Military Implications of Moral Objectives in the National Security Strategy of the United States of America

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin A. Shevchuk
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
National Security ◽  
United States Of America ◽  
The United States ◽  
Security Strategy ◽  
National Security Strategy

Bioethics and the National Security State

2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Moreno
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
National Security ◽  
United States Of America ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
The United States ◽  
National Security Council ◽  
Security Strategy ◽  
National Security Strategy ◽  
Scientific Potential ◽  
National Security State

it is mandatory that in building up our strength, we enlarge upon our technical superiority by an accelerated exploitation of the scientific potential of the United States and our allies. National Security Council, NSC-G8: United States Objectives and Program for National Security April 14, 1950 Innovation within the armed forces will rest on experimentation with new approaches to warfare, strengthening joint operations, exploiting U.S. intelligence advantages, and takingfull advantage of science and technology. George W Bush, The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, September 17,2002

Grand Strategy in the Age of Trump: An Optimistic View

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-111
Author(s):  
John M. Callahan
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
National Security ◽  
United States Of America ◽  
The United States ◽  
Grand Strategy ◽  
Security Strategy ◽  
National Security Strategy ◽  
The World ◽  
The Status ◽  
Trump Administration

Drawing on President Trump’s statements as a candidate, and relating the status of the world in 2017, this work discusses the origins and evolution of a Grand Strategy for the Trump administration. This work helps to fill a gap in the literature by bringing together an assessment of Trump’s mindset as a candidate with his actions as President, most notably the formulation of the National Security Strategy of the United States of America. The studies assessment is that Trump had a well-formulated Grand Strategy in mind, nested in the “America First” ideology of the campaign, and that he has learned and modified the strategy based on experience. Finally, proposals for moving forward with a Grand Strategy for the future are considered.

Alliances, Military Basing, and Logistics

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc C. Vielledent
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
National Security ◽  
The United States ◽  
Security Strategy ◽  
Potential Conflict ◽  
Security Forces ◽  
Fiscal Constraints ◽  
Security Environment ◽  
National Security Strategy ◽  
The World

The United States has long enjoyed an essentially unopposed ability to project power and sustain its security forces dispersed throughout the world. However, the uncertainty facing the global security environment, including tenuous alliances, fiscal constraints, and a decline in overseas basing, has increased tensions in emerging areas of potential conflict. These factors are driving change regarding the United States’ defense posture and access agreements abroad. While the preponderance of overseas capability outweighs the preponderance of U.S. forces, deterrence continues to underpin the overarching national security strategy. However, deterrence options impacted by the lack of resilience and investment in distributed logistics and sustainment are generating an additional range of variables and conditions for operators on the ground to consider in shared and contested domains.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document