Site Evaluation Studies of the Massachusetts Bay Disposal Site for Ocean Disposal of Dredged Material

1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Hubbard ◽  
J. M. Penko ◽  
Terrence S. Fleming
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 900
Author(s):  
Leydis Villadiego Rojas ◽  
Ricardo Daza González ◽  
Bladimir Salcedo Castilla

This paper presents an analysis of the affected area at an ocean disposal site, in terms of sediment dispersion, as a consequence of the dis-posal of dredged material from the approach channel for Buenaventura´s Port. The analysis was carried out at three points within Buenaven-tura´s Bay, one located at the authorized disposal site, a second point at a proposed future disposal site and a third point at the Bocana Sector, where the highest tidal velocities are identified. The PTM (Particle Tracking Model) mathematical model was used for this investigation, showing that due to the hydrodynamic conditions, a sediment particle can reach a longer dispersion distance from its original disposal point. Finally, sediment dispersion at the three analysis points were compared in terms of current velocity and maximum displacement.


1998 ◽  
Vol 37 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 87-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kussmaul ◽  
A. Groengroeft ◽  
H. Koethe

In the year 1993 a confined and unused harbour basin was used to store 290,000 m3 of fine-grained dredged material from Hamburg harbour. About 70% of the deposit surface was water covered. The edge areas were above the water table and covered with reed. Emissions of dissolved compounds into the groundwater, as well as surface gas emissions were measured from 1994 to 1996. As indicators for water fluxes from the deposit we used NH4+ and HCO3− because of their high concentrations in mud porewater in comparison to groundwater. The average concentrations of NH4+ and HCO3− in the porewater increased during 2 years from 85 to 250 mg NH4+ 1−1 and from 2.0 to 3.1 g HCO3− 1−1, while the groundwater samples showed constant values of 8 mg NH4+ 1−1 and 0.7 g HCO3− 1−1. Furthermore, the average gas emissions over the water surface were 3.2 g CH4 m−2 d−1 and 0.8 g CO2 m−2 d−1. In contrast, no methane and 3.0 g CO2 m−2 d−1 were emitted from land areas. The results indicated, that there were no significant emissions of mud porewater compounds into the groundwater but high CH4-emissions over the water covered surface of the mud deposit.


Author(s):  
Kok-Leng Tay ◽  
Russell Parrott ◽  
Ken Doe ◽  
Adrian MacDonald ◽  
Yung-Tse Hung

2017 ◽  
pp. 366-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Feng Chen ◽  
Yun-Ru Ju ◽  
Chiu-Wen Chen ◽  
Yi-Kuo Chang ◽  
Cheng-Di Dong

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document