An Analysis of U.S. Navy Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief Operations

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cullen M. Greenfield ◽  
Cameron A. Ingram
Keyword(s):  
Disaster Relief ◽  
Humanitarian Assistance ◽  
Disaster Relief Operations ◽  
Relief Operations

Landpower and Humanitarian Assistance/Disaster Relief

2019 ◽  
pp. 271-288
Author(s):  
Charles Luke ◽  
Chris Bowers ◽  
Alex Willard
Keyword(s):  
International Development ◽  
Disaster Relief ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
Humanitarian Assistance ◽  
Disaster Relief Operations ◽  
Strategic Value ◽  
Agency For International Development ◽  
The Us ◽  
Us Government ◽  
Relief Operations

This chapter discusses the strategic value of landpower in Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HA/DR) operations. When disasters occur that are significant enough to derail/delay political agendas, the US government depends on landpower's unique capabilities to support the lead federal agency, the US Agency for International Development. The authors use three disaster relief operations case studies (the 2010 earthquake in Haiti, the 2014 Ebola outbreak in Liberia, and the 2013 Super Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines) to illuminate the Army's core roles in HA/DR success. Lastly, the chapter discusses the secondary benefits of successful HA/DR operations like enhancing interoperability among joint, interagency, and multinational partners, assuring partners and allies, and reinforcing the strategic narrative of US power.

scholarly journals The Multi-Role Support Ship for Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief Operations

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Buxton ◽  
Wade Carson
Keyword(s):  
Disaster Relief ◽  
Humanitarian Assistance ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Unique Combination ◽  
Operational Flexibility ◽  
Effective Response ◽  
Disaster Relief Operations ◽  
Ship Owner ◽  
Maritime Operations ◽  
Relief Operations

The paper examines the contemporary multi-role platform as an increasingly sought-after national capability and discusses how this ship-type, if designed and outfitted appropriately, can provide a range of capabilities to address the constantly evolving nature of naval doctrine and maritime operations. The motivations that drive acquisition decision makers to consider this type of capability are examined, namely: operational flexibility, doctrinal relevance and affordability. An examination of the pitfalls of acquiring a multi-role platform is also presented and discussed. An overview of how modern design techniques can be applied to ensure the ship owner is provided a range of options that are easily tailored to their unique combination of requirements follows. The paper concludes by presenting a typical modern multi-role vessel within the context of a humanitarian assistance and disaster relief scenario to illustrate the utility of these vessels as an effective response capability in a non-combatant role.

scholarly journals Synchronized Humanitarian, Military and Commercial Logistics: An Evolving Synergistic Partnership

Safety ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Yuste ◽  
Campbell ◽  
Canyon ◽  
Childers ◽  
Ryan
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chains ◽  
Disaster Preparedness ◽  
Disaster Relief ◽  
Humanitarian Assistance ◽  
Humanitarian Supply Chains ◽  
Logistics Systems ◽  
Disaster Relief Operations ◽  
Supply Chain Management System ◽  
Relief Operations ◽  
The Military

The increasing complexity and often transboundary scope of complex emergencies are exceeding the capacity of humanitarian logistics systems. The military plays a growing role in supplementing and even leading humanitarian assistance and disaster relief logistics. However, issues relating to military involvement such as sovereignty and cost have refocused the conversation onto capabilities and capacities of commercial logistics providers, who have not been fully engaged and integrated into disaster preparedness, response, and recovery activities. The commercial sector is part of the larger supply chain management system that includes contracting, procurement, storage, and transportation of food, water, medicine, and other supplies, as well as human resources, and necessary machinery and equipment. Military and commercial logistics share many of these elements and tasks daily. The most effective and efficient response combines key elements from humanitarian, military, and commercial logistics systems. Such trilateral cooperation represents the next step in an evolving partnership paradigm that is truly synergistic. We present a Synchronized Disaster Relief Model, as well as multiple examples of how military, commercial, and humanitarian supply chains each bring unique capabilities to disaster relief operations, and how these three supply chains can complement each other in a synergistic manner, through synchronized action.

Evidence-Based Decision-Making (Part II): Applications in Disaster Relief Operations

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 479-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Bradt
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Disaster Management ◽  
Disaster Relief ◽  
Data Gathering ◽  
Disaster Medicine ◽  
Humanitarian Assistance ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Disaster Relief Operations ◽  
Relief Operations ◽  
Evidenced Based

AbstractRecognized limitations to data in disaster management have led to dozens of initiatives to strengthen data gathering and decision-making during disasters. These initiatives are complicated by fundamental problems of definitions of terms, ambiguity of concepts, lack of standardization in methods of data collection, and inadequate attempts to strengthen the analytic capability of field organizations. Cross-cutting issues in needs assessment, coordination, and evaluation illustrate additional recurring challenges in dealing with evidence in humanitarian assistance. These challenges include lack of agency expertise, dyscoordination at the field level, inappropriate reliance on indicators that measure process rather than outcome, flawed scientific inference, and erosion of the concept of minimum standards.Decision-making in disaster management currently places a premium on expert or eminence-based decisions. By contrast, scientific advances in disaster medicine call for evidence-based decisions whose strength of evidence is established by the methods of data acquisition. At present, disaster relief operations may be data driven, but that does not mean that they are soundly evidence-based.Options for strengthening evidence-based activities include rigorously adhering to evidenced-based interventions, using evidence-based tools to identify new approaches to problems of concern, studying model programs as well as failed ones to identify approaches that deserve replication, and improving standards for evidence of effectiveness in disaster science and services.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document