Job Performance Measurement: A Systematic Program of Research and Development

Among latent variables that can be used in e-collaboration research, job performance is a particularly important one. It measures what most e-collaboration tools in organizations aim to improve, namely the performance at work of individuals executing tasks collaboratively with others. The authors report on a comparative assessment of scores generated based on a self-reported job performance measurement instrument vis-à-vis official annual performance evaluation scores produced by supervisors. The results suggest that the self-reported measurement instrument not only presents good validity, good reliability and low collinearity; but that it may well be a better way of measuring job performance than supervisor scores.

Download Full-text

Performance Measures for National Bibliographic Services

Alexandria The Journal of National and International Library and Information Issues ◽

10.1177/095574908900100204 ◽

1989 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 27-35 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Philip Bryant

Keyword(s):

Research And Development ◽

Performance Measurement ◽

Performance Measures ◽

Level Of Detail ◽

British Library ◽

Regular Monitoring ◽

Major Study ◽

Library Research ◽

Development Department

The Centre for Bibliographic Management is funded by the British Library Research and Development Department, but the details given and opinions expressed are entirely the responsibility of the author. Performance can be measured in quantitative and qualitative terms. Quality of bibliographic service should be concerned with accuracy, consistency and timeliness. Functions and the criteria relating to them have to be determined in order to define effective targets; and regular monitoring is required. Adequacy of records is the criterion that poses most problems, as different users need different quality and level of detail; a major study of this was undertaken by the Centre for Bibliographic Management. Performance measurement is however usually desirable on a continuing basis; an example is the BNB MARC Currency Survey administered by the Centre for nine years.

Download Full-text

Which is the Best Way to Measure Job Performance

International Journal of e-Collaboration ◽

10.4018/ijec.2017040101 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 13 (2) ◽

pp. 1-9 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Ned Kock

Keyword(s):

Performance Evaluation ◽

Job Performance ◽

Performance Measurement ◽

Latent Variables ◽

Measurement Instrument ◽

Comparative Assessment ◽

The Self ◽

Good Reliability ◽

Evaluation Scores ◽

Collaboration Tools

Among latent variables that can be used in e-collaboration research, job performance is a particularly important one. It measures what most e-collaboration tools in organizations aim to improve, namely the performance at work of individuals executing tasks collaboratively with others. The authors report on a comparative assessment of scores generated based on a self-reported job performance measurement instrument vis-à-vis official annual performance evaluation scores produced by supervisors. The results suggest that the self-reported measurement instrument not only presents good validity, good reliability and low collinearity; but that it may well be a better way of measuring job performance than supervisor scores.

Download Full-text