Directory of Design Support Methods

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Alley
Keyword(s):  
Design Support ◽  
Support Methods

Design Support for 3D System Integration by Multi Physics Simulation

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Schneider ◽  
Sven Reitz ◽  
Joern Stolle ◽  
Roland Martin ◽  
Andreas Wilde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
System Integration ◽  
Design Support ◽  
Physics Simulation

Uncertainty-Based Self Configuring Simulation for Design Support

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger A. Dougal ◽  
Ferdinanda Ponci
Keyword(s):  
Design Support

scholarly journals REVIEW OF DESIGN HEURISTICS AND DESIGN PRINCIPLES IN DESIGN FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 2571-2580
Author(s):  
Filip Valjak ◽  
Angelica Lindwall
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Design Process ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Design Principles ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Design For Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Design Heuristics ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Support Methods

AbstractThe advent of additive manufacturing (AM) in recent years have had a significant impact on the design process. Because of new manufacturing technology, a new area of research emerged – Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) with newly developed design support methods and tools. This paper looks into the current status of the field regarding the conceptual design of AM products, with the focus on how literature sources treat design heuristics and design principles in the context of DfAM. To answer the research question, a systematic literature review was conducted. The results are analysed, compared and discussed on three main points: the definition of the design heuristics and the design principles, level of support they provide, as well as where and how they are used inside the design process. The paper highlights the similarities and differences between design heuristics and design principles in the context of DfAM.

scholarly journals Uptake and Dissemination of Multi-Criteria Decision Support Methods in Civil Engineering—Lessons from the Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 2940
Author(s):  
Michael Bruen
Keyword(s):  
Geographical Distribution ◽  
Earthquake Engineering ◽  
Civil Engineering ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Sewage Treatment ◽  
Foundation Design ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Design Earthquake ◽  
Support Methods ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The SCOPUS and Wed of Science bibliometric databases were searched for papers related to the use of multi-criteria methods in civil engineering related disciplines. The results were analyzed for information on the reported geographical distribution of usage, the methods used, the application areas with most usage and the software tools used. There was a wide geographical distribution of usage with all northern hemisphere continents well represented. However, of the very many methods available, a small number seemed to dominate usage, with the Analytic Hierarchy Process being the most frequently used. The application areas represented in the documents found was not widely spread and mainly seemed to be focused on issues such as sustainability, environment, risk, safety and to some extent project management, with less usage on other areas. This may be due to individual engineer’s choices in relation to if and how to disseminate the results of their work and to their choice of keywords and titles that determine if their publications are selected in bibliographic searches and thus more visible to a wider readership. A comparison with more topic focused searches, relating to Bridge Design, Earthquake Engineering, Cladding, Sewage Treatment, Foundation design, Truss design, Water Supply, Building Energy, Route selection and Transport mode showed very different results. Analysis of the papers in this area indicated that the full range of supporting software available for multi-criteria decision analysis (many listed in this paper) may not be fully appreciated by potential users.

scholarly journals Corporate Sustainability Strategies and Decision Support Methods: A Bibliometric Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fotis Kitsios ◽  
Maria Kamariotou ◽  
Michael A. Talias
Keyword(s):  
Strategic Management ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Business Strategy ◽  
Corporate Sustainability ◽  
Management Decision ◽  
Sustainability Strategies ◽  
Strategic Approach ◽  
Management Decision Making ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
Support Methods

Sustainability is becoming an increasing issue for decision-makers and scholars worldwide and many managers understand the significance of the strategic approach of corporate sustainability. However, they face difficulties in aligning sustainable development and strategic management as well as to implement it in practice. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to conduct a bibliometric analysis exploring the integration of strategic management, decision-making and corporate sustainability, providing a framework of interrelated issues according to the current literature in this area. 72 peer-reviewed papers were analyzed based on Webster’s and Watson’s (2002) methodology. The results of this review revealed that the number of publications in this domain has increased in the last decade, and there is a need to foster research (especially empirical) in this field because managers should find out ways to implement, in action, corporate sustainability strategies and integrate their action plans with their business strategy. This review concludes with a framework that includes the most commonly addressed issues of this topic and provides opportunities and challenges for further research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document