Application of Site-Specific Farming in a Sustainable Agriculture Project at Chesapeake Farms

Author(s):  
D. Raymond Forney ◽  
Larry D. Gaultney
2018 ◽  
pp. 91-92
Author(s):  
Márta Birkás

Soil management represents two important tasks that are harmonization of the soil protection with demands of the crop to be grown on the given land under prevailing farming condition. Further goals are to preserve and/or develop the soil physical, biological and chemical condition and to avoid the unfavourable changes of the soil biological activity and the soil structure. Classical authors emphasised the importance of creating proper seedbed for plants. In the physical approach, tillage was believed to play an important role in controlling soil processes. Consequently, the period of several centuries dominated by this approach is referred to as the era of crop-oriented tillage (Birkás et al., 2017). The overestimation of the importance of crop requirements resulted in damaging the soils, which inevitably led to turn to the soil-focused tillage. Since the first years of climate change, as the new trends have raised concern, tillage must be turned into a climate-focused effort with the aim of reducing climate-induced stresses through improving soil quality. The development of soil management has always been determined by the economical background. At the same time, deteriorating site conditions have contributed to the conception of new tillage trends by forcing producers to find new solutions (e.g. dry farming theory in the past or adaptable tillage theory nowadays). Győrffy (2009) recited the most important keywords were listed in 2001 and that seemed to be important in the future of crop production. These keywords (endeavours) were as follows: − Biofarming, organic farming, alternative farming, biodynamic farming, low input sustainable agriculture; − Mid-tech farming, sustainable agriculture, soil conservation farming, no till farming, environmentally sound, environmentally friendly, diversity farming; − Crop production system, integrated pest management, integrated farming, high-tech farming; − Site specific production, site-specific technology, spatial variable technology, satellite farming; − Precision farming. Győrffy’s prognosis proved to be realistic and the efforts mentioned above have mostly been implemented. New challenges have also appeared in soil management in relation to the last decades. The most important endeavours for the future are: 1) Preserving climate-induced stresses endangering soils. 2) Turn to use climate mitigation soil tillage and crop production systems. 3) Applying soil management methods are adaptable to the different soil moisture content (over dried or wet may be quite common). 4) Use effectual water conservation tillage. 5) Use soil condition specific tillage depth and method. 6) Adapting the water and soil conservation methods in irrigation. 7) Preserving and improving soil organic matter content by tillage and crop production systems. 8) Considering that stubble residues are matter for soil protection, humus source and earthworm’ feed. 9) Site-specific adoption of green manure and cover crops. 10) Applying site-adopted (precision) fertilization and crop protection. Considering the development in agriculture, new endeavours will occur before long.


1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. K. Gupta ◽  
S. Mostaghimi ◽  
P. W. McClellan ◽  
M. M. Alley ◽  
D. E. Brann

Author(s):  
Bruce Atherton ◽  
Tom Krill ◽  
Andrew Ward ◽  
Gabriel Senay ◽  
John Lyon

1994 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-194
Author(s):  
J.J. Kessler ◽  
M. Moolhuijzen

Low External Input Sustainable Agriculture (LEISA) is receiving increased attention, both as a sustainable alternative to Green Revolution-like strategies making intensive use of external inputs, and as a strategy of sustainable agriculture in resource-poor environments where no or very few external inputs are used. The evaluation of LEISA field-experiences in the Philippines and in Ghana shows that the potential of LEISA to improve ecological and/or socioeconomic sustainability depends on site-specific factors in the first place. In areas with a high production potential, LEISA can simultaneously improve ecological sustainability and farmers' socioeconomic conditions by reduced use of external inputs. In areas with a low production potential, LEISA can stabilize and restore the carrying capacity, but generally has limited potential to improve socioeconomic conditions for growing populations, and an increased production may also result from a further depletion of natural resources, and by a limited number of farmers. Other factors that can influence the potential and the applicability of LEISA are the production dip and the rehabilitation period involved, high labour requirements, land ownership aspects, gender issues, constraints to implement a participatory technology development approach, macroeconomic aspects, government influences and information dissemination. Together with the site-specific conditions, these aspects should be considered in planning and evaluation of LEISA techniques.


1998 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 489-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. B. Senay ◽  
A. D. Ward ◽  
J. G. Lyon ◽  
N. R. Fausey ◽  
S. E. Nokes

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Ehlert ◽  
K.-H. Dammer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document