Brown ◽  
R. Kellison ◽  
P. Green ◽  
C. J. Zilverberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Use ◽  
High Plains ◽  
Beef Production ◽  
Southern High Plains

Integrating Cotton and Beef Production to Reduce Water Withdrawal from the Ogallala Aquifer in the Southern High Plains

2005 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 556-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. G. Allen ◽  
C. P. Brown ◽  
R. Kellison ◽  
E. Segarra ◽  
T. Wheeler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Withdrawal ◽  
High Plains ◽  
Ogallala Aquifer ◽  
Beef Production ◽  
Southern High Plains

scholarly journals Evaluating the Possibility of a Water Trading Scenario Coupled With Water Use Restriction in the Texas Southern High Plains

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 194
Author(s):  
Kishor Luitel ◽  
Rachna Tewari ◽  
Donna Mitchell ◽  
Aaron Benson ◽  
Phil Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Water Use ◽  
High Plains ◽  
Southern High Plains ◽  
Water Trading

Integrating Cotton and Beef Production in the Texas Southern High Plains: III. An Economic Evaluation

2013 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 929-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip Johnson ◽  
Cody John Zilverberg ◽  
Vivien G. Allen ◽  
Justin Weinheimer ◽  
Philip Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
High Plains ◽  
Beef Production ◽  
Southern High Plains

Yield Determination and Water-Use Efficiency of Wheat under Water-Limited Conditions in the U.S. Southern High Plains

Crop Science ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. Xue ◽  
J. C. Rudd ◽  
S. Liu ◽  
K. E. Jessup ◽  
R. N. Devkota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Use Efficiency ◽  
Water Use ◽  
High Plains ◽  
Southern High Plains ◽  
Yield Determination ◽  
Use Efficiency ◽  
The U.S

Integrating Cotton and Beef Production in the Texas Southern High Plains: II. Fossil Fuel Use

2012 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. 1643-1651 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Zilverberg ◽  
V. G. Allen ◽  
C. P. Brown ◽  
P. Green ◽  
P. Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fossil Fuel ◽  
High Plains ◽  
Beef Production ◽  
Fuel Use ◽  
Southern High Plains

Evaluation of Cotton Establishment Strategies Using Subsurface Drip Irrigation (SDI) in the Southern High Plains of Texas

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 891-904
Author(s):  
James P. Bordovsky ◽  
Joseph T. Mustian
Keyword(s):  
Water Use ◽  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Subsurface Drip Irrigation ◽  
High Plains ◽  
Plant Establishment ◽  
Southern High Plains ◽  
Planting Dates ◽  
Traditional Treatment ◽  
Plant Stand ◽  
Subsurface Drip

Abstract.HighlightsPlanting date and crop row distance from SDI laterals affect final cotton plant population, lint yield and water use.Cotton rows directly above 2.03-m spaced SDI laterals should only be used late within the cotton planting window.Positioning pairs of rows nearer to 2.03-m spaced SDI laterals increased yield compared to evenly spaced rows.SDI laterals spaced 1.02 m versus 2.03 m apart increased cotton yield by 5% and water use efficiency by 7%. In the Texas High Plains (THP), water table declines in the Ogallala Aquifer and the high evaporative environment have helped motivate the transition from surface and center pivot irrigation to subsurface drip irrigation (SDI). A major challenge to wider adoption of SDI in the region is inconsistent cotton seed germination and plant establishment due to dry overwinter conditions, the difficulty of “pushing” irrigation water upward into the seed germination zone, and the high evaporative environment during the optimum cotton planting period. To evaluate strategies for improving cotton establishment using SDI in the Southern High Plains (SHP) of Texas, a field experiment having five crop row/ SDI lateral configurations, each with two planting dates, was conducted from 2013 to 2018 at the Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center in Halfway, Texas. Differences in final plant stands, cotton yields, cotton fiber qualities, and water productivities were determined. Averaged over planting dates and years, planting directly over 1.02-m spaced SDI laterals (Every-Row configuration) increased final plant stand by 9.5%, cotton yield by 5.1%, irrigation water use efficiencies (IWUE) by 6.7%, and irrigation value (IValue) by 6.1% over planting pairs of 1.02-m spaced rows equidistant and parallel to 2.03-m spaced laterals (Traditional configuration). Compared to the Traditional configuration, planting pairs of cotton rows 0.76 m apart with both rows closer to 2.03-m spaced SDI laterals (30-50 configuration) increased final plant stand by 9.5% and yield by 3.0%. Considering additional treatments with 2.03-m spaced cotton rows planted directly over 2.03-m spaced SDI laterals (Skip-Row configuration) and 1.02-m spaced cotton rows having one row directly over 2.03-m spaced laterals and one row “not irrigated” (Skip-Row Plus configuration), early plantings resulted in five-year yields of 1400 and 1600 kg ha-1, respectively. However, these yields were less than those from the late planted, Traditional treatment at 1620 kg ha-1. Also, IValues and IWUEs of both Skip-Row treatments were significantly lower (p<0.05) than those of the Traditional treatment. Based on these results, the Skip-Row or Skip-Row Plus configurations should only be used late in the cotton planting period when soil water is not available for plant establishment using the Traditional or 30-50 configurations. Advantages of Every-Row and 30-50 over the Traditional configuration must be weighed against their increased costs. Keywords: Cotton, Germination, Irrigation, Southern High Plains, Subsurface drip irrigation (SDI).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document