Software Reuse Executive PRIMER, 7th Edition.

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
DOD SOFTWARE REUSE INITIATIVE FALLS CHURCH VA
Keyword(s):  
Software Reuse ◽  
7Th Edition

Framework for Semantic Search Enabled Software Component Repository (SSESCR)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishnu Sharma ◽  
Vijay Singh Rathore ◽  
Chandikaditya Kumawat
Keyword(s):  
Software Quality ◽  
Software Reuse ◽  
Development Time ◽  
Software Component ◽  
Semantic Search ◽  
Easy Access ◽  
Software Components ◽  
Efficient Search ◽  
Systematic Reuse ◽  
New System

Software reuse can improve software quality with the reducing cost and development time. Systematic reuse plan enhances cohesion and reduces coupling for better testability and maintainability. Software reuse approach can be adopted at the highest extent if relevant software components can be easily searched, adapted and integrated into new system. Large software industries hold their own well managed component libraries containing well tested software component with the project category based classification .Access to these repositories are very limited. Software reuse is facing so many problems and still not so popular. This is due to issues of general access, efficient search and adoption of software component. This paper propose a framework which resolves all of the above issues with providing easy access to components, efficient incremental semantics based search, repository management, versioning of components.

scholarly journals Comparison of survival in non-metastatic inflammatory and other T4 breast cancers: a SEER population-based analysis

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dechuang Jiao ◽  
Jingyang Zhang ◽  
Jiujun Zhu ◽  
Xuhui Guo ◽  
Yue Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Significant Independent Predictor ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
7Th Edition

Abstract Background Previous studies have reported poor survival rates in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) patients than non-inflammatory local advanced breast cancer (non-IBC) patients. However, until now, the survival rate of IBC and other T4 non-IBC (T4-non-IBC) patients remains unexplored. Methods Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was searched to identify cases with confirmed non-metastatic IBC and T4-non-IBC who had received surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy between 2010 and 2015. IBC was defined as per the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition. Breast Cancer-Specific Survival (BCSS) was estimated by plotting the Kaplan-Meier curve and compared across groups by using the log-rank test. Cox model was constructed to determine the association between IBC and BCSS after adjusting for age, race, stage of disease, tumor grade and surgery type. Results Out of a total of 1986 patients, 37.1% had IBC and mean age was 56.6 ± 12.4. After a median follow-up time of 28 months, 3-year BCSS rate for IBC and T4-non-IBC patients was 81.4 and 81.9%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.398). The 3-year BCSS rate in HR−/HER2+ cohort was higher for IBC patients than T4-non-IBC patients (89.5% vs. 80.8%; log-rank p = 0.028), and in HR−/HER2- cohort it was significantly lower for IBC patients than T4-non-IBC patients (57.4% vs. 67.5%; log-rank p = 0.010). However, it was identical between IBC and T4-non-IBC patients in both HR+/HER2- (85.0% vs. 85.3%; log-rank p = 0.567) and HR+/HER2+ (93.6% vs. 91.0%, log-rank p = 0.510) cohorts. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, we observed that IBC is a significant independent predictor for survival of HR−/HER2+ cohort (hazards ratio [HR] = 0.442; 95% CI: 0.216–0.902; P = 0.025) and HR−/HER2- cohort (HR = 1.738; 95% CI: 1.192–2.534; P = 0.004). Conclusions Patients with IBC and T4-non-IBC had a similar BCSS in the era of modern systemic treatment. In IBC patients, the HR−/HER2+ subtype is associated with a better outcome, and HR−/HER2- subtype is associated with poorer outcomes as compared to the T4-non-IBC patients.

Proteus: a software reuse library system

1990 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 43-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. B. Frakes ◽  
T. P. Pole
Keyword(s):  
Software Reuse ◽  
Library System ◽  
Reuse Library
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document