LOW ENERGY PHOTOELECTRIC CROSS SECTION CALCULATIONS. VOLUME II. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

1967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Brysk ◽  
Arnold Glick
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Photoelectric Cross Section ◽  
Program Description

K-shell photoelectric cross-section measurements

1981 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 1147-1151 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Arora ◽  
K. L. Allawadhi ◽  
B. S. Sood
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Photoelectric Cross Section

Remeasurement of the low-energy cross section for the reaction

1979 ◽  
Vol 320 (2) ◽  
pp. 404-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.L. Zyskind ◽  
P.D. Parker
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Low Energy

Experiments on the reaction T( d , n ) 4 He I. The 90° cross-section

1951 ◽  
Vol 204 (1079) ◽  
pp. 488-499 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Heavy Water ◽  
Incident Beam ◽  
Absolute Magnitude ◽  
Alpha Particles ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Energy Relation ◽  
Conventional Theory ◽  
Simultaneous Observation ◽  
The Cross

The 90° cross-section of the reaction 3 1 H( d , n ) 4 2 He has been investigated over the energy range 100 to 200 keV (energy of bombarding triton) using the 200 keV accelerating set of the establishment. Two methods have been used. As a preliminary experiment the yield of alpha-particles from a thick heavy-ice target was measured per unit charge of incident beam, as a function of deuteron energy, and the variation of cross-section deduced from the gradient of this excitation curve and the range energy relation for tritons in heavy water. Secondly, a comparison was made between the yield of alpha-particles from the D-T reaction and the yield of protons from the D-D reaction when a beam containing both deuterons and tritons was passed through a heavy-water vapour target. (The energy loss in this target was calculated as only a few hundred electron volts.) To do this a simultaneous observation was made of the protons and alpha-particles using the same counter. The values obtained for the cross-section have been compared with the resonance formulae given by Bretscher & French (1949) and by Tascbek, Everhart, Gittings, Hemmendinger & Jarvis (1948) and have been found to be in disagreement with formulae of this type. From considerations of the absolute magnitude of the cross-section it has been deduced that no conventional theory postulating reaction at a distance equal to the sum of the nuclear radii (cf. Konopinski & Teller 1948) will be able to explain this reaction. The evidence for a low-energy resonance (Allan & Poole 1949) is thought to be inconclusive.

Cross-section scaling for track structure simulations of low-energy ions in liquid water

2015 ◽  
Vol 166 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 15-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Schmitt ◽  
W. Friedland ◽  
P. Kundrát ◽  
M. Dingfelder ◽  
A. Ottolenghi
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Liquid Water ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Track Structure ◽  
Low Energy Ions

scholarly journals Low energy scattering cross section ratios ofN14(p,p)N14

2015 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. deBoer ◽  
D. W. Bardayan ◽  
J. Görres ◽  
P. J. LeBlanc ◽  
K. V. Manukyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Scattering Cross Section ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Energy Scattering ◽  
Scattering Cross
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document