Officer Career Development: Longitudinal Sample--Fiscal Year 1982

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina L. Burch ◽  
Reginald A. Bruce ◽  
Gerald L. Russell
1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina L. Burch ◽  
Reginald A. Bruce ◽  
Gerald L. Russell

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e027928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracey A Wilkinson ◽  
Christopher J Russell ◽  
William E Bennett ◽  
Erika R Cheng ◽  
Aaron E Carroll

ObjectiveTo investigate the scope of academic spam emails (ASEs) among career development grant awardees and the factors associated with the amount of time spent addressing them.DesignA cross-sectional survey of career development grant investigators via an anonymous online survey was conducted. In addition to demographic and professional information, we asked investigators to report the number of ASEs received each day, how they determined whether these emails were spam and time they spent per day addressing them. We used bivariate analysis to assess factors associated with the amount of time spent on ASEs.SettingAn online survey sent via email on three separate occasions between November and December 2016.ParticipantsAll National Institutes of Health career development awardees funded in the 2015 fiscal year.Main outcome measuresFactors associated with the amount of time spent addressing ASEs.ResultsA total of 3492 surveys were emailed, of which 206 (5.9%) were returned as undeliverable and 96 (2.7%) reported an out-of-office message; our overall response rate was 22.3% (n=733). All respondents reported receiving ASEs, with the majority (54.4%) receiving between 1 and 10 per day and spending between 1 and 10 min each day evaluating them. The amount of time respondents reported spending on ASEs was associated with the number of peer-reviewed journal articles authored (p<0.001), a history of publishing in open access format (p<0.01), the total number of ASEs received (p<0.001) and a feeling of having missed opportunities due to ignoring these emails (p=0.04).ConclusionsASEs are a common distraction for career development grantees that may impact faculty productivity. There is an urgent need to mitigate this growing problem.


1983 ◽  
Vol 47 (12) ◽  
pp. 767-770
Author(s):  
SL Handelman ◽  
PM Brunette ◽  
ES Solomon

2000 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 227-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee-Ann Prideaux ◽  
Peter A. Creed ◽  
Juanita Muller ◽  
Wendy Patton

Despite widespread acknowledgement of the importance of career development programs to assist students in their complex transition from school to work, very few specific career education interventions have been objectively evaluated. The aim of this paper is to highlight what the authors consider to be a conspicuous shortfall in the career development literature to date, that is, reports of methodologically sound career intervention studies carried out in actual high school settings. International trends in the world of work are briefly discussed in association with the repercussions these changes are producing for today's youth. The major portion of this article is devoted to a comprehensive review of career intervention studies with particular attention paid to the methodological and theoretical issues that resonate from this review process. Recommendations for future research are proposed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 113-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annett Hüttges ◽  
Doris Fay

1983 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 290-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas C. Varvil-Weld ◽  
Bruce R. Fretz

1994 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 548-548
Author(s):  
Janet Shibley Hyde
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document