Job Performance Measurement Classification Scheme for Validation Research in the Military.

1986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Kavanagh ◽  
Walter C. Borman ◽  
Jerry W. Hedge ◽  
R. B. Gould
Keyword(s):  
Job Performance ◽  
Performance Measurement ◽  
Classification Scheme ◽  
The Military ◽  
Validation Research

Which is the Best Way to Measure Job Performance

2021 ◽  
pp. 444-453
Author(s):  
Ned Kock
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Job Performance ◽  
Performance Measurement ◽  
Latent Variables ◽  
Measurement Instrument ◽  
Comparative Assessment ◽  
The Self ◽  
Good Reliability ◽  
Evaluation Scores ◽  
Collaboration Tools

Among latent variables that can be used in e-collaboration research, job performance is a particularly important one. It measures what most e-collaboration tools in organizations aim to improve, namely the performance at work of individuals executing tasks collaboratively with others. The authors report on a comparative assessment of scores generated based on a self-reported job performance measurement instrument vis-à-vis official annual performance evaluation scores produced by supervisors. The results suggest that the self-reported measurement instrument not only presents good validity, good reliability and low collinearity; but that it may well be a better way of measuring job performance than supervisor scores.

Which is the Best Way to Measure Job Performance

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ned Kock
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Job Performance ◽  
Performance Measurement ◽  
Latent Variables ◽  
Measurement Instrument ◽  
Comparative Assessment ◽  
The Self ◽  
Good Reliability ◽  
Evaluation Scores ◽  
Collaboration Tools

Among latent variables that can be used in e-collaboration research, job performance is a particularly important one. It measures what most e-collaboration tools in organizations aim to improve, namely the performance at work of individuals executing tasks collaboratively with others. The authors report on a comparative assessment of scores generated based on a self-reported job performance measurement instrument vis-à-vis official annual performance evaluation scores produced by supervisors. The results suggest that the self-reported measurement instrument not only presents good validity, good reliability and low collinearity; but that it may well be a better way of measuring job performance than supervisor scores.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document