Hard Red Spring Wheat Response to Row Spacing, Seeding Rate, and Nitrogen

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 1296-1302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengci Chen ◽  
Karnes Neill ◽  
Dave Wichman ◽  
Malvern Westcott
Keyword(s):  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Seeding Rate ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat

Wheat seeding rate for spread and distinct row seed placement with air seeders

2001 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 885-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian M. Johnston ◽  
F. Craig Stevenson
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Grain Yield ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Yield Potential ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
N Availability ◽  
Seeding Rate ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat ◽  
Seed Placement

Air (pneumatic) seeding systems that have seed row opener options that spread seed rather than place it in distinct rows may allow producers to uniformly distribute plants and increase seeding rates to improve cereal crop yield. A study was conducted to determine if seed placement configuration influenced hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) response to seeding rate. The study was carried out at Melfort, SK, from 1997 to 1999, using three seed configurations (23 cm and 30 cm distinct row with a hoe opener; and a 20 cm spread using a 28 cm sweep on 23 cm row spacing) and four seeding rates (67, 100, 134, and 167 kg ha–1). Grain yield increased 6% when seeding rate was increased from 100 (recommended rate) to 168 kg ha–1 in 1997. Improved grain yield with increased seeding rates was related to greater kernels head–1. In the 2 following years, yield decreased by 9% when seeding rate was increased from 100 to 168 kg ha–1. Yield reductions in these years were associated with high yield potential (high soil N availability) and lodging, that in turn resulted in decreased kernels head–1 and kernel weight with increased seeding rates. Grain yield did not differ between the sweep and distinct rows, regardless of the seeding rate. Furthermore, the similar yields among the three seed configurations occurred despite lodging being less with sweeps compared with 23 or 30 cm row spacing at the highest seeding rate in 1998. The increased distance between wheat plants with sweeps did not improve grain yields as a result of reduced inter-plant competition, regardless of seeding rate. This absence of grain yield differences between the sweep and distinct row placement illustrates the yield stability associated with Canadian hard red spring wheat cultivars through yield component compensation. Key words: Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), row spacing, seeding rate, lodging, seed placement

scholarly journals Seeding Rate Effects on Hybrid Spring Wheat Yield, Yield Components and Quality

Agronomy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1240
Author(s):  
Peder K. Schmitz ◽  
Joel K. Ransom
Keyword(s):  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Yield Components ◽  
Wheat Yield ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Yield Component ◽  
Economic Feasibility ◽  
Protein Yield ◽  
Seeding Rate ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat ◽  
End Use

Agronomic practices, such as planting date, seeding rate, and genotype, commonly influence hard red spring wheat (HRSW, Triticum aestivum L. emend. Thell.) production. Determining the agronomic optimum seeding rate (AOSR) of newly developed hybrids is needed as they respond to seeding rates differently from inbred cultivars. The objectives of this research were to determine the AOSR of new HRSW hybrids, how seeding rate alters their various yield components, and whether hybrids offer increased end-use quality, compared to conventional cultivars. The performance of two cultivars (inbreds) and five hybrids was evaluated in nine North Dakota environments at five seeding rates in 2019−2020. Responses to seeding rate for yield and protein yield differed among the genotypes. The AOSR ranged from 3.60 to 5.19 million seeds ha−1 and 2.22 to 3.89 million seeds ha−1 for yield and protein yield, respectively. The average AOSR for yield for the hybrids was similar to that of conventional cultivars. However, the maximum protein yield of the hybrids was achieved at 0.50 million seeds ha−1 less than that of the cultivars tested. The yield component that explained the greatest proportion of differences in yield as seeding rates varied was kernels spike−1 (r = 0.17 to 0.43). The end-use quality of the hybrids tested was not superior to that of the conventional cultivars, indicating that yield will likely be the determinant of the economic feasibility of any future released hybrids.

scholarly journals Effect of Row Spacing and Seeding Rate on Russian Thistle (Salsola tragus) in Spring Barley and Spring Wheat

Plants ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 126
Author(s):  
Judit Barroso ◽  
Nicholas G. Genna
Keyword(s):  
Seed Production ◽  
Crop Yield ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Plant Biomass ◽  
Integrated Management ◽  
Spring Barley ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Crop Productivity ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Seeding Rate

Russian thistle (Salsola tragus L.) is a persistent post-harvest issue in the Pacific Northwest (PNW). Farmers need more integrated management strategies to control it. Russian thistle emergence, mortality, plant biomass, seed production, and crop yield were evaluated in spring wheat and spring barley planted in 18- or 36-cm row spacing and seeded at 73 or 140 kg ha−1 in Pendleton and Moro, Oregon, during 2018 and 2019. Russian thistle emergence was lower and mortality was higher in spring barley than in spring wheat. However, little to no effect of row spacing or seeding rate was observed on Russian thistle emergence or mortality. Russian thistle seed production and plant biomass followed crop productivity; higher crop yield produced higher Russian thistle biomass and seed production and lower crop yield produced lower weed biomass and seed production. Crop yield with Russian thistle pressure was improved in 2018 with 18-cm rows or by seeding at 140 kg ha−1 while no effect was observed in 2019. Increasing seeding rates or planting spring crops in narrow rows may be effective at increasing yield in low rainfall years of the PNW, such as in 2018. No effect may be observed in years with higher rainfall than normal, such as in 2019.

GROWING SUNFLOWERS IN SOUTHWESTERN SASKATCHEWAN

1982 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-316
Author(s):  
D. W. L. READ ◽  
C. H. ANDERSON ◽  
C. A. CAMPBELL
Keyword(s):  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Deleterious Effect ◽  
Wind Erosion ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Nitrogen Use ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat ◽  
Alternative Crop ◽  
P Fertilizer ◽  
Summer Fallow

Sunflower is a possible alternative crop to hard red spring wheat in semiarid southwestern Saskatchewan. To date, little research has been done on sunflowers in this region. A study was carried out to determine the proper row spacing at which this crop should be grown. At the same time, it was necessary to determine whether sunflowers would leave sufficient residues to protect the soil from wind erosion while encouraging overwinter snow conservation. Sunflowers were grown on summer fallow at 18-, 36- and 53-cm row spacing, with and without added P fertilizer, over a 5-yr period. Hard red spring wheat was grown for comparison. A row spacing of 36 cm produced greater sunflower yields than did row spacings of 18 or 53 cm. Fertilizer increased the yield of 18-cm spacing slightly only in wet years. Yield of wheat was 1.9–3.5 times as great as that of sunflowers. Sunflowers had no deleterious effect on the yield of a subsequent wheat crop. There was no difference between sunflowers and wheat regarding their effect on soil erosiveness or water and nitrogen use.

Effects of row spacing, seeding rate and seed-placed phosphorus on root diseases of spring wheat and barley under zero tillage

1998 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. L. Bailey ◽  
Guy P. Lafond ◽  
Daryl Domitruk
Keyword(s):  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Root Rot ◽  
Cultural Practices ◽  
Wheat Yield ◽  
Gaeumannomyces Graminis ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Zero Tillage ◽  
Seeding Rate ◽  
Root Diseases ◽  
Take All

Changes in tillage and other agronomic practices have shown benefits of increased grain yield for many crops, but these changes may alter the micro-environment resulting in changes to populations of disease-causing agents and other micro-organisms. This study examined the effects of row spacing (10, 20, 30 cm), seeding rate (54, 108, 161 kg ha−1 for barley; 67, 134, 202 kg ha−1 for spring wheat) and seed-placed phosphorus (0, 8, 16 kg ha−1) on root diseases in spring wheat and barley using a zero-tillage production system in four environments. Root rot severity was assessed by visual ratings and the causal agents were identified. Analyses of variance indicated significant differences in root rot severity and the incidence of some causal agents for the main treatment effects (i.e. row spacing, seeding rate, seed-placed phosphorus) and no significant interactions between locations, years, and cultural practices. Contrasts of treatment means showed that higher rates of seeding decreased root rot severity and the incidence of Fusarium in wheat but these effects were small (less than 6%). The higher rates of monoammonium phosphate fertilizer reduced root rot severity in barley by 7% and the incidence of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici in wheat by greater than 40%. Wider row spacings showed a small reduction of 6% in root rot severity in wheat but mostly had no effect on root diseases. Wheat yields were negatively associated with root rot severity in three of four environments. Fertility, root rot severity, and seeding rate had the greatest impact on wheat yield. Root diseases did not affect barley yields. Therefore, the use of wider row spacings and higher seeding rates with zero tillage practices will not lead to adverse effects on root diseases in wheat and barley. Phosphorus fertilizer should be used to reduce losses resulting from take-all disease in wheat. Key words: Zero tillage, cultural practices, common root rot, take-all, cereals

scholarly journals Influence of row spacing and seeding rate on crop yields cultivated by “No-Till” technology in Kulunda steppe (Altai Region)

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-338
Author(s):  
V. I. Belyaev ◽  
T. Meinel ◽  
N. V. Rudev ◽  
L.-Ch. Grunwald ◽  
L. V. Sokolova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crop Rotation ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Field Experience ◽  
Crop Yields ◽  
Yield Enhancement ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Seeding Rate ◽  
Altai Region ◽  
No Till ◽  
Combine Harvesters

The long-term field experience has been carried out in the LLC Farm Enterprise “Partner”, Mikhailovsky District of the Altai Region, one of the basic sites of the “Kulunda” project. The field experience was founded in 2013, implemented over the next four years in a similar way; the alternation of crops was carried out in accordance to the crop rotation. In total, there were four sets of experiments in eight variants in triple number of replications. There were four variants of row spacing implemented: 25.0 cm, 33.3 cm, 37.5 cm, and 50.0 cm. We also used two seeding rates for every crop: spring wheat - 75 and 120 kg/ha; rapeseed – 2 and 4 kg/ha; peas – 140 and 180 kg/ha. The sowing was made with an expimental grain seeder “Cornor-DMC” with chisel-shaped copying coulters, the “Amazone” company production. Combine harvesters “Lexion” (peas and rapeseed) and “Sampo” (wheat) carried out harvesting in August-September. As an object of research, the technological process of cultivation of agricultural crops in the crop rotation of spring wheat–pea–spring wheat–rape was considered. The influence of the row spacing and the seeding rate on the yield was evaluated. An increase in row spacing from 25 cm to 50 cm leads to an almost linear decrease in the yield of crops. The increasing of the seeding rate in the studied limits leads to the yield enhancement. The obtained data will allow substantiating the rational row spacing, design of the sowing complex and seeding rate. This is extremely important for introducing the “No-Till” technology in the arid steppe of the Altai Region.

Registration of ‘Duclair’ Hard Red Spring Wheat

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Lanning ◽  
G. R. Carlson ◽  
P. F. Lamb ◽  
D. Nash ◽  
D. M. Wichman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat

Hybrid Vigor in Hard Red Spring Wheat Crosses 1

Crop Science ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 220-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darrell. G. Wells ◽  
Charles L. Lay
Keyword(s):  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Hybrid Vigor ◽  
Hard Red Spring Wheat
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document