U.S. Withdrawal from the Antiballistic Missile Treaty

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn F. Rusten
Keyword(s):  
Antiballistic Missile

The Antiballistic Missile: How Would It Be Used?

Science ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 151 (3716) ◽  
pp. 1329-1330
Author(s):  
George S. Stanford
Keyword(s):  
Antiballistic Missile

The Double Game

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Cameron
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Soviet Union ◽  
Vietnam War ◽  
Domestic Politics ◽  
The United States ◽  
Nuclear Strategy ◽  
Richard Nixon ◽  
Strategic Stability ◽  
Antiballistic Missile ◽  
Missile System

This book tracks the development of the United States’ first antiballistic missile system from the beginning of the John F. Kennedy administration through its almost total prohibition with the Antiballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty, which the United States and Soviet Union signed in May 1972. Historians generally interpret the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks that led to the ABM Treaty as signaling the United States’ acceptance of strategic stability based on mutual assured destruction (MAD) and approximate nuclear parity between the superpowers. The book argues that this is mistaken, because declassified records indicate that Richard Nixon believed that the United States required nuclear superiority to maintain its national security commitments. Kennedy, Lyndon Baines Johnson, and Nixon all engaged in a double game, in which they attempted to reconcile their personal feelings about the utility of nuclear weapons with the demands of maintaining a façade of strategic coherence to the American public and Congress. Kennedy and Johnson, who were personally far more skeptical than Nixon regarding the merits of nuclear superiority, were forced to adopt a public posture that emphasized its importance, because that was the prevailing public and congressional sentiment at the time. This only changed when the Vietnam War precipitated a collapse in the American domestic consensus behind superiority in 1969, forcing President Nixon to sign strategic arms limitation agreements, the philosophy behind which he profoundly opposed. The book thereby places domestic politics at the center of the formulation of US nuclear strategy.

APS in Washington Discusses Antiballistic Missile System

Physics Today ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 99-103
Author(s):  
Peter Franken
Keyword(s):  
Antiballistic Missile ◽  
Missile System

The Antiballistic Missile: How Would It Be Used?

Science ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 151 (3716) ◽  
pp. 1329-1330
Author(s):  
George S. Stanford
Keyword(s):  
Antiballistic Missile

The Antiballistic Missile: How Would It Be Used?

Science ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 151 (3716) ◽  
pp. 1329-1330
Author(s):  
G. S. Stanford
Keyword(s):  
Antiballistic Missile

The emergence of cooperation: national epistemic communities and the international evolution of the idea of nuclear arms control

1992 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuel Adler
Keyword(s):  
Soviet Union ◽  
Common Ground ◽  
Arms Control ◽  
Structural Realism ◽  
Epistemic Community ◽  
Epistemic Communities ◽  
Nuclear War ◽  
Nuclear Arms Control ◽  
Antiballistic Missile ◽  
Nuclear Arms

An American epistemic community played a key role in creating the international shared understanding and practice of nuclear arms control. In the absence of nuclear war, leaders' expectations of nuclear war and of its control were affected by causal theories and abstract propositions and models which, given their “scientific” and technical nature, were developed by an epistemic community. This study, which emphasizes the roles played by epistemic communities in policy innovation and in the diffusion of understandings across nations and communities, analyzes how the theoretical and practical ideas of the arms control epistemic community became political expectations, were diffused to the Soviet Union, and were ultimately embodied in the 1972 antiballistic missile (ABM) arms control treaty. In contrast to those studies that have concentrated primarily on the workings of international epistemic communities, this study stresses the notion that domestically developed theoretical expectations, which were worked out by a national group of experts and selected by the American government as the basis for negotiations with the Soviets, became the seed of the ABM regime. Moreover, by suggesting that the arms control epistemic community was really an aggregation of several factions that shared common ground against various intellectual and policy rivals, this study sheds light on the question of how much coherence an epistemic community requires. The political selection of new conceptual understandings, followed by their retention and diffusion at national and international levels, suggests an evolutionary approach at odds with explanations of international change advanced by structural realism and approaches based on it.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document