Error Covariance Estimation and Representation for Mesoscale Data Assimilation

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qin Xu
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Covariance Estimation ◽  
Error Covariance

scholarly journals Background error covariance estimation for atmospheric CO 2 data assimilation

2013 ◽  
Vol 118 (17) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek Chatterjee ◽  
Richard J. Engelen ◽  
Stephan R. Kawa ◽  
Colm Sweeney ◽  
Anna M. Michalak
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Covariance Estimation ◽  
Background Error ◽  
Background Error Covariance ◽  
Error Covariance

Maximum Likelihood Ensemble Filter: Theoretical Aspects

2005 ◽  
Vol 133 (6) ◽  
pp. 1710-1726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milija Zupanski
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Cost Function ◽  
Ensemble Data Assimilation ◽  
Error Covariance ◽  
Ensemble Data ◽  
Analysis Error ◽  
Nonlinear Observation ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Ensemble Filter

Abstract A new ensemble-based data assimilation method, named the maximum likelihood ensemble filter (MLEF), is presented. The analysis solution maximizes the likelihood of the posterior probability distribution, obtained by minimization of a cost function that depends on a general nonlinear observation operator. The MLEF belongs to the class of deterministic ensemble filters, since no perturbed observations are employed. As in variational and ensemble data assimilation methods, the cost function is derived using a Gaussian probability density function framework. Like other ensemble data assimilation algorithms, the MLEF produces an estimate of the analysis uncertainty (e.g., analysis error covariance). In addition to the common use of ensembles in calculation of the forecast error covariance, the ensembles in MLEF are exploited to efficiently calculate the Hessian preconditioning and the gradient of the cost function. A sufficient number of iterative minimization steps is 2–3, because of superior Hessian preconditioning. The MLEF method is well suited for use with highly nonlinear observation operators, for a small additional computational cost of minimization. The consistent treatment of nonlinear observation operators through optimization is an advantage of the MLEF over other ensemble data assimilation algorithms. The cost of MLEF is comparable to the cost of existing ensemble Kalman filter algorithms. The method is directly applicable to most complex forecast models and observation operators. In this paper, the MLEF method is applied to data assimilation with the one-dimensional Korteweg–de Vries–Burgers equation. The tested observation operator is quadratic, in order to make the assimilation problem more challenging. The results illustrate the stability of the MLEF performance, as well as the benefit of the cost function minimization. The improvement is noted in terms of the rms error, as well as the analysis error covariance. The statistics of innovation vectors (observation minus forecast) also indicate a stable performance of the MLEF algorithm. Additional experiments suggest the amplified benefit of targeted observations in ensemble data assimilation.

TREATMENT OF THE ERROR DUE TO UNRESOLVED SCALES IN SEQUENTIAL DATA ASSIMILATION

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 3619-3626 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALBERTO CARRASSI ◽  
STÉPHANE VANNITSEM
Keyword(s):  
Dynamical System ◽  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Model Error ◽  
Environmental Modeling ◽  
Sequential Data ◽  
Chaotic Dynamical System ◽  
Error Covariance ◽  
Sequential Data Assimilation

In this paper, a method to account for model error due to unresolved scales in sequential data assimilation, is proposed. An equation for the model error covariance required in the extended Kalman filter update is derived along with an approximation suitable for application with large scale dynamics typical in environmental modeling. This approach is tested in the context of a low order chaotic dynamical system. The results show that the filter skill is significantly improved by implementing the proposed scheme for the treatment of the unresolved scales.

scholarly journals Background Error in WRF Model

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Physical Properties ◽  
Covariance Matrix ◽  
Numerical Weather Prediction ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Background Error ◽  
Numerical Weather ◽  
Error Covariance ◽  
First Time

WRF model have been tuned and tested over Georgia’s territory for years. First time in Georgia theprocess of data assimilation in Numerical weather prediction is developing. This work presents how forecasterror statistics appear in the data assimilation problem through the background error covariance matrix – B, wherethe variances and correlations associated with model forecasts are estimated. Results of modeling of backgrounderror covariance matrix for control variables using WRF model over Georgia with desired domain configurationare discussed and presented. The modeling was implemented in two different 3DVAR systems (WRFDA andGSI) and results were checked by pseudo observation benchmark cases using also default global and regional BEmatrixes. The mathematical and physical properties of the covariances are also reviewed.

scholarly journals EnKF and 4D-Var data assimilation with chemical transport model BASCOE (version 05.06)

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 2893-2908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey Skachko ◽  
Richard Ménard ◽  
Quentin Errera ◽  
Yves Christophe ◽  
Simon Chabrillat
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Transport Model ◽  
Chemical Transport ◽  
Error Variance ◽  
Model Error ◽  
Chemical Processes ◽  
Observation Error ◽  
Chemical Transport Model ◽  
Error Covariance ◽  
Chemical Tracer

Abstract. We compare two optimized chemical data assimilation systems, one based on the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) and the other based on four-dimensional variational (4D-Var) data assimilation, using a comprehensive stratospheric chemistry transport model (CTM). This work is an extension of the Belgian Assimilation System for Chemical ObsErvations (BASCOE), initially designed to work with a 4D-Var data assimilation. A strict comparison of both methods in the case of chemical tracer transport was done in a previous study and indicated that both methods provide essentially similar results. In the present work, we assimilate observations of ozone, HCl, HNO3, H2O and N2O from EOS Aura-MLS data into the BASCOE CTM with a full description of stratospheric chemistry. Two new issues related to the use of the full chemistry model with EnKF are taken into account. One issue is a large number of error variance parameters that need to be optimized. We estimate an observation error variance parameter as a function of pressure level for each observed species using the Desroziers method. For comparison purposes, we apply the same estimate procedure in the 4D-Var data assimilation, where both scale factors of the background and observation error covariance matrices are estimated using the Desroziers method. However, in EnKF the background error covariance is modelled using the full chemistry model and a model error term which is tuned using an adjustable parameter. We found that it is adequate to have the same value of this parameter based on the chemical tracer formulation that is applied for all observed species. This is an indication that the main source of model error in chemical transport model is due to the transport. The second issue in EnKF with comprehensive atmospheric chemistry models is the noise in the cross-covariance between species that occurs when species are weakly chemically related at the same location. These errors need to be filtered out in addition to a localization based on distance. The performance of two data assimilation methods was assessed through an 8-month long assimilation of limb sounding observations from EOS Aura MLS. This paper discusses the differences in results and their relation to stratospheric chemical processes. Generally speaking, EnKF and 4D-Var provide results of comparable quality but differ substantially in the presence of model error or observation biases. If the erroneous chemical modelling is associated with moderately fast chemical processes, but whose lifetimes are longer than the model time step, then EnKF performs better, while 4D-Var develops spurious increments in the chemically related species. If, however, the observation biases are significant, then 4D-Var is more robust and is able to reject erroneous observations while EnKF does not.

scholarly journals Source backtracking for dust storm emission inversion using adjoint method: case study of northeast China

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianbing Jin ◽  
Arjo Segers ◽  
Hong Liao ◽  
Arnold Heemink ◽  
Richard Kranenburg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Dust Storm ◽  
Northeast China ◽  
Source Region ◽  
Background Error ◽  
Dust Transport ◽  
Error Covariance ◽  
Trace Back ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Sensitivity Method

Abstract. Emission inversion using data assimilation fundamentally relies on having the correct assumptions on the emission background error covariance. A perfect covariance accounts for the uncertainty based on prior knowledge, and is able to explain differences between model simulations and observations. In practice, emission uncertainties are constructed empirically, hence a partially unrepresentative covariance is unavoidable. Concerning its complex parameterization, dust emissions are a typical example where the uncertainty could be induced from many underlying inputs, e.g., information on soil composition and moisture, landcover and erosive wind velocity, and these can hardly be taken into account together. This paper describes how an adjoint model can be used to detect errors in the emission uncertainty assumptions. This adjoint based sensitivity method could serve as a supplement of a data assimilation inverse modeling system to trace back the error sources, in case that large observation-minus-simulation residues remain after assimilation based on empirical background covariance. The method follows on application of a data assimilation emission inversion for an extreme severe dust storm over East Asia (Jin et al., 2019b). The assimilation system successfully resolved observation-minus-simulation errors using satellite AOD observations in most of the dust-affected regions. However, a large underestimation of dust in northeast China remained despite the fact the assimilated measurements indicated severe dust plumes there. An adjoint implementation of our dust simulation model is then used to detect the most likely source region for these unresolved dust loads. The backward modeling points to the Horqin desert as source region, which was indicated as a non-source region by the existing emission scheme. The reference emission and uncertainty are then reconstructed over the Horqin desert by assuming higher surface erodibility. After the emission reconstruction, the emission inversion is performed again and the posterior dust simulations and reality are now in much closer harmony. Based on our results, it is advised that emission sources in dust transport models include Horqin desert as a more active source region.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document