Social Information Processing and Group-Induced Response Shifts

1984 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. S. Bateman ◽  
R. W. Griffin ◽  
D. Rubenstein
Keyword(s):  
Information Processing ◽  
Social Information Processing ◽  
Social Information ◽  
Induced Response

Hostility and Perceptions of Support in Ambiguous Social Interactions

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana-Maria Vranceanu ◽  
Linda C. Gallo ◽  
Laura M. Bogart
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Social Networks ◽  
Information Processing ◽  
Social Interactions ◽  
Social Information Processing ◽  
Perceived Social Support ◽  
Social Information ◽  
Inverse Association ◽  
Processing Bias ◽  
Information Processing Bias

The present study investigated whether a social information processing bias contributes to the inverse association between trait hostility and perceived social support. A sample of 104 undergraduates (50 men) completed a measure of hostility and rated videotaped interactions in which a speaker disclosed a problem while a listener reacted ambiguously. Results showed that hostile persons rated listeners as less friendly and socially supportive across six conversations, although the nature of the hostility effect varied by sex, target rated, and manner in which support was assessed. Hostility and target interactively impacted ratings of support and affiliation only for men. At least in part, a social information processing bias could contribute to hostile persons' perceptions of their social networks.

Social information processing of children with Neurofibromatosis Type 1

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Kurss ◽  
Anna E. Craig ◽  
Jennifer Reiter-Purtill ◽  
Kathryn Vannatta ◽  
Cynthia Gerhardt
Keyword(s):  
Information Processing ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type 1 ◽  
Social Information Processing ◽  
Social Information ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document