Detecting Motion from a Moving Platform; Phase 2: Lightweight, Low Power Robust Means of Removing Image Jitter

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. O'Brien ◽  
John E. McInroy
Keyword(s):  
Low Power ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Moving Platform

Rationalization and internalization

2001 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 215-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Léon Beauvois
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Facilitatory Effect ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Causal Explanations ◽  
Reduction Effect ◽  
Dissonance Reduction

After having been told they were free to accept or refuse, pupils aged 6–7 and 10–11 (tested individually) were led to agree to taste a soup that looked disgusting (phase 1: initial counter-motivational obligation). Before tasting the soup, they had to state what they thought about it. A week later, they were asked whether they wanted to try out some new needles that had supposedly been invented to make vaccinations less painful. Agreement or refusal to try was noted, along with the size of the needle chosen in case of agreement (phase 2: act generalization). The main findings included (1) a strong dissonance reduction effect in phase 1, especially for the younger children (rationalization), (2) a generalization effect in phase 2 (foot-in-the-door effect), and (3) a facilitatory effect on generalization of internal causal explanations about the initial agreement. The results are discussed in relation to the distinction between rationalization and internalization.

Less Power, Greater Conflict

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra C. Schmid
Keyword(s):  
Low Power ◽  
High Power ◽  
Goal Pursuit ◽  
Goal Conflict ◽  
Personal Goals ◽  
Multiple Goals ◽  
Objective Performance ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Way

Abstract. Power facilitates goal pursuit, but how does power affect the way people respond to conflict between their multiple goals? Our results showed that higher trait power was associated with reduced experience of conflict in scenarios describing multiple goals (Study 1) and between personal goals (Study 2). Moreover, manipulated low power increased individuals’ experience of goal conflict relative to high power and a control condition (Studies 3 and 4), with the consequence that they planned to invest less into the pursuit of their goals in the future. With its focus on multiple goals and individuals’ experiences during goal pursuit rather than objective performance, the present research uses new angles to examine power effects on goal pursuit.

An interdependence account of sexism and power: Men’s hostile sexism, biased perceptions of low power, and relationship aggression.

2019 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 338-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily J. Cross ◽  
Nickola C. Overall ◽  
Rachel S. T. Low ◽  
James K. McNulty
Keyword(s):  
Low Power ◽  
Hostile Sexism ◽  
Relationship Aggression

Power mad [low-power design]

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
J. Frenkil
Keyword(s):  
Low Power ◽  
Low Power Design

Idalopirdin bei Alzheimererkrankung: nicht besser als Plazebo

2018 ◽  
Vol 86 (08) ◽  
pp. 456-457
Keyword(s):  
Phase 2 ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Alzheimer Demenz

Die Blockade von Serotoninrezeptoren, insbesondere des Serotonin-Rezeptortyps 5-HT6, als Zusatztherapie in Kombination mit Cholinesterasehemmer, hat in experimentellen Versuchen sowie in einer Phase-2-Studie positive Effekte bei Demenz gezeigt. Im Rahmen eines Phase-3 Entwicklungsprogramms wurde nun die Effektivität des selektiven Serotoninrezeptor-Antagonisten Idalopirdin bei leichter bis mittelschwerer Alzheimer Demenz geprüft.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document