scholarly journals Model Study of the Cazenovia Creek Ice Control Structure

1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon E. Gooch ◽  
David S. Deck
Keyword(s):  
Control Structure ◽  
Model Study ◽  
Ice Control

scholarly journals Cazenovia Creek Ice-Control Structure

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
James H. Lever ◽  
Gordon Gooch ◽  
Steven F. Daly
Keyword(s):  
Control Structure ◽  
Ice Control

Upstream Effects of Cazenovia Creek Ice-Control Structure

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
James H. Lever ◽  
Steven F. Daly
Keyword(s):  
Control Structure ◽  
Ice Control

Assessing the Effectiveness of an Ice Control Structure

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie M. Vuyovich ◽  
Kathleen D. White ◽  
Andrew M. Tuthill
Keyword(s):  
Control Structure ◽  
Ice Control

Design of Cazenovia Creek Ice Control Structure

2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
James H. Lever ◽  
Gordon Gooch
Keyword(s):  
Control Structure ◽  
Ice Control

Low-Cost Ice-Control Structure

1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. Lever ◽  
G. Gooch ◽  
A. Tuthill ◽  
C. Clark
Keyword(s):  
Control Structure ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Ice Control

Social Desirability in Personality Inventories

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Bäckström ◽  
Fredrik Björklund
Keyword(s):  
Social Desirability ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Work Performance ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Peer Ratings ◽  
Personality Inventories ◽  
Model Study ◽  
The Difference ◽  
New Variables

The difference between evaluatively loaded and evaluatively neutralized five-factor inventory items was used to create new variables, one for each factor in the five-factor model. Study 1 showed that these variables can be represented in terms of a general evaluative factor which is related to social desirability measures and indicated that the factor may equally well be represented as separate from the Big Five as superordinate to them. Study 2 revealed an evaluative factor in self-ratings and peer ratings of the Big Five, but the evaluative factor in self-reports did not correlate with such a factor in ratings by peers. In Study 3 the evaluative factor contributed above the Big Five in predicting work performance, indicating a substance component. The results are discussed in relation to measurement issues and self-serving biases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document