Entomological Special Study No. 44-019-75/76. Pesticide Analysis of Surface Water Samples Collected in the Department of the Army Pesticide Monitoring Program, 1 September 1972 - 31 December 1974.

1975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clifford C. Roan ◽  
J. Howard Vinopal
Keyword(s):  
Surface Water ◽  
Water Samples ◽  
Monitoring Program ◽  
Special Study ◽  
Pesticide Analysis ◽  
Pesticide Monitoring ◽  
Department Of The Army ◽  
Surface Water Samples

Neonicotinoids Detection by new LC-MS/MS Method in Romanian Surface Waters

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (8) ◽  
pp. 1716-1722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasile Ion Iancu ◽  
Toma Galaon ◽  
Marcela Niculescu ◽  
Carol Blaziu Lehr
Keyword(s):  
Surface Water ◽  
Surface Waters ◽  
Water Samples ◽  
Solid Phase ◽  
Monitoring Program ◽  
Danube River ◽  
Limit Of Quantification ◽  
Neonicotinoid Insecticides ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Surface Water Samples

Increasing and widespread use of neonicotinoid insecticides in all world, together with their highly toxicity to invertebrates and environmental persistence mean that surface waters need to be monitored for these compounds. In the 2015, neonicotinoid insecticides have been incorporated in the watch list of substances for a European Union monitoring program (495/2015/ EU). A new method using automated solid phase extraction (SPE) with polymeric cartridges (OASIS HLB) followed by LC-MS/MS provided good separation of the most common neonicotindoid compounds. The method was developed for the determination of four neonicotinoid insecticides (nitenpyram, thiamethoxam, clothianidin, acetamiprid) in surface water with low limit of quantification (0.3-0.9 ng/L, nanograms per liter). Recoveries in surface water samples fortified at 200 ng/L for each compound ranged from 71.4 to 109.9 %; relative standard deviation ranged from 4 to 9%. The method was applied to water samples from four streams in Romania, Danube River and its tributaries (Arges River, Jiu River, and Olt River). The surface water samples were found to be contaminated clothianidin (1.08-6.4 ng/L) and by thiamethoxam (1.1-3.8ng/L). The highest concentrations were recorded in Danube River in Oltenita point (6.4ng/L) and in Gura-Vaii point (5.5ng/L). The concentration of acetamiprid and nitenpyram were situated below limit of quantification in all samples.

Occurrence of 1,4-dioxane and MTBE in drinking water sources in Japan

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Simazaki ◽  
M. Asami ◽  
T. Nishimura ◽  
S. Kunikane ◽  
T. Aizawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drinking Water ◽  
Surface Water ◽  
Water Samples ◽  
Quality Standards ◽  
Raw Water ◽  
Water Quality Standards ◽  
Butyl Ether ◽  
Water Treatment Plants ◽  
Standard Value ◽  
Surface Water Samples

Nationwide surveys of 1,4-dioxane and methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) levels in raw water used for the drinking water supply were conducted at 91 water treatment plants in Japan in 2001 and 2002, prior to the revision of the drinking water quality standards. 1,4-dioxane was widely and continuously detected in raw water samples and its occurrence was more frequent and its concentrations higher in groundwater than in surface water. However, its maximum concentration in raw water was much lower than its new standard value (50 μg/L), which was determined as a level of 10−5 excessive cancer risk to humans. Trace levels of MTBE were also detected in several surface water samples.

scholarly journals Development of Surface Molecularly Imprinted Polymers as Dispersive Solid Phase Extraction Coupled with HPLC Method for the Removal and Detection of Griseofulvin in Surface Water

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamran Bashir ◽  
Zhimin Luo ◽  
Guoning Chen ◽  
Hua Shu ◽  
Xia Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Water ◽  
Solid Phase Extraction ◽  
Molecularly Imprinted Polymers ◽  
Water Samples ◽  
Solid Phase ◽  
Phase Extraction ◽  
Dispersive Solid Phase Extraction ◽  
Molecularly Imprinted ◽  
Imprinted Polymers ◽  
Surface Water Samples

Griseofulvin (GSF) is clinically employed to treat fungal infections in humans and animals. GSF was detected in surface waters as a pharmaceutical pollutant. GSF detection as an anthropogenic pollutant is considered as a possible source of drug resistance and risk factor in ecosystem. To address this concern, a new extraction and enrichment method was developed. GSF-surface molecularly imprinted polymers (GSF-SMIPs) were prepared and applied as solid phase extraction (SPE) sorbent. A dispersive solid phase extraction (DSPE) method was designed and combined with HPLC for the analysis of GSF in surface water samples. The performance of GSF-SMIPs was assessed for its potential to remove GSF from water samples. The factors affecting the removal efficiency such as sample pH and ionic strength were investigated and optimized. The DSPE conditions such as the amount of GSF-SMIPs, the extraction time, the type and volume of desorption solvents were also optimized. The established method is linear over the range of 0.1–100 µg/mL. The limits of detection and quantification were 0.01 and 0.03 µg/mL respectively. Good recoveries (91.6–98.8%) were achieved after DSPE. The intra-day and inter-day relative standard deviations were 0.8 and 4.3% respectively. The SMIPs demonstrated good removal efficiency (91.6%) as compared to powder activated carbon (67.7%). Moreover, the SMIPs can be reused 10 times for water samples. This is an additional advantage over single-use activated carbon and other commercial sorbents. This study provides a specific and sensitive method for the selective extraction and detection of GSF in surface water samples.

Occurrence and fate of rosuvastatin, rosuvastatin lactone, and atorvastatin in Canadian sewage and surface water samples

Chemosphere ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 77 (10) ◽  
pp. 1285-1291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hing-Biu Lee ◽  
Thomas E. Peart ◽  
M. Lewina Svoboda ◽  
Sean Backus
Keyword(s):  
Surface Water ◽  
Water Samples ◽  
Surface Water Samples

A comparative study of radon levels in underground and surface water samples of Faridabad district of Southern Haryana, India

2018 ◽  
Vol 319 (3) ◽  
pp. 907-916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhupender Singh ◽  
Krishan Kant ◽  
Maneesha Garg ◽  
Ajit Singh ◽  
B. K. Sahoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Water ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Water Samples ◽  
Surface Water Samples

scholarly journals Analysis of Ground and Surface Water Samples from some Area of Dhaka City for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)

2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Mandal ◽  
N Khuda ◽  
MR Mian ◽  
M Moniruzzaman ◽  
N Nahar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons ◽  
Surface Water ◽  
Aromatic Hydrocarbons ◽  
Water Samples ◽  
Dhaka City ◽  
Polycyclic Aromatic ◽  
Surface Water Samples

Abstract not available DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/dujs.v63i1.21770 Dhaka Univ. J. Sci. 63(1): 59-60, 2015 (January)

scholarly journals Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding surveys extend the range of invasion for non-indigenous freshwater species in Eastern Europe.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gert-Jan Jeunen ◽  
Tatsiana Lipinskaya ◽  
Helen Gajduchenko ◽  
Viktoriya Golovenchik ◽  
Michail Moroz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Water ◽  
Water Samples ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Simultaneous Detection ◽  
Environmental Dna ◽  
Reference Database ◽  
Indigenous Species ◽  
Freshwater Species ◽  
Traditional Approaches ◽  
Surface Water Samples

Active environmental DNA (eDNA) surveillance through species-specific amplification has shown increased sensitivity in the detection of non-indigenous species (NIS) compared to traditional approaches. When many NIS are of interest, however, active surveillance decreases in cost- and time-efficiency. Passive surveillance through eDNA metabarcoding takes advantage of the complex DNA signal in environmental samples and facilitates the simultaneous detection of multiple species. While passive eDNA surveillance has previously detected NIS, comparative studies are essential to determine the ability of eDNA metabarcoding to accurately describe the range of invasion for multiple NIS versus alternative approaches. Here, we surveyed twelve sites, covering nine rivers across Belarus for NIS with three different techniques, i.e., an ichthyological, hydrobiological, and eDNA survey, whereby DNA was extracted from 500 mL surface water samples and amplified with two 16S rRNA primer assays targeting the fish and macro-invertebrate biodiversity. Nine non-indigenous fish and ten non-indigenous sediment-living macro-invertebrates were detected by traditional surveys, while seven NIS eDNA signals were picked up, including four fish, one aquatic and two sediment-living macro-invertebrates. Passive eDNA surveillance extended the range of invasion further north for two invasive fish and identified a new NIS for Belarus, the freshwater jellyfish Craspedacusta sowerbii. False-negative detections for the eDNA survey could be attributed to (i) preferential amplification of aquatic over sediment-living macro-invertebrates from surface water samples and (ii) an incomplete reference database. The evidence provided in this study recommends the implementation of both molecular-based and traditional approaches to maximize the probability of early detection of non-native organisms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document