Manpower and Personnel Policy Research Group 1983-1990. Volume II: First Author Gaertner to Keil

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. H. Gaertner ◽  
S. Baxter ◽  
J. Greenlees ◽  
C. L. Gilroy ◽  
D. K. Horne
2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. G. Lakhani ◽  
C. Gilroy ◽  
C. Capps ◽  
E. J. Schmitz ◽  
A. Nelson

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Verdugo ◽  
T. A. Weiland ◽  
E. Schmitz ◽  
A. Whisman ◽  
M. Young

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Arabian ◽  
D. Horne ◽  
R. Nord ◽  
E. Schmitz ◽  
M. Black

1992 ◽  
Vol 1 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. S24-S30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert G Robinson ◽  
Michele Barry ◽  
Michele Bloch ◽  
Stanton Glantz ◽  
Jerie Jordan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-76
Author(s):  
Jeromey Temple ◽  
Tanara Sousa ◽  
Ruth Williams ◽  
Jay Stiles ◽  
Libby Brooke ◽  
...  

Background  For researchers working in gerontology or the demography of ageing, knowledge of and access to population-based data, which includes mature age respondents, is critical. The collection of metadata (information describing data) supports researchers in their search for relevant data. Aims  This proof-of-concept project seeks to develop a metadata database including metadata on Australian sample surveys relevant to ageing over the period 2010–2018. Data and methods  We used a five-stage approach to create the Centre for Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR) metadata database on ageing: 1) identification of in-scope survey datasets; 2) indexing the in-scope surveys; 3) scraping metadata from publicly available sources; 4) appending metadata to a master database; and 5) creation of a webtool to enable users to search and export metadata and obtain contact details for the relevant data custodian. Results  The CEPAR Metadata Database webtool is available from: https://mspgh.unimelb.edu.au/centres-institutes/centre-for-health-policy/research-group/metadata-database. Conclusions  Metadata database collections can assist researchers to identify what data has been collected (for their specific research interest in ageing), how it was collected and how to gain access to the data.


2021 ◽  

Schools of thought in International Relations (IR) are increasingly differentiating to match with the multipolar power distribution. Yet, the newly implemented strands are facing criticism for the lack of a generally accepted systematic framework. Furthermore, there are ambiguities with regard to the possible applications and explanations for the theoretical approaches. Against this background, the KFIBS research group “International Relations Theories and Foreign Policy Research” discusses current trends and debates in IR, using selected theoretical approaches and applying them to empirical case studies to evaluate their performance. With contributions by Sebastian M. Niemetz, Jann Preisendörfer, Ludwig Schulze, Paul Emtsev, Pauline Mathieu, Nicolas Verbeek, Eliza Friederichs and Sascha Arnautović.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document